Laboratory experiments on speciation

Experimental Evolution: Concepts, Methods, and Applications of Selection Experiments

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 650-675

  Fry, James D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887856746     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (85)

1. Bacigalupe, L. D., H. S. Crudgington, F. Hunter, A. J. Moore, and R. R. Snook. 2007. Sexual conflict does not drive reproductive isolation in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:1763-1771.
2. Barker, J. S. F., and L. J. Cummins. 1969. The effect of selection for sternopleural bristle number on mating behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 61:713-719.
3. Barton, N. H. 2001. Speciation (introduction to special issue). Trends in Ecology&Evolution 16:325.
4. Boake, C. R. B., K. McDonald, S. Maitra, and R. Ganguly. 2003. Forty years of solitude: Lifehistory divergence and behavioural isolation between laboratory lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16:83-90.
5. Bush, G. L. 1975. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous parasitic insects. Pages 187-206 in P. W. Price, ed. Evolutionary Strategies of Parasitic Insects and Mites. New York: Plenum.
6. Bush, G. L. 1994. Sympatric speciation in animals: New wine in old bottles. Trends in Ecology&Evolution 8:285-288.
7. Butlin, R. 1987. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends in Ecology&Evolution 2:8-13.
8. Carson, H. L., and A. R. Templeton. 1984. Genetic revolutions in relation to speciation phenomena: The founding of new populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:97-131.
9. Coyne, J. A., and B. Grant. 1972. Disruptive selection on I-maze activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 71:185-188.
10. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
11. Crossley, S. A. 1974. Changes in mating behavior produced by selection for ethological isolation between ebony and vestigial mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 28:631-647.
12. Dambrowski, H. R., C. Linn, S. H. Berlocher, A. A. Forbes, W. Roelefs, and J. L. Feder. 2005. The genetic basis for fruit odor discrimination in Rhagoletis flies and its significance for sympatric host shifts. Evolution 59:1953-1964.
13. de Oliveira, A. K., and A. R. Cordeiro. 1980. Adaptation of Drosophila willistoni experimental populations to extreme pH medium. II. Development of incipient reproductive isolation. Heredity 44:123-130.
14. Dettman, J. R., J. B. Anderson, and L. M. Kohn. 2008. Divergent adaptation promotes reproductive isolation among experimental populations of the filamentous fungus Neurospora. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8:35.
15. Dettman, J. R., C. Sirjusingh, L. M. Kohn, and J. B. Anderson. 2007. Incipient speciation by divergent adaptation and antagonistic epistasis in yeast. Nature 447:585-589.
16. Diehl, S. R., and G. L. Bush. 1989. The role of habitat preference in adaptation and speciation. Pages 345-365 in D. Otte and J. Endler, eds. Speciation and Its Consequences. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
17. Dobzhansky, T., D. Pavlovsky, and S. R. Powell. 1976. Partially successful attempt to enhance reproductive isolation between semispecies of Drosophila paulistorum. Evolution 30:201-212.
18. Dodd, D. M. B., and J. R. Powell. 1985. Founder-flush speciation: an update of experimental results with Drosophila. Evolution 39:1388-1392.
19. Ehrman, L. 1971. Natural selection for the origin of reproductive isolation. American Naturalist 105:479-483.
20. Ehrman, L. 1973. More on natural selection for the origin of reproductive isolation. American Naturalist 107:318-319.
21. Ehrman, L. 1979. Still more on natural selection for the origin of reproductive isolation. American Naturalist 113:148-150.
22. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Essex, U.K.: Longman.
23. Florin, A.-B., and A. Ödeen. 2002. Laboratory experiments are not conducive for allopatric speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15:10-19.
24. Fry, J. D. 1999. The role of adaptation to host plants in the evolution of reproductive isolation: Negative evidence from Tetranychus urticae. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 23:379.
25. Fry, J. D. 2003. Multilocus models of sympatric speciation: Bush vs. Rice vs. Felsenstein. Evolution 57:1735-1746.
26. Fry, J. D., C. M. Bahnck, M. Mikucki, N. Phadnis, and W. C. Slattery. 2004. Dietary ethanol mediates selection on aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Integrative and Comparative Biology 44:275-283.
