Are bird song complexity and song sharing shaped by habitat structure? An information theory and statistical approach

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 262, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 151-164

  Briefer, Elodie ^a   Osiejuk, Tomasz S ^b   Rybak, Fanny ^a   Aubin, Thierry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Bird song; Entropy; Habitat fragmentation; Skylark; Zipf's law

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXITY; ENTROPY; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT STRUCTURE; POPULATION DECLINE; SONG; SONGBIRD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT STRUCTURE; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; INFORMATION SCIENCE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKYLARK; SONG COMPLEXITY; SONG SHARING; SONGBIRD; SPECIES HABITAT; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; GEOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOUND DETECTION; TERRITORIALITY; VOCALIZATION;

ALAUDA; AVES; PASSERI;

ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; GEOGRAPHY; HIERARCHY, SOCIAL; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SONGBIRDS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; TERRITORIALITY; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 76449089818     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.09.020     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Andrén H. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 1994, 71:355-366.
2. Aubin, T., 1981. Etude Expérimentale du Chant Territorial de l'Alouette des Champs (Alauda arvensis L.). Caractéristiques physiques, valeur sémantique et spécificité. Ph.D. thesis, University of Besançon, Nancy 1, Strasbourg.
3. Aubin T. Habituation au chant territorial chez l'alouette des champs (Alauda arvensis L.); rÔle de la diversité et de la monotonie. Biol. Behav. 1982, 7:353-362.
4. Aubin T., Brémond J.-C. The process of species-specific song recognition in the skylark Alauda arvensis. An experimental study by means of synthesis. Z. Tierpsychol. 1983, 61:141-152.
5. Baker A.J., Jenkins P.F. Founder effect and cultural evolution of songs in an isolated population of chaffinches, Fringilla coelebs, in the Chatham Islands. Anim. Behav. 1987, 35:1793-1803.
6. Baker M.C., Thompson D.B., Sherman G.L., Cunningham M.A. The role of male interactions in maintaining population dialect structure. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1981, 8:65-69.
7. Baker M.C., Baker M.S.A., Tilghman L.M. Differing effects of isolation on evolution of bird songs: examples from an island-mainland comparison of three species. Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 2006, 89:331-342.
8. Becker P.H. Der Gesang von Winter und Sommergoldhähnchen (Regulus regulus, Regulus ignicapillus) am westlichen. Bodensee. Vogelwarte 1974, 27:233-243.
9. Beecher M.D., Campbell S.E., Nordby J.C. Territory tenure in song sparrows is related to song sharing with neighbors, but not to repertoire size. Anim. Behav. 2000, 59:29-37.
10. Beecher M.D., Brenowitz E.A. Functional aspects of song learning in songbirds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:143-149.
11. Bender D.J., Contreras T.A., Fahrig L. Habitat loss and population decline: a meta-analysis of the patch size effect. Ecology 1998, 79:517-533.
12. BirdLife International, 2008. Species factsheet: Alauda arvensis. Downloaded from on 18/6/2008. http://www.birdlife.org.
13. Bitterbaum E., Baptista L.F. Geographical variation in songs of Carolina House Finches (Carpodacus mexicanus). Auk 1979, 96:462-474.
14. Briefer E., Aubin T., Lehongre K., Rybak F. How to identify dear-enemies: the group signature in the complex song of the skylark Alauda arvensis. J. Exp. Biol. 2008, 211:317-326.
15. Buchanan K.L., Spencer K.A., Goldsmith A.R., Catchpole C.K. Song is an honest signal of past developmental stress in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Proc. R. Soc. B 2003, 270:1149-1156.
16. Busche G. Drastische Bestandseinbussen des Feldlerche Alauda arvensis auf Grünlandflachen in Schleswig-Holstein. Vogelwelt 1989, 110:51-59.
17. Catchpole C.K. Sexual selection and the evolution of complex songs among European warblers of the genus Acrocephalus. Behaviour 1980, 74:149-166.
18. Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations 1995, 45-69. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 131-137; 196-218. C.K. Catchpole, P.J. Slater (Eds.).
19. Chamberlain D.E., Gregory R.D. Coarse and fine scale habitat associations of breeding skylarks Alauda arvensis in the UK. Bird Study 1999, 46:34-47.
