Perceptions of Bias in Political Content in Late Night Comedy Programs

Electronic News

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 158-173

  Arpan, Laura M ^a   Bae, Beom ^d   Chen, Yen Shen ^b   Greene, Gary H ^c  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

bias; comedy; hostile media effect; infotainment; news

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887862492     PISSN: 19312431     EISSN: 1931244X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1931243111421765     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Ariyanto A. Hornsey M. Gallois C. (2007). Group allegiances and perceptions of media bias: Taking into account both the perceiver and the source. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 266–279.
2. Arpan L. M. Peterson E. (2008). Influence of source liking and personality traits on perceptions of bias and news source selection. Media Psychology, 11, 310–329.
3. Babbie E. (2001). The practice of social research. (9th ed.).Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
4. Basil M. D. (1996). The use of student samples in communication research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 431–440.
5. Baum M. A. (2003). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence. Political Communication, 20, 173–190.
6. Baum M. A. (2005). Talking the vote: Why presidential candidates hit the talk show circuit. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 213–234.
7. Baum M. A. Gussin P. (2007). In the eye of the beholder: How information shortcuts shape individual perceptions of bias and future news source selection. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3, 1–31.
8. Baumgartner J. Morris J. S. (2006). The daily show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research, 34, 341–367.
9. Beaudoin C. E. Thorson E. (2002). A marketplace theory of media use. Mass Communication & Society, 5, 241–262.
10. Castillo J. (2008). Agonistic democracy and the narrative of distempered elites: An analysis of citizen discourse on political message forums (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University.
11. Coe K. Tewksbury D. Bond B. J. Drogos K. L. Porter R. W. Yahn A. Zhang Y. (2008). Hostile news: Partisan use and perceptions of cable news programming. Journal of Communication, 58, 201–219.
12. Comedian D. L. Hughley to host CNN show (2008, October 15). Retrieved from: http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/TV/10/15/cnn.hughley/index.html?iref=newssearchCNN.
13. Eveland W. P. Shah D. V. (2003). Impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias. Political Psychology, 24, 101–117.
14. Feldman L. (2007). The news about comedy: Young audiences, the daily show, and evolving notions of journalism. Journalism, 8, 406–427.
15. Forgas J. P. (2002). Feeling and doing: The role of affect in social cognition and behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 205–210.
16. Giner-Sorolla R. Chaiken S. (1994). The causes of hostile media judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 165–180.
17. Gunther A. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 147–167.
18. Gunther A. C. Christen C. T. Liebhart J. L. Chia S. C. (2001). Congenial public, contrary press, and biased estimates of the climate of opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 295–320.
19. Gunther A. C. Christen C. T. (2002). Projection or persuasive press? Contrary effects of personal opinion and perceived news coverage on estimates of public opinion.”. Journal of Communication, 52, 177–195.
20. Gunther A. C. Miller N. E. (2008). Assimilation and contrast in the hostile media effect. Paper presented to International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.
21. Hwang H. Pan Z. Sun Y. (2008). Influence of hostile media perception on willingness to engage in discursive activities: An examination of mediating role of media indignation. Media Psychology, 11, 76–97.
22. Iyengar S. Hahn K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 57, 19–39.
23. Meyer P. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567–574.
24. Moy P. Xenos M. A. Hess V. K. (2005). Communication and citizenship; Mapping the political effects of infotainment. Mass Communication and Society, 8, 111–131.
25. Nabi R. Moyer-Guse M. Byrne S. (2007). All joking aside: A serious investigation into the persuasive effect of funny social messages. Communication Monographs, 74, 29–54.
26. Niven D. Lichter S. R. Amundson D. (2003). The political content of late night comedy. Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics, 8, 118–133.
27. Papper B. (2006). The future of news: A study by the radio television news directors foundation. Washington, DC: Radio and Television News Directors Foundation.
28. Perloff R. M. (1989). Ego-involvement and the third person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16, 236–262.
29. Petty R. E. Cacioppo J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Berkovitz L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123–205). Vol. 19, New York, NY: Academic Press.
30. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2004, June 8). News audiences increasingly politicized. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/215.pdf.
31. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2006, June 20). Iraq views improve,small bounce for Bush. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/278.pdf.
32. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2007, August 9). Internet news audience highly critical of news organizations: Views of press values and performance: 1985-2007. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/348.pdf.
33. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2008, January 11). Internet’s broader role in campaign 2008. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/384.pdf.
34. Priest R. F. (1966). Election jokes: The effects of reference group membership. Psychological Reports, 18, 600–602.
35. Roskos-Ewoldsen D. R. (1997). Attitude accessibility and persuasion: Review and a transactive model. Communication Yearbook, 20, 185–225.
36. Rusten J. (2006). Who “invented” comedy? The ancient candidates for the origins of comedy and the visual evidence. American Journal of Philology, 127, 37–66.
37. Schmitt K. Gunther A. C. Liebhart J. L. (2004). Why partisans see mass media as biased. Communication Research, 31, 623–641.
38. Tsfati Y. Cappella J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30, 504–529.
39. Tsfati Y. Cappella J. N. (2005). Why do people watch news they do not trust? Need for cognition as a moderator in the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Media Psychology, 7, 251–272.
40. Tsfati Y. Cohen J. (2005). Democratic consequences of hostile media perceptions: The case of Gaza settlers. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10, 28–51.
41. Tsfati Y. Peri Y. (2006). Mainstream media skepticism and exposure to extra-national and sectorial news media: The case of Israel. Mass Communication & Society, 9, 165–187.
42. Vallone R. P. Ross L. Lepper M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception of media bias in coverage of the Beirut Massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577–585.
43. Vidmar N. Rokeach M (1974). Archie Bunker’s bigotry: A study in selective perception and exposure. Journal of Communication, 24, 36–47.
44. Watts D. Domke D. Shah D. V. Fan D. P. (1999). Elite cues and media bias: Explaining public perceptions of a liberal press. Communication Research, 26, 144–175.
45. Weise R. E. (1996). Partisan perceptions of political humor. Humor, 9, 199–207.
46. Worth L. T. Mackie D. M. (1987). Cognitive mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Social Cognition, 5, 76–94.
47. Young D. G. (2004). Late-night comedy in election 2000: Its influence on candidate trait ratings and the moderating effects of political knowledge and partisanship. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 1–22.
48. Young D. G. (2007). Jon Stewart a heretic? Surely you jest. The daily show’s impact on cynicism, political engagement and participation. Paper presentation at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL, 15-18 November.
49. Young D. G. (2008). The privileged role of the late-night joke: Exploring humor’s role in disrupting argument scrutiny. Media Psychology, 11, 119–142.
50. Young D. G. Tisinger R. (2006). Dispelling late-night myths: News consumption among late-night comedy viewers and the predictors of exposure to various late-night shows. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11, 113–134.
51. Zillmann D. (1985). Affect, mood, and emotion as determinants of selective exposure. In Zillmann D. Bryant J. (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 157–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Zillmann D. (2003). Theory of affective dynamics: Emotions and moods. In Bryant J. Roskos-Ewoldsen D. Cantor J. (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 533–567). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.