Ridge alterations post-extraction in the esthetic zone: A 3D analysis with CBCT

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 92, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Chappuis, V ^a   Engel, O ^a   Reyes, M ^a   Shahim, K ^a   Nolte, L P ^a   Buser, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

bone remodeling; bone resorption; clinical trial; dental implants; maxilla; three dimensional imaging

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; BONE REMODELING; CANINE TOOTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCISOR; JAW; MALE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOLYSIS; PHENOTYPE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH SOCKET; YOUNG ADULT;

BONE REMODELING; BONE RESORPTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL IMPLANTS; MAXILLA; THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; BONE RESORPTION; COLLAGEN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CUSPID; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INCISOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHENOTYPE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH SOCKET; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887502505     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: 15440591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022034513506713     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 ; 32: 212-218
2. Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 ; 32: 645-652
3. Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009 ; 80: 140-151
4. Braut V, Bornstein MM, Belser U, Buser D. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall - a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 ; 31: 125-131
5. Buser D 20 years of guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Inc. ; 2009: 123-152.
6. Buser D, von Arx T, ten Bruggenkate C, Weingart D. Basic surgical principles with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 ; 11: 59-68
7. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 ; 19: 43-61
8. Buser D, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Grutter L, Schmid B, Belser UC. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 subjects with a 2- to 4-year follow-up. J Periodontol. 2008 ; 79: 1773-1781
9. Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 ; 30: 809-818
10. Chen S, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla - a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 ;:
11. Chen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 ; 24: 186-217
12. European Commission (2011). Protection Radiation No. 172. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence-based guidelines. In: RP Unit editor, pp. 73-76. URL accessed on 9/5/2013 at: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/ nuclear/radiation-protection/doc/publication/172.pdf.
13. Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Huerzeler M. Tissue alterations after tooth extraction with and without surgical trauma: a volumetric study in the beagle dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 ; 35: 356-363
14. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005 ; 25: 113-119
15. Hämmerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 ; 19: 26-28
16. Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MA. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 ; 37: 268-273
17. Huynh-Ba G, Pjetursson BE, Sanz M, Cecchinato D, Ferrus J, Lindhe J, et al. Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 ; 21: 37-42
18. Januario AL, Duarte WR, Barriviera M, Mesti JC, Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 ; 22: 1168-1171
19. Kim H, Jurgens P, Weber S, Nolte LP, Reyes M. A new soft-tissue simulation strategy for cranio-maxillofacial surgery using facial muscle template model. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2010 ; 103: 284-291
20. Lorenson W, Cline H. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3d surface construction algorithm. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques ; 1987 ; 1987. 163.
21. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol. 2009 ; 71: 461-468
22. Morton D, Chen ST, Martin WC, Levine R, Buser D. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding optimizing esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 ;:
23. Oja H New York, NY: Springer ; 2010:
24. Qahash M, Susin C, Polimeni G, Hall J, Wikesjö UM. Bone healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 ; 19: 166-172
25. Roe P, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Zimmerman G, Mesquida J. Horizontal and vertical dimensional changes of peri-implant facial bone following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 1-year cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 ; 27: 393-400
26. Sanz M, Cecchinato D, Ferrus J, Pjetursson EB, Lang NP, Lindhe J. A prospective, randomized-controlled clinical trial to evaluate bone preservation using implants with different geometry placed into extraction sockets in the maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 ; 21: 13-21
27. Schenk RK, Buser D, Hardwick WR, Dahlin C. Healing pattern of bone regeneration in membrane-protected defects: a histologic study in the canine mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994 ; 9: 13-29
28. Ten Heggeler JM, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA. Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 ; 22: 779-788
29. Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 ; 113: 817-826
30. Vera C, De Kok IJ, Chen W, Reside G, Tyndall D, Cooper LF. Evaluation of post-implant buccal bone resorption using cone beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012a ; 27: 1249-1257
31. Vera C, De Kok IJ, Reinhold D, Limpiphipatanakorn P, Yap AK, Tyndall D, et al. Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012b ; 27: 1514-1519