Information theory reveals that individual birds do not alter song complexity when varying song length

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 87, Issue C, 2014, Pages 153-163

  Palmero, Ana María ^a,b   Espelosín, Jesús ^b   Laiolo, Paola ^c   Illera, Juan Carlos ^a,c  

^a INSTITUTO DE PRODUCTOS NATURALES Y AGROBIOLOGÍA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Animal communication; Bout length; Information theory; Internal complexity; Spectacled warbler

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887636265     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.10.026     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Baker M.C., Thompson D.B., Sherman G.L., Cunningham M.A. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology: the role of male vs male interactions in maintaining population dialect structure. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1981, 8:65-69.
2. Beecher M.D., Brenowitz E.A. Functional aspects of song learning in songbirds. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2005, 20:143-149.
3. Beecher M., Campbell S., Burt J., Hill C., Nordby J. Song-type matching between neighbouring song sparrows. Animal Behaviour 2000, 59:21-27.
4. Berwick R.C., Okanoya K., Beckers G.J.L., Bolhuis J.J. Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2011, 15:113-121.
5. Bradbury J.W., Vehrencamp S.L. Principles of animal communication 1998, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
6. Briefer E., Osiejuk T.S., Rybak F., Aubin T. Are bird song complexity and song sharing shaped by habitat structure? An information theory and statistical approach. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2010, 262:151-164.
7. Buchanan K.L., Catchpole C.K. Female choice in the sedge warbler, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus: multiple cues from song and territory quality. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 1997, 264:521-526.
8. Buchanan K.L., Leitner S., Spencer K.A., Goldsmith A.R., Catchpole C.K. Developmental stress selectively affects the song control nucleus HVC in the zebra finch. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2004, 271:2381-2386.
9. Caro T. Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals 2005, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
10. Catchpole C.K. Temporal and sequential organization of song in the sedge warbler (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus). Behaviour 1976, 59:226-246.
11. Catchpole C.K. Song repertoires and reproductive success in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1986, 19:439-445.
12. Catchpole C.K. Song and female choice: good genes and big brains?. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 1996, 11:358-360.
13. Catchpole C.K., Slater P.J.B. Birdsong: biological themes and variations 2008, Cambridge University Press, New York. 2nd ed.
14. Chappell M.A., Zuk M., Kwan T.H., Johnsen T.S. Energy cost of an avian vocal display: crowing in red junglefowl. Animal Behaviour 1995, 49:255-257.
15. Collins S.A., De Kort S.R., Pérez-Tris J., Tellería J.L. Migration strategy and divergent sexual selection on bird song. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2009, 276:585-590.
16. Cramer E.R.A. Physically challenging song traits, male quality, and reproductive success in house wrens. PLoS One 2013, 8:e59208.
17. Cramp S. Birds of the Western Palearctic 1992, Vol. 6. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Cuthill I.C., Stevens M., Windsor A.M.M., Walker H.J. The effects of pattern symmetry on the antipredator effectiveness of disruptive and background matching coloration. Behavioral Ecology 2006, 17:828-832.
19. Da Silva M.L., Piqueira J.R.C., Vielliard J.M.E. Using Shannon Entropy on measuring the individual variability in the rufous-bellied thrush Turdus rufiventris vocal communication. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2000, 207:57-64.
20. Da Silva M.L., Vielliard J.M.E. Entropy calculations for measuring bird song diversity: the case of the white-vented violet-ear (Colibri serrirostris) (Aves, Trochilidae). Razprave IV. Razreda Sazu 2006, 47:37-49.
21. Diebold A.R. Anthropological perspectives. Animal communication 1968, 541. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. T.A. Sebeok (Ed.).
22. Dobson C.W., Lemon R.E. Markov sequences in songs of American thrushes. Behaviour 1978, 68:86-104.
23. Doupe A.J., Kuhl P.K. Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1999, 22:567-631.
24. Doutrelant C., Blondel J., Perret P., Lambrechts M.M. Blue tit song repertoire size, male quality and interspecific competition. Journal of Avian Biology 2000, 31:360-366.
25. Doyle L.R., McCowan B., Johnston S., Hanser S.F. Information theory, animal communication, and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. Acta Astronautica 2011, 68:406-417.
26. Eberhardt L.S. Consumption during singing by male Carolina wrens (Thryothorus ludovicianus). The Auk 1994, 111:124-130.
27. Feßl B., Hoi H. Song complexity and song structure in the moustached warbler Acrocephalus melanopogon. Journal of Avian Biology 2000, 31:144-150.
28. Ficken M.S., Hailman E.D., Hailman J.P. The chick-a-dee call system of the Mexican chickadee. The Condor 1994, 96:70-82.
