Rejection and modeling of arsenate by nanofiltration: Contributions of convection, diffusion and electromigration to arsenic transport

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 453, Issue , 2014, Pages 42-51

  Fang, Jun ^a   Deng, Baolin ^b  

^a Chartered   (United States)

^b University of Missouri   (United States)

Author keywords

Arsenate; Convection; Diffusion; Electromigration; Nanofiltration; Transport

Indexed keywords

AMIDES; ARSENIC; DIFFUSION; ELECTROMIGRATION; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; HEAT CONVECTION; IONIC STRENGTH; NANOFILTRATION; PORE SIZE;

ARSENATE; ATTENUATED TOTAL REFLECTION FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; DIFFUSIVE TRANSPORT; INITIAL CONCENTRATION; MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE; REJECTION MECHANISMS; TRANSPORT;

MEMBRANES;

AMIDE; ARSENIC ACID; CARBONYL DERIVATIVE; NANOFILM; POLYAMIDE; POLYSULFONE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ARTICLE; ATTENUATED TOTAL REFLECTION FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; CHANNEL GATING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; ELECTROMIGRATION; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; IONIC STRENGTH; MEMBRANE FILTER; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; NANOFILTRATION; OPERATING PRESSURE; PH; POLARIZATION; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE CHARGE; SURFACE PROPERTY; THERMODYNAMICS; TITRIMETRY;

