Papilionoid inflorescences revisited (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 112, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1567-1571

  Prenner, Gerhard ^a  

^a JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Abrus precatorius; Cicer arietinum; Hardenbergia violacea; Inflorescence; Kennedia nigricans; Leguminosae; Papilionoideae; Pseudoraceme; Swainsona formosa

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; CROP PLANT; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; ONTOGENY; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SYMMETRY;

ABRUS; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHICKPEA; EVOLUTION; FABACEAE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HARDENBERGIA VIOLACEA; INFLORESCENCE; KENNEDIA NIGRICANS; LEGUME; PAPILIONOIDEAE; PSEUDORACEME; SWAINSONA FORMOSA; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ABRUS PRECATORIUS; CICER ARIETINUM; HARDENBERGIA VIOLACEA; INFLORESCENCE; KENNEDIA NIGRICANS; LEGUMINOSAE; PAPILIONOIDEAE; PSEUDORACEME; SWAINSONA FORMOSA;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FABACEAE; INFLORESCENCE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84887816920     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcs258     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Briggs BG, Johnson LAS. 1979. Evolution in the Myrtaceae - evidence from inflorescence structure. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 102: 157-256.
2. Bull-Herenü K, Classen-Bockhoff R. 2011. Open and closed inflorescences: more than simple opposites. Journal of Experimental Botany 62: 79-88.
3. Charlton WA. 1993. The rotated-lamina syndrome. I. Ulmaceae. Canadian Journal of Botany 71: 211-221.
4. Charlton WA. 1998. Pendulum symmetry. In: Jean RV, Barabe D. eds. Symmetry in plants. Singapore: World Scientific, 61-87.
5. Classen-Bockhoff R. 2000. Inflorescences in Bruniaceae. Opera Botanica Belgica 12: 1-310.
6. Davies AMR, Maxted H, van der Maesen LJG. 2007. A natural infrageneric classification for Cicer (Leguminosae, Cicereae). Blumea 52: 379-400.
7. Dormer KJ. 1945. An investigation of the taxonomic value of shoot structure in angiosperms with especial reference to Leguminosae. Annals of Botany 9: 141-153.
8. Endress PK. 1999. Symmetry in flowers: diversity and evolution. International Journal of Plant Science 160: 3-23.
9. Endress PK. 2001. Evolution of floral symmetry. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 4: 86-91.
10. Endress PK. 2010. Disentangling confusions in inflorescence morphology: patterns and diversity of reproductive shoot ramification in angiosperms. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 48: 225-239.
11. Friedman J, Harder LD. 2004. Inflorescence architecture and wind pollination in six grass species. Functional Ecology 18: 851-860.
12. Goebel K. 1928. Organographie der Pflanzen, 1, 3rd edn. Jena: Fischer.
13. Harder LD, Jordan CY, Gross WE, Routley MB. 2004. Beyond floricentrism: the pollination function of inflorescences. Plant Species Biology 19: 137-148.
14. Horn JW, van Ee BW, Morawetz JJ, et al. 2012. Phylogenetics and the evolution of major structural characters in the giant genus Euphorbia L. (Euphorbiaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63: 305-326.
15. Hu JM, Lavin M, Wojciechowski MF, Sanderson MJ. 2000. Phylogenetic systematics of the tribe Millettieae (Fabaceae) based on chloroplast trnK/matK sequences and its implications for evolutionary patterns in Papilionoideae. American Journal of Botany 87: 418-430.
16. Hutchinson J. 1964. The genera of flowering plants, 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17. Iwata T, Nagasaki O, Ishii HS, Ushimura A. 2012. Inflorescence architecture affects pollinator behaviour and mating success in Spiranthes sinensis (Orchidaceae). New Phytologist 193: 196-203.
18. Kirchoff BK. 1983. Floral organogenesis in five genera of the Marantaceae and in Canna (Cannaceae). American Journal of Botany 70: 508-523.
19. Lackey JA. 1981. Tribe 10.
20. Phaseoleae DC. (1825). In: Polhill RM, Raven PH. eds. Advances in legume systematics, Part 1. Kew, London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 301-327.
21. Lewis G, Schrire B, Mackinder B, Lock M. 2005. Legumes of the world. Kew, London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