29. Franco P., Slabbekoorn H. Repertoire size and composition in great tits: a flexibility test using playbacks. Animal Behaviour 2009, 77:261-269.
30. Galeotti P., Saino N., Sacchi R., Møller A.P. Song correlates with social context, testosterone and body condition in male barn swallows. Animal Behaviour 1997, 53:687-700.
31. Garamszegi L.Z. Age-dependent health status and song characteristics in the barn swallow. Behavioral Ecology 2005, 16:580-591.
32. Gentner T., Hulse S. Perceptual mechanisms for individual vocal recognition in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. Animal Behaviour 1998, 56:579-594.
33. Gil D., Gahr M. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2002, 17:133-141.
34. Hailman J.P., Ficken M.S., Ficken R.W. The 'chick-a-dee' calls of Parus atricapillus: a recombinant system of animal communication compared with written English. Semiotica 1985, 56:191-224.
35. Haldane J.B.S., Spurway H. Astatistical analysis of communication in Apis mellifera and a comparison with communication in other animals. Insectes Sociaux 1954, 1:247-283.
36. Hamao S. Syntactical complexity of songs in the black-browed reed warbler Acrocephalus bistrigiceps. Ornithological Science 2008, 7:173-177.
37. Hartshorne C. The monotony-threshold in singing birds. Auk 1956, 73:176-192.
38. Hazlett B.A., Bossert W.H. Astatistical analysis of the aggressive communications systems of some hermit crabs. Animal Behaviour 1965, 13:357-373.
39. Hultsch H., Todt D. Repertoire sharing and song-post distance in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos B.). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1981, 8:183-188.
40. Hultsch H., Todt D. Learning to sing. Nature's music. The science of birdsong 2004, 80-107. Elsevier Academic Press, New York. P. Marler, H. Slabbekoorn (Eds.).
41. Illera J. Habitat selection by the Canary Islands stonechat (Saxicola dacotiae) (Meade-Waldo, 1889) in Fuerteventura Island: a two-tier habitat approach with implications for its conservation. Biological Conservation 2001, 97:339-345.
42. Illera J.C., Díaz M. Reproduction in an endemic bird of a semiarid island: a food-mediated process. Journal of Avian Biology 2006, 37:447-456.
43. Ince S.A., Slater P.J.B. Versatility and continuity in the song of thrushes Turdus spp. Ibis 1985, 127:355-364.
44. Koetz A.H., Westcott D.A., Congdon B.C. Spatial pattern of song element sharing and its implications for song learning in the chowchilla, Orthonyx spaldingii. Animal Behaviour 2007, 74:1019-1028.
45. Kroodsma D.E. Ecology of passerine song development. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds 1996, 3-19. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. D.E. Kroodsma, E.H. Miller (Eds.).
46. Lachlan R.F., Servedio M.R. Song learning accelerates allopatric speciation. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution 2004, 58:2049-2063.
47. Lachlan R.F., Slater P.J.B. Song learning by chaffinches: how accurate, and from where?. Animal Behaviour 2003, 65:957-969.
48. Laiolo P., Tella J.L. Habitat fragmentation affects culture transmission: patterns of song matching in Dupont's lark. Journal of Applied Ecology 2005, 42:1183-1193.
49. Laiolo P., Tella J.L. Landscape bioacoustics allow detection of the effects of habitat patchiness on population structure. Ecology 2006, 87:1203-1214.
50. Laiolo P., Tella J.L., Carrete M., Serrano D., López G. Distress calls may honestly signal bird quality to predators. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Supplement 2004, 271:S513-S515.
51. Leger D.W., Brooks K.E., O'Brien J.E. Versatility from a single song: the case of the nightingale wren. The Auk 2000, 117:1038-1042.
52. Lemon R., Chatfield C. Organization of song of rose-breasted grosbeaks. Animal Behaviour 1973, 21:28-44.
53. Martín A., Lorenzo J.A. Aves del Archipiélago Canario 2001, Francisco Lemus, La Laguna, Tenerife.
54. McCowan B., Doyle L.R., Hanser S.F. Using information theory to assess the diversity, complexity, and development of communicative repertoires. Journal of Comparative Psychology 2002, 116:166-172.
55. McCowan B., Doyle L.R., Jenkins J.M., Hanser S.F. The appropriate use of Zipf's law in animal communication studies. Animal Behaviour 2005, 69:F1-F7.
56. McCowan B., Hanser S., Doyle L. Quantitative tools for comparing animal communication systems: information theory applied to bottlenose dolphin whistle repertoires. Animal Behaviour 1999, 57:409-419.
