Taste avoidance induced by wheel running: Effects of backward pairings and robustness of conditioned taste aversion

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 82, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 303-308

  Salvy, Sarah Jeanne ^a   Pierce, W David ^b   Heth, Donald C ^b   Russell, James C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c ALBERTA ENVIRONMENT AND PARKS   (Canada)

Author keywords

Backward conditioning; Conditioned taste aversion; Wheel running

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING; FLUID INTAKE; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REWARD; TASK PERFORMANCE; TASTE AVERSION; TASTE PREFERENCE;

EID: 3242811990     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Lett B.T., Grant V.L. Wheel running induces conditioned taste aversion in rats trained while hungry and thirsty. Physiol. Behav. 59:1996;699-702
2. Lett B.T., Grant V.L., Gaborko L.L. Wheel running simultaneously induces CTA and facilitates feeding in non-deprived rats. Appetite. 31:1998;351-360
3. Lett B.T., Grant V.L., Koh M.T., Smith J.F. Wheel running simultaneously produces conditioned taste aversion and conditioned place preference in rats. Learn. Motiv. 32:2001;129-136
4. Hayashi H., Nakajima S., Urushihara K., Imada H. Taste avoidance caused by spontaneous wheel running: effects of duration and delay of wheel confinement. Learn. Motiv. 33:2002;390-409
5. Heth C.D., Inglis P., Russell J.C., Pierce W.D. Conditioned taste aversion induced by wheel running is not due to novelty of the wheel. Physiol. Behav. 74:2001;53-56
6. Nakajima S., Hayashi H., Kato T. Taste aversion induced by confinement in a running wheel. Behav. Proc. 49:2000;35-42
7. Belke T.W., Heyman G.M. A matching law analysis of the reinforcing efficacy of wheel running in rats. Anim. Learn. Behav. 22:1994;267-274
8. Belke T.W. Running and responding reinforced by the opportunity to run: effect of reinforcer duration. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 67:1997;337-351
9. Belke T.W. Varying wheel running reinforcer duration within a session: effect on the revolution-postreinforcement pause relation. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 73:2000;225-239
10. Boer D.P., Epling W.F., Pierce W.D., Russell J.C. Suppression of food deprivation-induced high-rate wheel running in rats. Physiol. Behav. 48:1990;339-342
11. Collier G.H., Hirsch E. Reinforcing properties of spontaneous wheel running in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 77:1971;155-160
12. Premack D., Schaeffer R.W., Hundt A. Reinforcement of drinking by running: effect of fixed ratio and reinforcement time. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 7:1964;91-96
13. Sherwin C.M. Voluntary wheel running: a review and novel interpretation. Anim. Behav. 56:1998;11-27
14. Lett B.T., Grant V.L., Byrne M.J., Koh M.T. Pairings of a distinctive chamber with the aftereffect of wheel running produce conditioned place preference. Appetite. 34:2000;87-94
15. Epling W.F., Pierce W.D. Solving the anorexia puzzle: a scientific approach. 1991;Hogrefe & Huber, Toronto
16. Mackintosh N.J. The psychology of animal learning. 1974;Academic Press, London
17. Spetch M.L., Wilkie D.M., Pinel J.P.J. Backward conditioning: a reevaluation of the empirical evidence. Psychol. Bull. 89:1981;163-175
18. Cunningham C.L., Henderson C.M. Ethanol-induced conditioned place aversion in mice. Behav. Pharmacol. 11:2000;591-602
19. Cunningham C.L., Clemans J.M., Fidler T.L. Injection timing determines whether intragastric ethanol produces conditioned place preference or aversion in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 72:2002;659-668
20. Cunningham C.L., Tull L.E., Rindal K.E., Meyer P.J. Distal and proximal pre-exposure to ethanol in the place conditioning task: tolerance to aversive effect, sensitization to activating effect, but no change in rewarding effect. Psychopharmacology (Berl.). 160:2002;414-424
21. Fudala P.J., Iwamoto E.T. Conditioned aversion after delay place conditioning with nicotine. Psychopharmacology (Berl.). 92:1987;376-381
22. Fudala P.J., Iwamoto E.T. Conditioned aversion after delay place conditioning with amphetamine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 35:1990;89-92