20. Chessel D., Dufour A.-B., Thioulouse J. The ade4 package-I-One-table methods. R. News 2004, 4:5-10.
21. Cytel Software Corp., 1997. StatXact v3.1. Cytel Software Corporation, Cambridge.
22. Da Silva M.L., Piqueira J.R.C., Vielliard J.M.E. Using Shannon entropy on measuring the individual variability in the rufous-bellied thrush Turdus rufiventris vocal communication. J. Theor. Biol. 2000, 207:57-64.
23. Debinski D.M., Holt R.D. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conser. Biol. 2000, 14:342-355.
24. Delius J.D. Das Verhalten der Feldlerche. Z. Tierpsychol. 1963, 20:297-348.
25. Diniz-Filho J.A.F., Tellez M.P. Spatial autocorrelation analysis and the identification of operational units for conservation in continuous populations. Conserv. Biol. 2002, 16:924-935.
26. Dobson C.W., Lemon R.E. Markov sequences in songs of American thrushes. Behaviour 1978, 68:86-104.
27. Donald, P.F., 2004. Song and song flight. In: The Skylark. T and AD Poyser, London, pp. 72-88.
28. Eraud, C., Boutin, J.-M., 2001. Ecologie de l'alouette des champs (Alauda arvensis) et perspectives de conservation des populations. In: Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage (Ed.), Rapport Scientifique 2000. Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Paris, pp. 51-53.
29. Ficken M.S., Hailman E.D., Hailman J.P. The chick-a-dee call system of the Mexican chickadee. Condor 1994, 96:70-82.
30. Gentner T.Q., Hulse S.H. Perceptual mechanisms for individual vocal recognition in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. Anim. Behav. 1998, 56:579-594.
31. Goodfellow D.J., Slater P.J.B. A model of bird song dialects. Anim. Behav. 1986, 34:1579-1580.
32. Griessmann B., Naguib M. Song sharing in neighboring and non-neighboring thrush nightingales (Luscina luscina) and its implications for communication. Ethology 2002, 108:377-387.
33. Hailman J.P., Ficken J.P., Ficken R.W. The 'chick-a-dee' calls of Parus articapillus: a recombinant system of animal communication compared with written English. Semiotica 1985, 56:191-224.
34. Hausberger M. Social influences on song acquisition and sharing in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Social Influences on Vocal Development 1997, 128-156. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C.T. Snowdon, M. Hausberger (Eds.).
35. Hedenström A. Song flight performance in the skylark Alauda arvensis. J. Avian Biol. 1995, 26:337-342.
36. Holland J., McGregor P.K., Rowe C.L. Changes in microgeographic song variation of the corn bunting Miliaria calandra. J. Avian Biol. 1996, 27:1059-1061.
37. Howard R.D. The influence of a sexual selection and interspecific competition on mokingbirds song (Mimus polyglottos). Evolution 1974, 28:428-438.
38. Hultsch H., Todt D. Repertoire sharing and song post distance in nightingales. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1981, 8:182-188.
39. Hurlbert S.H. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Mono. 1984, 54:187-211.
40. Ince S.A., Slater P.J.B. Versatility and continuity in the songs of thrushes Turdus spp. Ibis 1985, 127:355-364.
41. Isaac D., Marler P. Ordering of sequences of singing behaviour of mistle thrushes in relationship to timing. Anim. Behav. 1963, 11:179-188.
42. Jenny M. Populationsdynamik der Feldlerche Alauda arvensis in einer intensive genutzten Agrarlandschaft des schweizerischen Mittellandes. Orn. Beob. 1990, 87:153-163.
43. Jurasinski, G., 2007. Simba: a collection of functions for similarity calculation of binary data. R Package Version 0.2-5.
44. Kipper S., Mundry R., Sommer C., Hultsch H., Todt D. Song repertoire size is correlated with body measures and arrival date in common nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos. Anim. Behav. 2006, 71:211-217.
45. Koetz A.H., Westcott D.A., Congdon B.C. Spatial pattern of song element sharing and its implications for song learning in the chowchilla, Orthonyx spaldingii. Anim. Behav. 2007, 74:1019-1028.
46. Kreutzer M. Stéréotypies et variations dans les chants de proclamation territoriale chez le Troglodyte (Troglodytes troglodytes). Rev. Comp. Anim. 1974, 8:270-286.
