Running-based taste aversion learning in five strains of rats

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 123, Issue , 2014, Pages 200-213

  Nakajima, Sadahiko ^a  

^a KWANSEI GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Conditioned taste aversion; Rats; Strain difference; Wheel running

Indexed keywords

GLUTAMATE SODIUM; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; LEARNING; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RAT STRAIN; RUNNING; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; SWEETNESS; TASTE AVERSION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); FLAVORING AGENTS; LOCOMOTION; RATS; RATS, INBRED F344; RATS, INBRED LEW; RATS, LONG-EVANS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; RATS, WISTAR; SACCHARIN; SODIUM GLUTAMATE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84887584150     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: 1873507X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Boakes R.A., Nakajima S. Conditioned taste aversions based on running or swimming. Conditioned taste aversion: behavioral and neural processes 2009, 159-178. Oxford Univ Press, New York. S. Reilly, T.R. Schachtman (Eds.).
2. Lett B.T., Grant V.L. Wheel running induces conditioned taste aversion in rats trained while hungry and thirsty. Physiol Behav 1996, 59:699-702.
3. Lett B.T., Grant V.L., Gaborko L.L. Wheel running simultaneously induces CTA and facilitates feeding in non-deprived rats. Appetite 1998, 31:351-360.
4. Eccles S., Kim E.-M., O'Hare E. Granisetron attenuates exercise-induced conditioned taste aversion in the rat. Appetite 2005, 44:325-328.
5. Forristall J.R., Hookey B.L., Grant V.L. Conditioned taste avoidance induced by forced and voluntary wheel running in rats. Behav Process 2007, 74:326-333.
6. Nakajima S., Hayashi H., Kato T. Taste aversion induced by confinement in a running wheel. Behav Process 2000, 49:35-42.
7. Hayashi H., Nakajima S., Urushihara K., Imada H. Taste avoidance caused by spontaneous wheel running: effects of duration and delay of wheel confinement. Learn. Motiv. 2002, 33:390-409.
8. Nakajima S., Urata T., Ogawa Y. Familiarization and cross-familiarization of wheel running and LiCl in conditioned taste aversion. Physiol Behav 2006, 88:1-11.
9. Masaki T., Nakajima S. Taste aversion in rats induced by forced swimming, voluntary running, forced running, and lithium chloride injection treatments. Physiol Behav 2006, 88:411-416.
10. Hughes S.C., Boakes R.A. Flavor preferences produced by backward pairing with wheel running. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2008, 34:283-293.
11. Heth C.D., Inglis P., Russell J.C., Pierce W.D. Conditioned taste aversion induced by wheel running is not due to novelty of the wheel. Physiol Behav 2001, 74:53-56.
12. Salvy S.-J., Pierce W.D., Heth D.C., Russell J.C. Pre-exposure to wheel running disrupts taste aversion conditioning. Physiol Behav 2002, 76:51-56.
13. Salvy S.-J., Pierce W.D., Heth D.C., Russell J.C. Taste avoidance induced by wheel running: effects of backward pairings and robustness of conditioned taste aversion. Physiol Behav 2004, 82:303-308.
14. Salvy S.-J., Heth D.C., Pierce W.D., Russell J.C. Conditioned taste aversion induced by wheel running: further evidence on wheel running duration. Behav Process 2004, 66:101-106.
15. Baysari M.T., Boakes R.A. Flavour aversion produced by running and attenuated by prior exposure to wheels. Q J Exp Psychol 2004, 57B:273-286.
16. Dwyer D.M., Boakes R.A., Hayward A.J. Reduced palatability in lithium- and activity-based, but not in amphetamine-based, taste aversion learning. Behav Neurosci 2008, 122:1051-1060.
17. Hashimoto A., Nakajima S. Contextual control of running-based taste aversion learning in rats. Psychol Rec 2013, 63:785-802.
18. Dragoin W.B. Conditioning and extinction of taste aversions with variations in intensity of the CS and UCS in two strains of rats. Psychon Sci 1971, 22:303-304.
19. Ader R. "Strain" differences in illness-induced taste aversion. Bull Psychon Soc 1974, 1:253-254.
20. Tordoff M.G., Alarcon L.K., Lawler M.P. Preferences of 14 rat strains for 17 taste compounds. Physiol Behav 2008, 95:308-332.
21. Lindsey J.R., Baker H.J. Historical foundations. The laboratory rat 2006, 1-52. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam. 2nd ed. M.A. Suckow, S.H. Weisbroth, C.L. Franklin (Eds.).
22. Rat genome database http://rgd.mcw.edu/.
23. Riley A.L., Davis C.M., Roma P.G. Strain differences in taste aversion learning: implications for animal model of drug abuse. Conditioned taste aversion: behavioral and neural processes 2009, 226-261. Oxford Univ Press, New York. S. Reilly, T.R. Schachtman (Eds.).