27. Fukatami, A., and D. Morikami. 1970. Selection for sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster by a modification of Koopman's method. Japanese Journal of Genetics 45:193-204.
28. Galiana, A., A. Moya, and F. J. Ayala. 1993. Founder-flush speciation in Drosophila pseudoobscura: A large-scale experiment. Evolution 47:432-444.
29. Grant, B., and L. E. Mettler. 1969. Disruptive and stabilizing selection on the "escape" behavior of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 62:625-637.
30. Greig, D., E. J. Louis, R. H. Borts, and M. Travisano. 2002. Hybrid speciation in experimental populations of yeast. Science 298:1773-1775.
31. Halliburton, R., and G. A. E. Gall. 1981. Disruptive selection and assortative mating in Tribolium castaneum. Evolution 35:829-843.
32. Harper, A. A., and D. M. Lambert. 1983. The population genetics of reinforcing selection. Genetica 62:15-23.
33. Higgie, M., S. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows. 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290:519-521.
34. Holland, B., and W. R. Rice. 1998. Chase-away sexual selection: Antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52:1-7.
35. Hostert, E. E. 1997. Reinforcement: A new perspective on an old controversy. Evolution 51:697-702.
36. Hurd, L. E., and R. M. Eisenberg. 1975. Divergent selection for geotactic response and evolution of reproductive isolation in sympatric and allopatric populations of houseflies. American Naturalist 109:353-358.
37. Kessler, S. 1966. Selection for and against ethological isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Evolution 20:634-645.
38. Kilias, G., S. N. Alahiotis, and M. Pelecanos. 1980. A multifactorial genetic investigation of speciation theory using Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 34:730-737.
39. Kirkpatrick, M., and V. Ravigné. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: Models and experiments. American Naturalist 159:S22-S35.
40. Kirkpatrick, M., and M. R. Servedio. 1999. The reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. Genetics 151:865-884.
41. Knight, G. R., A. Robertson, and C. H. Waddington. 1956. Selection for sexual isolation within a species. Evolution 10:14-22.
42. Koopman, K. F. 1950. Natural selection for reproductive isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Evolution 4:135-148.
43. Koref-Santibañez, S., and C. H. Waddington. 1958. The origin of sexual isolation between different lines within a species. Evolution 12:485-493.
44. Lawrence, J. G. 2002. Gene transfer in bacteria: speciation without species? Theoretical Population Biology 61:449-460.
45. Leu, J.-Y., and A. W. Murray. 2006. Experimental evolution of mating discrimination in budding yeast. Current Biology 16:280-286.
46. Lofdahl, K. L., D. Hu, L. Ehrman, J. Hirsch, and L. Skoog. 1992. Incipient reproductive isolation and evolution in laboratory Drosophila melanogaster selected for geotaxis. Animal Behaviour 44:783-786.
47. Markow, T. A. 1981. Mating preferences are not predictive of the direction of evolution in experimental populations of Drosophila. Science 213:1405-1407.
48. Martin, O. Y., and D. J. Hosken. 2003. The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423:979-982.
49. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
50. McKenzie, J. A., and A. Y. Game. 1987. Diazinon resistance in Lucilia cuprina: Mapping of a fitness modifier. Heredity 59:371-381.
51. Meffert, L. M., and E. H. Bryant. 1991. Mating propensity and courtship behavior in serially bottlenecked lines of the housefly. Evolution 45:293-306.
52. Miyatake, T., and T. Shimizu. 1999. Genetic correlations between life-history and behavioral traits can cause reproductive isolation. Evolution 53:201-208.
53. Mooers, A. Ø., H. D. Rundle, and M. C. Whitlock. 1999. The effects of selection and bottlenecks on male mating success in peripheral isolates. American Naturalist 153:437-444.
54. Moya, A., A. Galiana, and F. J. Ayala. 1995. Founder-effect speciation theory: Failure of experimental corroboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 92:3983-3986.
55. Noor, M. A. F., and J. L. Feder. 2006. Speciation genetics: evolving approaches. Nature Review Genetics 7:851-861.
56. Overmeer, W. P. J. 1966. Intersterility as a consequence of insecticide selections in Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Nature 209:321.