47. Kroodsma D.E. Song patterning in the rock wren. Condor 1975, 77:294-303.
48. Kroodsma D.E. Continuity and versatility in bird song: support for the monotony-threshold hypothesis. Nature 1978, 274:681-683.
49. Kroodsma D.E. Winter Wren singing behavior: a pinnacle of song complexity. Condor 1981, 82:357-365.
50. Kroodsma D.E. Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds 1996, 3-19. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 125-147. D.E. Kroodsma, E.H. Miller (Eds.).
51. Lachlan R.F., Slater P.J.B. Song learning by chaffinches: how accurately and from where? A simulation analysis of patterns of geographical variation. Anim. Behav. 2003, 65:957-969.
52. Laiolo P., Tella J.L. Habitat fragmentation affects culture transmission: patterns of song matching in Dupont's lark. J. Appl. Ecol. 2005, 42:1183-1193.
53. Laiolo P., Tella J.L. Erosion of animal cultures in fragmented landscapes. Front. Ecol. Env. 2007, 5:68-72.
54. Laiolo P., Vögeli M., Serrano D., Tella J.L. Song diversity predicts the viability of fragmented bird populations. Plos-One 2008, 3:e1822.
55. Lambrechts M.M., Dhondt A.A. Individual voice discrimination in birds. Curr. Ornithol. 1995, 12:115-139.
56. Lampe H.M., Espmark Y.E. Song structure reflects male quality in pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca). Anim. Behav. 1994, 47:869-876.
57. Lehongre K., Aubin T., Robin S., Del Negro C. Individual signature in canary songs: contribution of multiple levels of song structure. Ethology 2008, 114:425-435.
58. Leitner S., Voigt C., Gahr M. Seasonal changes in the song pattern of the non-domesticated island canary (Serinus canaria), a field study. Behaviour 2001, 138:885-904.
59. Lemon R.E., Chatfield C. Organization of song in Cardinals. Anim. Behav. 1971, 19:1-17.
60. Lemon R.E., Chatfield C. Organization of song of Rose-breasted Grosbeaks. Anim. Behav. 1973, 21:28-44.
61. Lynch A. The population memetics of birdsong. Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds 1996, 181-197. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York. D.E. Kroodsma, E.H. Miller (Eds.).
62. Loffredo C.A., Borgia G. Male courtship vocalization as cues for mate choice in the satin bowerbird, Ptilonorhynchus violaceaus. Auk 1986, 103:189-195.
63. Mandelbrot B. Contribution à la théorie mathématique des jeux de communication. Publ. L'inst. Stat. L'Univ. Paris 1953, 2:5-50.
64. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 1967, 27:209-220.
65. Marler P., Sherman V. Innate differences in singing behavior of sparrows reared in isolation from adult conspecific song. Anim. Behav. 1985, 33:57-71.
66. McCowan B., Doyle L.R., Hanser S.F. Using information theory to assess the diversity, complexity, and development of communication repertoires. J. Comp. Psychol. 2002, 116:166-172.
67. Morton E.S. The effect of distance and isolation on song-type sharing in the Carolina wren. Wilson Bull. 1987, 99:601-610.
68. Mulligan J.A. Singing behavior and its development in the song sparrow, Melospiza melodia. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 1966, 81:1-76.
69. Mundinger P.C. Microgeographic and macrogeographic variation in the acquired vocalizations of birds. Acoustic Communication in Birds II 1982, 147-208. Academic Press, New York. D.E. Kroodsma, E.H. Miller (Eds.).
70. Mundry R. Testing related samples with missing values: a permutation approach. Anim. Behav. 1999, 58:1143-1153.
71. Naguib M. Singing interactions in songbirds: implications for social relations and territorial settlement. Animal Communication Networks 2005, 300-319. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P. McGregor (Ed.).
72. Naugler C.T., Smith P.C. Song similarity in an isolated population of fox sparrow (Passerella iliaca). Condor 1991, 93:1001-1003.
73. Nordby J.C., Campbell S.E., Beecher M.D. Ecological correlates of song learning in song sparrows. Behav. Ecol. 1999, 10:287-297.
74. Nottebohm F. The song of the chingolo (Zonotrichia capensi) in Argentina: description and evaluation of a system of dialects. Condor 1969, 71:299-315.