24. Cunningham C.L., Gremel C.M., Groblewski P.A. Genetic influences on conditioned taste aversion. Conditioned taste aversion: behavioral and neural processes 2009, 387-421. Oxford Univ Press, New York. S. Reilly, T.R. Schachtman (Eds.).
25. Bauer M.S. Intensity and precision of circadian wheel running in three outbred rat strains. Physiol Behav 1990, 47:397-401.
26. Midkiff E.E., Fitts D.A., Simpson J.B., Bernstein I.L. Absence of sodium chloride preference in Fischer-344 rats. Am J Physiol 1985, 249:R438-R442.
27. Sollars S.I., Sollars P.J., Bernstein I.L. Reversal of sodium chloride aversion of Fischer 344 rats by chorda tympani nerve transection. Behav Neurosci 1991, 105:603-605.
28. Dragoin W., McCleary G.E., McCleary P. A comparison of two methods of measuring conditioned taste aversions. Behav Res Methods Instrum 1971, 3:309-310.
29. Grote F.W., Brown R.T. Conditioned taste aversions: two stimulus tests are more sensitive than one-stimulus tests. Behav Res Methods Instrum 1971, 3:311-312.
30. Sidman M. Tactics of scientific research: evaluating experimental data in psychology 1960, Basic Books, New York.
31. Lancellotti D., Bayer B.M., Glowa J.R., Houghtling R.A., Riley A.L. Morphine-induced conditioned taste aversions in the LEW/N and F34/N rat strains. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2001, 68:603-610.
32. Pescatore K.A., Glowa J.R., Riley A.L. Strain differences in the acquisition of nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2005, 82:751-757.
33. Roma P.G., Flint W.W., Higley J.D., Riley A.L. Assessment of the aversive and rewarding effects of alcohol in Fischer and Lewis rats. Psychopharmacol 2006, 189:187-199.
34. Glowa J.R., Shaw A.E., Riley A.L. Cocaine-induced conditioned taste aversions: comparisons between effects in LEW/N and F344/N rat strains. Psychopharamacol 1994, 114:229-232.
35. Kosten T.A., Miserendino J.D., Chi S., Nestler E.J. Fischer and Lewis rat strains show differential cocaine effects in conditioned place preference and behavioral sensitization but not in locomotor activity or conditioned taste aversion. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1994, 269:137-144.
36. Grigson P.S., Freet C.S. The suppressive effects of sucrose and cocaine, but not lithium chloride, are greater in Lewis than in Fischer rats: evidence for the reward comparison hypothesis. Behav Neurosci 2000, 114:353-363.
37. Foynes M.M., Riley A.L. Lithium-chloride-induced conditioned taste aversions in the Lewis and Fischer 344 rat strains. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2004, 79:303-308.
38. Grant V.L., McDonald S.V., Sheppard R.C., Caldwell C.L., Heeley T.H., Brown A.R., et al. Dissociation of conditioned taste avoidance from conditioned disgust reactions induced by wheel running in rats. Behav Process 2012, 90:223-228.
39. Parker L.A. Taste avoidance and taste aversion: evidence for two different processes. Learn Behav 1995, 31:143-151.
40. Parker L.A., Limebeer C.L., Rana S.A. Conditioned disgust, but not conditioned taste avoidance, may reflect conditioned nausea in rats. Conditioned taste aversion: behavioral and neural processes 2009, 92-113. Oxford Univ Press, New York. S. Reilly, T.R. Schachtman (Eds.).
41. Dhabhar F.S., McEwen B.S., Spencer R.L. Stress response, adrenal steroid receptor levels and corticosteroid-binding globulin levels: a comparison between Sprague-Dawley, Fischer 344 and Lewis rats. Brain Res 1993, 616:89-98.
42. Grakalic I., Schindler C.W., Baumann M.H., Rice K.C., Riley A.L. Effects of stress modulation on morphine-induced conditioned place preferences and plasma corticosterone levels in Fischer, Lewis, and Sprague-Dawley rat strains. Psychopharmacol 2006, 189:277-286.
43. Stöhr T., Szuran T., Welzl H., Pliska V., Feldon J., Pryce C.R. Lewis/Fischer rat strain differences in endocrine and behavioural responses to environmental challenge. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2000, 67:809-819.
44. Elkins R.L. Separation of taste-aversion-prone and taste-aversion-resistant rats through selective breeding: implications for individual differences in conditionability and aversion-therapy alcoholism treatment. Behav Neurosci 1986, 100:121-126.
45. Elkins R.L., Walters P.A., Orr T.E. Continued development and unconditioned stimulus characterization of selectively bred lines of taste aversion prone and resistant rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1992, 16:928-934.
46. Elkins R.L., Harrison W. Rotation-induced taste aversions in strains of rats selectively bred for strong or weak acquisition of drug-induced taste aversion. Bull Psychon Soc 1983, 21:57-69.
47. Elkins R.L., Walters P.A., Harrison W.R., Albrecht W. Congruity of rotational and pharmacological taste aversion (TA) conditioning within strains of selectively bred TA prone and TA resistant rats. Learn Motiv 1990, 21:190-198.