57. Paterniani, E. 1969. Selection for reproductive isolation between two populations of maize, Zea mays L. Evolution 23:534-547.
58. Powell, J. R. 1978. The founder-flush speciation theory: An experimental approach. Evolution 32:465-474.
59. Rainey, P. B., and M. Travisano. 1998. Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature 394:69-72.
60. Regan, J. L., L. M. Meffert, and E. H. Bryant. 2003. A direct experimental test of founder-flush effects on the evolutionary potential for assortative mating. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16:302-312.
61. Rice, W. R., and E. E. Hostert. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: What have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47:1637-1653.
62. Rice, W. R., and G. W. Salt. 1988. Speciation via disruptive selection on habitat preference: Experimental evidence. American Naturalist 131:911-917.
63. Rice, W. R., and G. W. Salt. 1990. The evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character under sympatric conditions: Experimental evidence. Evolution 44:1140-1152.
64. Rieseberg, L. H., B. Sinervo, C. R. Linder, M. C. Ungerer, and D. M. Arias. 1996. Role of gene interactions in hybrid speciation: Evidence from ancient and experimental hybrids. Science 272:741-745.
65. Rieseberg, L. H., and J. H. Willis. 2007. Plant speciation. Science 317:910-914.
66. Ringo, J., D. Wood, R. Rockwell, and H. Dowse. 1985. An experimental test of two hypotheses of speciation. American Naturalist 126:642-661.
67. Robertson, F. W. 1966a. The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila. 8. Adaptation to a new diet. Genetical Research, Cambridge 8:165-179.
68. Robertson, F. W. 1966b. A test of sexual isolation in Drosophila. Genetical Research, Cambridge 8:181-187.
69. Rundle, H. D. 2003. Divergent environments and population bottlenecks fail to generate premating isolation in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 57:2557-2565.
70. Rundle, H. D., S. F. Chenoweth, P. Doughty, and M. W. Blows. 2005. Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences. PLoS Biology 3:e368.
71. Rundle, H. D., A. Ø. Mooers, and M. C. Whitlock. 1998. Single founder-flush events and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Evolution 52:1850-1855.
72. Rundle, H. D., A. Ø. Mooers, and M. C. Whitlock. 1999. Experimental tests of founder-flush: A reply to Templeton. Evolution 53:1632-1633.
73. Rundle, H. D., and P. Nosil. 2005. Ecological speciation. Ecology Letters 8:336-352.
74. Scharloo, W. 1970. Reproductive isolation by disruptive selection: Did it occur? American Naturalist 105:83-88.
75. Sezer, M., and R. K. Butlin. 1998. The genetic basis of oviposition preference differences between sympatric host races of the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 265:2399-2405.
76. Soans, A. B., D. Pimentel, and J. S. Soans. 1974. Evolution of reproductive isolation in allopatric and sympatric populations. American Naturalist 108:117-124.
77. Spieth, H. T., and J. M. Ringo. 1983. Mating behavior and sexual isolation in Drosophila. Pages 223-284 in M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson, and J. N. Thompson, eds. The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila. London: Academic Press.
78. Templeton, A. R. 1980. The theory of speciation via the founder principle. Genetics 94:1011-1038.
79. Templeton, A. R. 1999. Experimental tests of genetic transilience. Evolution 53:1628-1632.
80. Thoday, J. M., and J. B. Gibson. 1962. Isolation by disruptive selection. Nature 193:1164-1166.
81. Thoday, J. M., and J. B. Gibson. 1970. The probability of isolation by disruptive selection. American Naturalist 104:219-230.
82. Via, S. 2001. Sympatric speciation in animals: The ugly duckling grows up. Trends in Ecology&Evolution 16:381-390.
83. Wallace, B. 1953. Genetic divergence of isolated populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Page 761 in G. Montalenti and A. Chiarugi, eds. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Genetics, Bellagio, Florence, Italy.
84. Weber, K. E., and L. R. Diggins. 1990. Increased selection response in larger populations: Selection for ethanol vapor resistance in Drosophila melanogaster at two population sizes. Genetics 125:585-597.
85. Wigby, S., and T. Chapman. 2006. No evidence that experimental manipulation of sexual conflict drives premating reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19:1033-1039.