EID: 84887726462     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.056     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Capelle N., Moulin P., Charbit F., Gallo R. Purification of heterocyclic drug derivatives from concentrated saline solution by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 196:125-141.
2. Sheth J.P., Qin Y., Sirkar K.K., Baltzis B.C. Nanofiltration-based diafiltration process for solvent exchange in pharmaceutical manufacturing. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 211:251-261.
3. Gomes A.C., Goncalves I.C., Norberta de Pinho M. The role of adsorption on nanofiltration of azo dyes. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 255:157-165.
4. Garba Y., Taha S., Gondrexon N., Dorange G. Cadmium salts transport through a nanofiltration membrane: experimental results and model predictions. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 38:529-535.
5. Garba Y., Taha S., Gondrexon N., Cabon J., Dorange G. Mechanisms involved in cadmium salts transport through a nanofiltration membrane. Characterization and distribution. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 168:135-141.
6. Wang K.Y., Chung T.-S. Fabrication of polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for removal of chromate. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:307-315.
7. Lastra A., Gomez D., Romero J., Francisco J.L., Luque S., Alvarez J.R. Removal of metal complexes by nanofiltration in a TCF pulp mill: technical and economic feasibility. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 242:97-105.
8. Mohammad A.W., Othaman R., Hilal N. Potential use of nanofiltration membranes in treatment of industrial wastewater from Ni-P electroless plating. Desalination 2004, 168:241-252.
9. Thanuttamavong M., Yamamoto K., Oh J.I., Choo K.H., Choi S.J. Rejection characteristics of organic and inorganic pollutants by ultra low-pressure nanofiltration of surface water for drinking water treatment. Desalination 2002, 145:257-264.
10. Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Removal of pollutants from surface water and groundwater by nanofiltration: overview of possible applications in the drinking water industry. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 122:435-445.
11. Kedem O., Katchalsky A. Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to nonelectrolytes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1958, 27:229-246.
12. Wang X.-L., Tsuru T., Nakao S.-i., Kimura S. Electrolyte transport through nanofiltration membranes by the space-charge model and the comparison with Teorell-Meyer-Sievers model. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 103:117-133.
13. Bowen W.R., Mukhtar H. Characterization and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 112:263-274.
14. Geraldes V., Semiao V., de Pinho M.N. Flow and mass transfer modelling of nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 191:109-128.
15. Yaroshchuk A.E. Rejection of single salts versus transmembrane volume flow in RO/NF: thermodynamic properties, model of constant coefficients, and its modification. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 198:285-297.
16. Wang X.-L., Tsuru T., Nakao S.-i., Kimura S. The electrostatic and steric-hindrance model for the transport of charged solutes through nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 135:19-32.
17. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W., Hilal N. Characterization of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes-use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 126:91-105.
18. Schaep J., Vandecasteele C., Mohammad A.W., Bowen W.R. Modeling the retention of ionic components for different nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2001, 22,23:169-179.
19. Lee S., Lueptow R.M. Membrane rejection of nitrogen compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35:3008-3018.
20. Garba Y., Taha S., Cabon J., Dorange G. Modeling of cadmium salts rejection through a nanofiltration membrane: relationships between solute concentration and transport parameters. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 211:51-58.
21. Labbez C., Fievet P., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A., Foissy A., Pagetti J. Retention of mineral salts by a polyamide nanofiltration membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2003, 30:47-55.
22. Szymczyk A., Labbez C., Fievet P., Vidonne A., Foissy A., Pagetti J. Contribution of convection, diffusion and migration to electrolyte transport through nanofiltration membranes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 103:77-94.
23. Oh J.I., Urase T., Kitawaki H., Rahman M.M., Rhahman M.H., Yamamoto K. Modeling of arsenic rejection considering affinity and steric hindrance effect in nanofiltration membranes. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 42:173-180.
24. Vrijenhoek E.M., Waypa J.J. Arsenic removal from drinking water by a "loose" nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2000, 130:265-277.
25. Seidel A., Waypa J.J., Elimelech M. Role of charge (Donnan) exclusion in removal of arsenic from water by a negatively charged porous nanofiltration membrane. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2001, 18:105-113.
26. Sato Y., Kang M., Kamei T., Magara Y. Performance of nanofiltration for arsenic removal. Water Res. 2002, 36:3371-3377.
27. Saitua H., Campderros M., Cerutti S., Padilla A.P. Effect of operating conditions in removal of arsenic from water by nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2005, 172:173-180.
28. Nguyen C.M., Bang S., Cho J., Kim K.-W. Performance and mechanism of arsenic removal from water by a nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2009, 245:82-94.
29. Figoli A., Cassano A., Criscuoli A., Mozumder M.S.I., Uddin M.T., Islam M.A., Drioli E. Influence of operating parameters on the arsenic removal by nanofiltration. Water Res. 2010, 44:97-104.
30. Fang J., Deng B. Arsenic removal by membrane processes: modeling and applications. Membrane Technology and Environmental Applications 2012, 348-381. American Society of Civil Engineers. T.C. Zhang (Ed.).
31. J.G. Hering, M. Elimelech, Arsenic Removal by Enhanced Coagulation and Membrane Processes, 1997, 188 pp.
32. Ghurye G., Clifford D. As(III) oxidation using chemical and solid-phase oxidants. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 2004, 96:84-96.
33. Vasudevan S., Mohan S., Sozhan G., Raghavendran N.S., Murugan C.V. Studies on the oxidation of As(III) to As(V) by in-situ generated hypochlorite. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45:7729-7732.
34. Criscuoli A., Majumdar S., Figoli A., Sahoo G.C., Bafaro P., Bandyopadhyay S., Drioli E. As(III) oxidation by MnO2 coated PEEK-WC nanostructured capsules. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 211-212:281-287.
35. Dubois M., Gilles K.A., Hamilton J.K., Rebers P.A., Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28:350-356.
36. Zydney A.L. Stagnant film model for concentration polarization in membrane systems. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 130:275-281.
37. Sutzkover I., Hasson D., Semiat R. Simple technique for measuring the concentration polarization level in a reverse osmosis system. Desalination 2000, 131:117-127.
38. Le X.C., Ma M.S., Wong N.A. Speciation of arsenic compounds using HPLC at elevated temperature and selective hydride-generation atomic fluorescence detection. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68:4501-4506.
39. Gu Z., Fang J., Deng B. Preparation and evaluation of GAC-based iron-containing adsorbents for arsenic removal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39:3833-3843.
40. Schaep J., Vandecasteele C., Mohammad A.W., Bowen W.R. Analysis of the salt retention of nanofiltration membranes using the Donnan-steric partitioning pore model. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1999, 34:3009-3030.
41. Coates J. Interpretation of infrared spectra, a practical approach. Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry 2000, 10815-10837. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. R.A. Meyers (Ed.).
42. Kang G., Liu M., Lin B., Cao Y., Yuan Q. A novel method of surface modification on thin-film composite reverse osmosis membrane by grafting poly (ethylene glycol). Polymer 2007, 48:1165-1170.
43. Freger V., Gilron J., Belfer S. TFC polyamide membranes modified by grafting of hydrophilic polymers: an FT-IR/AFM/TEM study. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 209:283-292.
44. Belfer S., Fainchtain R., Purinson Y., Kedem O. Surface characterization by FTIR-ATR spectroscopy of polyethersulfone membranes-unmodified, modified and protein fouled. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 172:113-124.
45. Stumm W., Morgan J.J. Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural Waters 1996, 1022. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 3rd ed.
46. Hagmeyer G., Gimbel R. Modelling the rejection of nanofiltration membrane using zeta potential measurements. Sep. Purif. Technol. 1999, 15:19-30.
47. Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34:3710-3716.
48. Paugam L., Taha S., Dorange G., Jaouen P., Quemeneur F. Mechanism of nitrate ions transfer in nanofiltration depending on pressure, pH, concentration and medium composition. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 231:37-46.
49. Diawara C.K., Paugam L., Pontie M. Influence of chloride, nitrate, and sulphate on the removal of fluoride ions by using nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005, 40:3339-3347.
50. Vellenga E., Traegardh G. Nanofiltration of combined salt and sugar solutions: coupling between retentions. Desalination 1998, 120:211-220.
51. Wang X.-L., Zhang C., Ouyang P. The possibility of separating saccharides from a NaCl solution by using nanofiltration in diafiltration mode. Journal of Membrane Science 2002, 204:271-281.
52. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W. Diafiltration by nanofiltration: prediction and optimization. AIChE J. 1998, 44:1799-1812.
53. Chaabane T., Taha S., Taleb Ahmed M., Maachi R., Dorange G. Coupled model of file theory and the Nernst-Planck equation in nanofiltration. Desalination 2007, 206:424-432.
54. Fievet P., Labbez C., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A., Foissy A., Pagetti J. Electrolyte transport through amphoteric nanofiltration membranes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57:2921-2931.
55. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W. Characterization and prediction of nanofiltration membrane performance-a general assessment. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1998, 76:885-893.