Size does matter: How image size affects aesthetic perception?

MM 2013 - Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Multimedia Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 53-62

  Chu, Wei Ta ^a   Chen, Yu Kuang ^a   Chen, Kuan Ta ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Crowdsourcing; Human perception; Image aesthetics; Quality assessment; Size dependent aesthetics

Indexed keywords

CROWDSOURCING; HUMAN PERCEPTION; IMAGE AESTHETICS; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; SIZE DEPENDENT;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 84887485087     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2502081.2502102     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. A. Bosch, A. Zisserman, and X. Munoz. Representing shape with a spatial pyramid kernel. In Proceedings of CIVR, pages 401-408, 2007.
2. K.-T. Chen, C.-C. Wu, Y.-C. Chang, and C.-L. Lei. A crowdsourceable QoE evaluation framework for multimedia content. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 2009, 2009.
3. R. Datta, D. Joshi, J. Li, and J. Wang. Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach. In Proceedings of ECCV, pages 288-301, 2006.
4. R. Datta and J. Wang. ACQUINE: Aesthetic quality inference engine - real-time automatic rating of photo aesthetics. In Proceedings of MIR, pages 421-424, 2010.
5. S. de Jong. SIMPLS: An alternative approach to partial least squares regression. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 18:251-263, 1993.
6. S. Dhar, V. Ordonez, and T. Berg. High level describable attributes for predicting aesthetics and interestingness. In Proceedings of CVPR, pages 1657-1664, 2011.
7. Y. Ke, X. Tang, and F. Jing. The design of high-level features for photo quality assessment. In Proceedings of CVPR, pages 419-426, 2006.
8. C. Li and T. Chen. Aesthetic visual quality assessment of paintings. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 3(2):236-252, 2009.
9. L. Liu, R. Chen, and D. Cohen-Or. Optimizing photo composition. Eurographics, 29(2):469-478, 2010.
10. W. Luo, X. Wang, and X. Tang. Content-based photo quality assessment. In Proceedings of ICCV, pages 2206-2213, 2011.
11. B. Manjunath and M.-Y. Ma. Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image data. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(8):837-842, 1996.
12. X. Sun, H. Yao, R. Ji, and S. Liu. Photo assessment based on computational visual attention model. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia, pages 541-544, 2009.
13. H. Tong, M. Li, H. Zhang, J. He, and C. Zhang. Classification of digital photos taken by photographers or home users. In Proceedings of PCM, 2004.
14. L.-K. Wong and K.-L. Low. Saliency-enhanced image aesthetics class prediction. In Proceedings of ICIP, pages 997-1000, 2009.
15. O. Wu, W. Hu, and J. Gao. Learning to predict the perceived visual quality of photos. In Proceedings of ICCV, pages 225-232, 2011.