23. Konorski J. Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. 1948;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
24. Moscovitch A., LoLordo V.M. Role of safety in the Pavlovian backward fear conditioning procedure. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 68:1968;673-678
25. Siegel S., Parker L.A., Moroz I. Morphine-induced taste avoidance is attenuated with multiple conditioning trials. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 50:1995;299-303
26. Siegel S., Domjan M. Backward conditioning as an inhibitory procedure. Learn. Motiv. 2:1971;1-11
27. Green K.F., Garcia J. Recuperation from illness: flavor enhancement for rats. Science. 173:1971;749-751
28. Hasegawa Y. Rapid communication recuperation from lithium-induced illness: flavor enhancement for rats. Behav. Neural Biol. 33:1981;252-255
29. Garcia J., Lasiter P.S., Bermudez-Rattoni F., Deems D.A. A general theory of aversion learning. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 443:1985;8-21
30. Garcia J., Koelling R.A. Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychon. Learn. 4:1966;123-124
31. Cowan D.P. Strength and persistence of conditioned taste aversion in rats: evaluation of 11 potential compounds. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 75:2002;249-260
32. Logue A.W. Taste aversion and the generality of the laws of learning. Learn Motiv. 86:1979;413-433
33. Logue A.W. Conditioned food aversion learning in humans. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 443:1985;316-329
34. Logue A.W., Logue K.R., Strauss K.E. The acquisition of taste aversions in humans with eating and drinking disorders. Behav. Res. Ther. 21:1983;275-289
35. Logue A.W., Ophir I., Strauss K.E. The acquisition of taste aversions in humans. Behav. Res. Ther. 19:1981;319-333
36. Batsell W.R.J., Best M.R. One bottle too many? Method of testing determines the detection of overshadowing. Anim. Learn. Behav. 21:1993;154-158
37. Konorski J. Integrative activity of the brain: an interdisciplinary approach. 1967;University of Chicago Press, Chicago
38. Braveman N.S., Crane J. Amount consumed and the formation of conditioned taste aversions. Behav. Biol. 21:1977;470-477
39. Revusky S., Parker L.A., Coombes J., Coombes S. Rat data which suggest alcoholic beverages should be swallowed during chemical aversion therapy, not just tasted. Behav. Res. Ther. 14:1976;189-194
40. Domjan M., Wilson N.E. The contribution of ingestive behaviors to taste-aversion learning in the rat. Anim. Learn. Behav. 3:1972;205-212
41. Ahlers R.H., Best P.J. Novelty vs. temporal contiguity in learned taste aversions. Psychon. Sci. 25:1971;36-41
42. Braveman N.S., Jarvis P.S. Independence of neophobia and taste aversion learning. Anim. Learn. Behav. 6:1978;406-412
43. Garcia J., Ervin F.R., Koelling R.A. Toxicity of serum from irradiated donors. Nature. 213:1967;682-683
44. Garcia J., Hankins W.G., Rusiniak K.W. Behavioral regulation of the milieu interne in man and rat. Science. 185:1974;824-831
45. Garcia J., Koelling R.A. A comparison of aversions induced by X-rays, toxins, and drugs in the rat. Radiat. Res. Suppl. 7:1967;439-450
46. Garcia J., McGowan B.K., Ervin F.R., Koelling R.A. Cues: their relative effectiveness as a function of the reinforcer. Science. 160:1968;794-795
47. Garcia J., Robertson Garcia R. Evolution of learning mechanisms. Hammonds B.L. Psychology and learning. The Master Lecture Series. vol. 4:1984;191-243 American Psychological Association, Washington
48. Hobden K., Pliner P. Effects of a model on food neophobia in humans. Appetite. 25:1995;101-113
49. Kalat J.W. Taste salience depends on novelty, not concentration, in taste-aversion learning in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 86:1974;47-50
50. Kalat J.W. Biological significance of food aversion learning. Milgram N.W., Krames L., Alloway T.M. Food aversion learning. 1977;73-103 Plenum, New York
51. Rozin P., Kalat J. Specific hungers and poison avoidance as adaptive specialization of learning. Psychol. Rev. 78:1971;459-486
52. Schafe G.E., Sollars S.I., Bernstein I.L. The CS-US interval and taste aversion learning: a brief look. Behav. Neurosci. 109:1995;799-802