57. McCowan B., Reiss D. Quantitative comparison of whistle repertoires from captive adult bottlenose dolphins (Delphinidae, Tursiops truncatus): a re-evaluation of the signature whistle hypothesis. Ethology 1995, 100:194-209.
58. McCowan B., Reiss D. Whistle contour development in captive-born infant bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): role of learning. Journal of Comparative Psychology 1995, 109:242-260.
59. Morton E.S. The effects of distance and isolation on song-type sharing in the Carolina wren. Wilson Bulletin 1987, 99:601-610.
60. Nottebohm F. Ontogeny of bird song. Science 1970, 167:950-956.
61. Nowicki S., Hasselquist D., Bensch S., Peters S. Nestling growth and song repertoire size in great reed warblers: evidence for song learning as an indicator mechanism in mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2000, 267:2419-2424.
62. Nowicki S., Peters S., Podos J. Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in songbirds. Integrative and Comparative Biology 1998, 38:179-190.
63. Nowicki S., Peters S., Searcy W., Clayton C. The development of within-song type variation in song sparrows. Animal Behaviour 1999, 57:1257-1264.
64. Nowicki S., Searcy W.A. Song and mate choice in birds: how the development of behaviour helps us understand function. The Auk 2005, 122:1-14.
65. Oberweger K., Goller F. The metabolic cost of birdsong production. The Journal of Experimental Biology 2001, 204:3379-3388.
66. Osiejuk T.S., Ratyńska K., Cygan J.P., Dale S. Song structure and repertoire variation in ortolan bunting (Emberiza hortulana L.) from isolated Norwegian population. Annales Zoologici Fennici 2003, 40:3-16.
67. Palmero A.M., Illera J.C., Laiolo P. Song characterization in the spectacled warbler (Sylvia conspicillata): a circum-Mediterranean species with a complex song structure. Bioacoustics 2012, 21:175-191.
68. Palomino D. Caracterización y uso de hábitat de aves estepáricas en las islas orientales del archipiélago canario. Programa de seguimiento y planificación de especies amenazadas de canarias 'centinela' 2005, CSIC-Gobierno de Canarias, Tenerife.
69. Payevsky V.A. Breeding biology, morphometrics, and population dynamics of Sylvia warblers in the Eastern Baltic. Avian Ecology and Behaviour 1999, 2:19-50.
70. Podos J., Peters S., Tamia R., Marler P., Stephen N. The organization of song repertoires in song sparrows: themes and variations. Ethology 1992, 90:89-106.
71. R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2007, R Development Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Retrieved from:. http://www.r-project.orgs.
72. Rivera-Gutiérrez H.F., Matthysen E., Adriaensen F., Slabbekoorn H. Repertoire sharing and song similarity between great tit males decline with distance between forest fragments. Ethology 2010, 116:951-960.
73. Rodríguez D.O., García G.A., Reyes B.J.A. Estudio fitosociologico de la vegetacion actual de Fuerteventura (Islas Canarias). Vieraea 2000, 28:61-98.
74. Searcy W., Andersson M. Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1986, 17:507-533.
75. Shannon C. Amathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 1948, 27:379-423. 623-656.
76. Shannon C., Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication 1949, University of Illinois Press, Chicago.
77. Shirihai H., Gargallo G., Helbig A.J., Harris A., Cottridge D. Sylvia warblers. Identification, taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Sylvia 2001, Christopher Helm/A. & C. Black, London.
78. Slater P.J. The cultural transmission of bird song. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 1986, 1:94-97.
79. Soma M., Takahasi M., Hasegawa T., Okanoya K. Trade-offs and correlations among multiple song features in the Bengalese finch. Ornithological Science 2006, 5:77-84.
80. Suzuki R., Buck J.R., Tyack P.L. Information entropy of humpback whale songs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 119:1849-1866.
81. Szekely T., Catchpole C.K., Devoogd A., Marchl Z., Devoogd T.J. Evolutionary changes in a song control area of the brain (HVC) are associated with evolutionary changes in song repertoire among European warblers (Sylviidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society B 1996, 263:607-610.
82. Trillo P.A., Vehrencamp S.L. Song types and their structural features are associated with specific contexts in the banded wren. Animal Behaviour 2005, 70:921-935.
83. Wilson P.L., Towner M.C., Vehrencamp S.L. Survival and song-type sharing in a sedentary subespecies of the song sparrow. The Condor 2000, 102:355-363.
84. Wilson P.L., Vehrencamp S.L. Atest of the deceptive mimicry hypothesis in song-sharing song sparrows. Animal Behaviour 2001, 62:1197-1205.
85. Zipf G.K. Human behavior and the principle of least effort 1949, Addison-Wesley Press, Cambridge, MA.