75. Nottebohm F., Nottebohm M.E. Relationship between song repertoire and age in the canary, Serinus canarius. Z. Tierpsychol. 1978, 46:298-305.
76. Nowicki S., Hasselquist D., Bensch S., Peters S. Nestling growth and song repertoire size in great reed warblers: evidence for song learning as an indicator mechanism in mate choice. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2000, 267:2419-2424.
77. Odderskaer P., Prang A., Poulsen J.G., Andersen P.N., Elmegaard N. Skylarks (Alauda arvensis) utilisation of micro-habitats in spring barley fields. Agric. Ecos. Env. 1997, 62:21-29.
78. Opdam P., Foppen R., Reijnen R., Schotman A. The landscape ecological approach in bird conservation: integrating the metapopulation concept into spatial planning. Ibis 1994, 137:139-146.
79. Osiejuk T.S., Ratyńska K., Cygan J.P., Dale S. Song structure and repertoire variation in Ortolan Bunting (Emberiza hortulana L.) from isolated Norwegian population. Ann. Zool. Fen. 2003, 40:3-16.
80. R Development Core Team, 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
81. Rossi J.P. Statistical tool for soil biology. 11. Autocorrelogram and Mantel test. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 1996, 32:195-203.
82. Saunders D.A., Hobbs R.J., Margules C.R. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv. Biol. 1991, 5:18-32.
83. Schmiegelow F.K.A., Monkkonen M. Habitat loss and fragmentation in dynamic landscapes: avian perspectives from the boreal forest. Ecol. Appl. 2002, 12:375-389.
84. Schottler B. Songs of blue tits Parus caeruleus palmensis from las Palmas (Canary Islands)-a test of hypotheses. Bioacoustics 1995, 6:135-152.
85. Shannon C. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948, 27:379-423. 623-656.
86. Shannon C., Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication 1949, University of Illinois Press, Chicago.
87. Slater P.J.B. Bird song learning: causes and consequences. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 1989, 1:19-43.
88. Sokal R.R., Neal O. Spatial autocorrelation in biology. II. Some implications and four applications of evolutionary interest. Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 1978, 10:229-249.
89. Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J., 1995. In: Freeman, W.H. (Ed.), Biometry III, New York.
90. Specht R. Avisoft-SASLab pro v4.31 2004, Avisoft, Berlin.
91. Statistica v6.0. for Windows (Computer program manual) 2001, StatSoft, Inc., StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma.
92. Stawarczyk T. Barycz Valley. Important Bird Areas of European Union Importance in Poland 2004, 432-434. Polish Society for the Protection of Birds, BirdLife partner in Poland, Warszawa. P.O. Sidlo, B. Blaszkowska, P. Chylarecki (Eds.).
93. Stoddard P.K. Vocal recognition of neighbors by territorial Passerines. Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds 1996, 356-374. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York. D.E. Kroodsma, E.H. Miller (Eds.).
94. Suggs D.N., Simmons A.M. Information theory analysis of patterns of modulation in the advertisement call of the male bullfrog, Rana castebeiana. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2005, 117:2330-2337.
95. Suzuki R., Buck J.R., Tyack P.L. Information entropy of humpback whale songs. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2005, 119:1849-1866.
96. Trainer J.M. Changes in song dialect distributions and microgeographic variation in song of white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys nuttalli). Auk 1983, 100:568-582.
97. Tryjanowski P. Changes in breeding populations of some farmland birds in W Poland in relation to changes in crop structure, weather conditions and number of predators. Folia Zool. 2000, 49:305-315.
98. Tryjanowski P. Skylark-Alauda arvensis. The Atlas of Breeding Birds in Poland 1985-2004 2004, 318-319. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań. A. Sikora, Z. Rohde, M. Gromadzki, G. Neubauer, P. Chylarecki (Eds.).
99. Wildenthal J.L. Structure in primary song of the Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos). Auk 1965, 82:161-189.
100. Wilson P.L., Towner M.C., Vehrencamp S.L. Survival and song-type sharing in a sedentary subspecies of the song sparrow. Condor 2000, 102:355-363.
101. Zipf G.K. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort 1949, Addison-Wesley Press, Cambridge, MA.