Editorial bias in legal academia

Journal of Legal Analysis

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 309-338

  Yoon, Albert H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887580718     PISSN: 21617201     EISSN: 19465319     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jla/lat005     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ayres, Ian, & Fred Vars. 2010. Determinants of Citations to Elite Law Reviews. Journal of Legal Studies 29, 427-450
2. Bhattacharya, Mita, & Russell Smyth. 2001. The Determinants of Judicial Prestige and Influence: Some Empirical Evidence from the High Court of Australia. Journal of Legal Studies 30, 223-252
3. Blank, Rebecca. 1991. The Effects of Double-Blind v. Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from the American Economics Review. American Economic Review 81, 1041-1067
4. Bornmann, Lutz, & Hans-Dieter Daniel. 2006. What do Citation Counts Measure?: A Review of Studies on Citing Behavior. Journal of Documentation 64, 45-80
5. Caldeira, Gregory A. 1983. On the Reputation of State Supreme Courts. Political Behavior 5, 83-108
6. Choi, Stephen J., & G. Mitu Gulati. 2004. Choosing the Next Supreme Court Justice: An Empirical Ranking of Judge Performance. Southern California Law Review 78, 23-118
7. Diamond, Arthur M. 1986. What is a Citation Worth? Journal of Human Resources 21, 200-215
8. Frey, Bruno, & Katja Rost. 2010. Do Rankings Reflect Research Quality? Journal of Applied Economics 13, 1-38
9. Klein, David, & Darby Morrisroe. 1999. The Prestige and Influence of Individual Judges on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Journal of Legal Studies 28, 371-391
10. Korbkin, Russell. 1999. Ranking Journals: Some Thoughts on Theory and Methodology. Florida State Law Review 26, 851-876
11. Laband, David N. 1990. Is There Value-Added from the Review Process in Economics?: Preliminary Evidence from Authors. Quarterly Journal of Economics 105, 341-352
12. Laband, David N., & Michael J. Piette. 1994. Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors. Journal of Political Economy 102, 194-203
13. Landes, William M., Lawrence Lessig, & Michael E. Solimine. 1998. Judicial Influence: A Citation Analysis of Federal Courts of Appeals Judges. Journal of Legal Studies 27, 319-325
14. Landes, William M., & Richard A. Posner. 1993. The Influence of Economics on Law: A Quantitative Study. Journal of Law and Economics 36, 385-424
15. Leiter, Brian. 2013. Top 25 Law Faculties in Scholarly Impact, 2005-2009. http://www.leiterrankings.com/faculty/2010_scholarlyimpact.shtml
16. Li, Danielle. 2013. Information, Bias, and Efficiency in Expert Evaluation: Evidence from the NIH. Northwestern University, Kellogg School of Management, Working paper
17. Lindgren, James. 1995. Reforming the American Law Review. Stanford Law Review 47, 1123-1130
18. Lindsey, D. 1988. Using Citation Counts as Measure of Quality in Science. Scientometrics 15, 189-203
19. Medoff, Marshall H. 2003. Editorial Favoritism in Economics. Southern Economic Journal 70, 425-434
20. Nance, Jason P., & Dylan J. Steinberg. 2008. The Law Review Selection Process: Results from a National Study. Albany Law Review 71, 565-621
21. Phillips, Y., C. James, & Y. John. 2012. The Cite Stuff: Inventing a Better Law Faculty Relevance Measure. Berkeley: University of California, Working Paper
22. Posner, Richard A. 1990. Cardozo: A Study in Reputation. University of Chicago Press
23. Posner, Richard A. 1995. The Future of the Student-Edited Law Review. Stanford Law Review 47, 1131-1138
24. Posner, Richard A. 2000. An Economic Analysis of the Use of Citations in the Law. American Law and Economics Review 2, 381-406
25. Quandt, Richard. 1976. Some Quantitative Aspects of the Economics Journal Literature. Journal of Political Economy 84, 741-756
26. Sisk, Gregory, Valerie Aggerbeck, Debby Hackerson, & Mary Wells. 2012. Scholarly Impact of Law Faculties in 2012: Applying Leiter Scores to Rank the Top Third. University of St. Thomas Law Journal 9, 838-868
27. Smyth, Russell, & Mita Bhattacharya. 2003. What Determines Judicial Prestige? An Empirical Analysis for Judges of the Federal Court of Australia. American Law and Economics Review 5, 233-262
28. Stigler, George J., & Claire Friedland. 1975. The Citation Practices of Doctorates in Economics. Journal of Political Economy 83, 477-507
29. Subotnik, Dan, & Glen Lazar. 1999. Deconstructing the Rejection Letter: A Look at Elitism in Article Selection. Journal of Legal Education 49, 601-613
30. van Noorden, Richard. 2012. Researchers Feel Pressure to Cite Superfluous Papers. Nature, February 7, 2012
31. Watson, Alan. 2006. The Shame of American Legal Education. Vanderplas Publishing1