Applying genetic algorithm based optimizer to software quality classification

2006 Proceedings - 12th ISSAT International Conference on Reliability and Quality in Design

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 139-143

  Khoshgoftaar, Taghi M ^a   Xiao, Yudong ^a   Gao, Kehan ^b  

^a Florida Atlantic University   (United States)

^b EASTERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Case based reasoning; Genetic algorithm; Mahalanobis distance; Objective function; Software quality classification

Indexed keywords

CASE BASED REASONING SYSTEMS; MAHALANOBIS DISTANCES; MATHEMATICAL METHOD; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; SOFTWARE PRODUCTS; SOFTWARE QUALITY; SOFTWARE QUALITY MODELING;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; OPTIMIZATION;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84887530146     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Colin J. Burgess and Martin Lefley. Can genetic programming improve software effort estimation? a comparative evaluation. Information and Software Technology, 43(14): 863-873, 2001.
2. G. R. Finnie, G. E. Wittig, and J. M. Desharnais. A comparison of software affort estimation thchniques using function points with neural networks, case based reasoning and regression model. Journal of systems software, 39: 281-289, 1997.
3. D. E. Goldgerg. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1989.
4. Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar, Edward B. Allen, and Jianyu Deng. Using regression trees to classify fault-prone software modules. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 51(4): 455-462, December 2002.
5. Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar, Bojan Cukic, and Naeem Seliya. Predicting fault-prone modules in embedded systems using analogy-based classification models. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 12(2): 201-221, April 2002. World Scientific Publishing.
6. Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar and David L. Lanning. A neural network approach for early detection of program modules having high risk in the maintenance phase. Journal of Systems and Software, 29(1): 85-91, April 1995.
7. G. Klien. Sources of Power: how poeple make dicisions. MIT press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
8. Yi Liu and Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar. Genetic programming model for software quality prediction. In Proceedings: 6th International High Assurance Systems Engineering Symposium, pages 127-136, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, October 2001. IEEE Computer Society.
9. C. Mair, G. Kadoda, M. Lefley, K. Phalp, C. Schofield, M. Shepperd, and S. Webster. A investigation of machine learning based prediction system. Journal of system software, 53(1): 23-29, 2000.
10. N. Ohlsson, M. Zhao, and M. Helander. Application of multivariate analysis for software fault prediction. Software Quality Journal, 7(1): 51-66, 1998.
11. A. A. Porter and R. W. Selby. Empirically guided software development using metric-based classification trees. IEEE Software, 7(2): 46-54, Mar. 1990.
12. C. V. Ramamoorthy, C. Chandra, S. Ishihara, and Y. Ng. Knowledge-based tools for risk assessment in software development and reuse. In Proceedings: 5th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pages 364-371, Boston, MA, USA, November 1993. IEEE Computer Society.
13. M. Shepperd and C. Schofield. Estimating software project effort using analogies. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 23(12): 736-743, November 1997.
14. Kevin S. Van Horn and R. Martinez. The BBG rule induction algorithm. In Proceedings of the 6th Australian Joint Conference on AI, pages 348-355, Nov 1993.
15. S. Wang and D. Kountanis. IASCE: An intelligent assistant to software cost estimation. In Proceedings: 5th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pages 114-176, Arlington, VA USA, 1992. IEEE Computer Society.