22. Naghiloo S, Dadpour MR, Movafeghi A. 2012. Floral ontogeny in Astragalus compactus (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Galegeae): variable occurrence of bracteoles and variable patterns of sepal initiation. Planta 235: 793-805.
23. Prenner G. 2003. A developmental analysis of the inflorescence and the flower of Lotus corniculatus (Fabaceae-Loteae). Mitteilungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereines für Steiermark 133: 99-107.
24. Prenner G. 2004a. Floral ontogeny in Lespedeza thunbergii (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Desmodieae): variations from the unidirectional mode of organ formation. Journal of Plant Research 117: 297-302.
25. Prenner G. 2004b. New aspects in floral development of Papilionoideae: initiated but suppressed bracteoles and variable initiation of sepals. Annals of Botany 93: 537-545.
26. Prenner G, Rudall PJ. 2007. Comparative ontogeny of the cyathium in Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) and its allies: exploring the organ-flower- inflorescence boundary. American Journal of Botany 94: 1612-1629.
27. Prenner G, Hopper SD, Rudall PJ. 2008. Pseudanthium development in Calycopeplus paucifolius, with particular reference to the evolution of the cyathium in Euphorbieae (Euphorbiaceae-Malpighiales). Australian Systematic Botany 21: 153-161.
28. Prenner G, Vergara-Silva F, Rudall PJ. 2009. The key role of morphology in modelling inflorescence architecture. Trends in Plant Science 14: 302-309.
29. Sokoloff DD, Degtjareva GV, Endress PK, Remizowa MV, Samigullin TH, Valiejo-Roman CM. 2007. Inflorescence and early flower development in Loteae (Leguminosae) in a phylogenetic and taxonomic context. International Journal of Plant Science 168: 801-833.
30. Tapingkae T, Taji A, Kristiansen P. 2007. Floral ontogeny of Swainsona formosa (Fabaceae: Faboideae: Galegeae). Australian Journal of Botany 55: 643-652.
31. Teixeira SP, Ranga NT, Tucker SC. 2009. Inflorescence and floral development of Dahlstedtia species (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Millettieae). Flora 204: 769-781.
32. Tucker SC. 1987a. Floral initiation and development in legumes. In: Stirton CH. ed. Advances in legume systematics 3. Kew, London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 83-239.
33. Tucker SC. 1987b. Pseudoracemes in papilionoid legumes: their nature, development, and variation. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 95: 181-206.
34. Tucker SC. 1996. Trends in evolution of floral ontogeny in Cassia sensu stricto, Senna, and Chamaecrista (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Cassieae: Cassiinae); a study in convergence. American Journal of Botany 83: 687-711.
35. Tucker SC. 1998. Floral ontogeny in legume genera Petalostylis, Labichea, and Dialium (Caesalpinioideae: Cassieae), a series in floral reduction. American Journal of Botany 85: 184-208.
36. Tucker SC. 2003. Floral development in legumes. Plant Physiology 131: 911-926.
37. Tucker SC. 2006. Floral ontogeny of Hardenbergia violacea (Fabaceae: Faboideae: Phaseoleae) and taxa of tribes Bossiaeeae and Mirbelieae, with emphasis on presence of pseudoraceme inflorescence. Australian Systematic Botany 19: 193-210.
38. Van der Maesen LJG. 1972. Cicer L., a monograph of the genus with special reference to the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), its ecology and cultivation. Mededelingen Landbouwhoogeschool Wageningen 72-10: 1-342.
39. Vrijdaghs A, Caris P, Goetghebeur P, Smets E. 2005. Floral ontogeny in Scirpus, Eriophorum and Dulichium (Cyperaceae), with special reference to the perianth. Annals of Botany 95: 1199-1209.
40. Weberling F. 1989. Structure and evolutionary tendencies of inflorescences in the Leguminosae. Monographs in Systematic Botany of the Missouri Botanical Gardens 29: 35-58.
41. Weberling F, Troll W. 1998. Die Infloreszenzen. Typologie und Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers, Band II/2. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
42. Wojciechowski MF, Lavin M, Sanderson MJ. 2004. A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. American Journal of Botany 91: 1846-1862.
43. Wyatt R. 1982. Inflorescence architecture: how flower number, arrangement, and phenology affect pollination and fruit-set. American Journal of Botany 69: 585-594.
44. Wydler H. 1860. Kleine Beiträge zur Kenntnis einheimischer Gewächse. Flora 43: 83-96.