Tissue engineering for skeletal muscle regeneration

Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 230-234

  Rizzi, Roberto ^a,b   Bearzi, Claudia ^a,b   Mauretti, Arianna ^c   Bernardini, Sergio ^c   Cannata, Stefano ^c   Gargioli, Cesare ^a  

^a IRCCS MULTIMEDICA   (Italy)

^b CNR   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Hydrogel; Mesoangioblast; Skeletal muscle; Stem cell; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887873008     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22404554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Carlson BM. The regeneration of skeletal muscle. A review. Am J Anat 1973; 137: 119-149.
2. Guerette B, Wood K, Roy R, Tremblay JP. Efficient myoblast transplantation in mice immunosuppressed with monoclonal antibodies and CTLA4 Ig. Transplant Proc 1997; 29: 1932-1934.
3. Liao H, Zhou, GQ. Development and progress of engineering of skeletal muscle tissue. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2009; 15: 319-331.
4. Pisconati A, Bernet JD, Olwin BB. Syndecans in skeletal muscle development regeneration and homeostasis. MLTJ 2012;2(1):1-9.
5. Okano T, Matsuda T. Tissue engineered skeletal muscle: preparation of highly dense, highly oriented hybrid muscular tissues. Cell transplantation 1998; 7: 71-82.
6. Gilbert PM, Gilbert PM, Havenstrite KL et al. Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science 2010; 329: 1078-1081.
7. Buonocore D, Rucci S, Vandoni M, Negro M, Marzatico F. Oxidative system in aged skeletal muscle. MLTJ 2011;1(3): 85-90.
8. Hudlicka O. Microcirculation in skeletal muscle MLTJ 2011;1(1): 3-11.
9. Grazi E. Experimental basis of the hypotheses on the mechanism of skeletal muscle contraction MLTJ 2011;1(3):77-84.
10. Ohlendieck K. Proteomic profiling of skeletal muscle plasticity MLTJ 2011; 1(4):118-125.
11. Tse JR, Engler AJ. Stiffness gradients mimicking in vivo tissue variation regulate mesenchymal stem cell fate. PloS one 2011; 6: e15978.
12. Rossi CA, Pozzobon M, De Coppi P. Advances in musculoskeletal tissue engineering: moving towards therapy. Organogenesis 2010; 6: 167-172.
13. Rossi CA, Flaibani M, Blaauw B et al. In vivo tissue engineering of functional skeletal muscle by freshly isolated satellite cells embedded in a photopolymerizable hydrogel. FASEB J 2011; 25: 2296-2304.
14. Seliktar D. Designing cell-compatible hydrogels for biomedical applications. Science 2012; 336: 1124-1128.
15. Pratt AB, Weber FE, Schmoekel HG et al. Synthetic extracellular matrices for in situ tissue engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004; 86: 27-36.
16. West J, Hubbell J. Polymeric Biomaterials with Degradation Sites for Proteases Involved in Cell Migration. Macromolecules 1999; 32: 241-244.
17. Elisseeff J, Anseth K, Sims D et al. Transdermal photopolymerization of poly(ethylene oxide)-based injectable hydrogels for tissue-engineered cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 1014-1022.
18. Cohn D, Lando G, Sosnik A et al. PEO-PPO-PEObased poly(ether ester urethane)s as degradable reverse thermo-responsive multiblock copolymers. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 1718-1727.
19. Shachaf Y, Gonen-Wadmany M, Seliktar D. The biocompatibility of PluronicF127 fibrinogen-based hydrogels. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 2836-2847.
20. Lutolf MP, Lauer-Fields JL, Schmoekel HG et al. Synthetic matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive hydrogels for the conduction of tissue regeneration: engineering cellinvasion characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 5413-5418.
21. Abuchowski A, McCoy JR, Palczuk NC et al. Effect of covalent attachment of polyethylene glycol on immunogenicity and circulating life of bovine liver catalase. J Biol Chem 1977; 252: 3582-3586.
22. Peppas NA, Keys KB, Torres-Lugo M, Lowman AM. Poly(ethylene glycol)-containing hydrogels in drug delivery. J Control Release 1999; 62: 81-87.
23. Cruise GM, Hegre OD, Scharp DS, Hubbell JA. A sensitivity study of the key parameters in the interfacial photopolymerization of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate upon porcine islets. Biotechnol Bioeng 1998; 57: 655-665.
24. Elisseeff J, McIntosh W, Anseth K et al. Photoencapsulation of chondrocytes in poly(ethylene oxide)-based semi-interpenetrating networks. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 51: 164-171.
25. Reece TB, Maxey TS, Kron IL. A prospectus on tissue adhesives. Am J Surg 2001; 182: 40S-44S.
26. Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem Rev 2001; 101: 1869-1879.
27. Kogan G, Soltes L, Stern R, Gemeiner P. Hyaluronic acid: a natural biopolymer with a broad range of biomedical and industrial applications. Biotechnol Lett 2007; 29: 17-25.
28. Almany L, Seliktar D. Biosynthetic hydrogel scaffolds made from fibrinogen and polyethylene glycol for 3D cell cultures. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 2467-2477.
29. Paylor B, Natarajan A, Zhang RH, Rossi F. Nonmyogenic cells in skeletal muscle regeneration. Curr Top Dev Biol 2011; 96: 139-165.
30. Minasi MG, Riminucci M, De Angelis L et al. The mesoangioblast: a multipotent, self-renewing cell that originates from the dorsal aorta and differentiates into most mesodermal tissues. Development 2002; 129: 2773-2783.
31. De Angelis L, Berghella L, Coletta M et al. Skeletal myogenic progenitors originating from embryonic dorsal aorta coexpress endothelial and myogenic markers and contribute to postnatal muscle growth and regeneration. J Cell Biol 1999; 147: 869-878.
32. Sampaolesi M, Torrente Y, Innocenzi A et al. Cell therapy of alpha-sarcoglycan null dystrophic mice through intra-arterial delivery of mesoangioblasts. Science 2003; 301: 487-492.
33. Sampaolesi M, Blot S, D'Antona G et al. Mesoangioblast stem cells ameliorate muscle function in dystrophic dogs. Nature 2006; 444: 574-579.
34. Vandenburgh HH, Swasdison S, Karlisch P. Computeraided mechanogenesis of skeletal muscle organs from single cells in vitro. FASEB J 1991; 5: 2860-2867.