Larger Daphnia at lower temperature: A role for cell size and genome configuration?1

Genome

Volumn 56, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 511-519

  Jalal, Marwa ^a   Wojewodzic, Marcin W ^a   Laane, Carl Morten M ^a   Hessen, Dag O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Daphnia; DNA condensation; Flow cytometry; Genome size; Temperature

Indexed keywords

DNA; FLUORESCENT DYE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SIZE; COLD; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DAPHNIA; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOME SIZE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SIZE; COLD TEMPERATURE; DAPHNIA; DNA; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENT DYES; GENOME; GENOME SIZE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84887444395     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/gen-2013-0004     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adamowicz S.J. Gregory T.R. Marinone M.C. Hebert P.D.N. 2002. New insights into the distribution of polyploid Daphnia: the Holarctic revisited and Argentina explored. Mol. Ecol. 11 (7): 1209-1217. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002. 01517.x. 12074728.
2. Angilletta M.J. Steury T.D. Sears M.W. 2004. Temperature, growth rate, and body size in ectotherms: fitting pieces of a life-history puzzle. Integr. Comp. Biol. 44 (6): 498-509. 10.1093/icb/44.6.498. 21676736.
3. Arendt J. 2007. Ecological correlates of body size in relation to cell size and cell number: patterns in flies, fish, fruits and foliage. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 82 (2): 241-256. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00013.x. 17437559.
4. Atkinson D. 1994. Temperature and organism size,a biological law for ectotherms? Adv. Ecol Res. 25: 1-58. 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60212-3.
5. Atkinson D. Morley S.A. Hughes R.N. 2006. From cells to colonies: at what levels of body organization does the 'temperature size rule' apply? Evol. Dev. 8 (2): 202-214. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.00090.x. 16509898.
6. Azevedo R. French V. Partridge L. 2002. Temperature modulates epidermal cell size in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 48 (2): 231-237. 10.1016/S0022-1910(01)00168-8. 12770123.
7. Baird D.J. Barber I. Bradley M. Soares A.M.V.M. Calow P. 1991. A comparative study of genotype sensitivity to acute toxic stress using clones of Daphnia magna straus. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 21 (3): 257-265. 10.1016/0147-6513(91)90064-V. 1868782.
8. Baretton G. Blasenbreu S. Li X. DePascale T. Löhrs U. 1994. DNA cytometry using paraffin embedded tumor tissues. Comparison of flow cytometry (FCM) and image cytometry (ICM). Z. Pathol. 139 (6): 419. 7512820.
9. Beaton M.J. Hebert P.D.N. 1989. Miniature genomes and endopolyploidy in cladoceran crustaceans. Genome, 32 (6): 1048-1053. 10.1139/g89-552.
10. Bennett M.D. 1987. Variation in genomic form in plants and its ecological implications. New Phytol. 106: 177-200. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb04689.x.
11. Bergmann, C. 1848. Über die Verhältnisse der Wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Göttinger Studien.
12. Blanckenhorn W. Llaurens V. 2005. Effects of temperature on cell size and number in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria. J. Therm. Biol. 30 (3): 213-219. 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2004.11.004.
13. Cavalier-Smith T. 1982. Skeletal DNA and the evolution of genome size. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 11 (1): 273-302. 10.1146/annurev.bb.11.060182. 001421. 7049065.
14. Cavalier-Smith T. 2005. Economy, speed and size matter: evolutionary forces driving nuclear genome miniaturization and expansion. Ann. Bot. 95 (1): 147-175. 10.1093/aob/mci010. 15596464.
15. Colbourne J.K. Pfrender M.E. Gilbert D. Thomas W.K. Tucker A. Oakley T.H. et al 2011. The ecoresponsive genome of Daphnia pulex. Science, 331 (6017): 555-561. 10.1126/science.1197761. 21292972.
16. Darzynkiewicz, Z. 2010. Critical aspects in analysis of cellular DNA content. Curr. Protoc. Cytom. 7.2. 1-7.2. 8. 10.1002/0471142956.cy0702s52.
17. Dressler L.G. 1990. Controls, standards, and histogram interpretation in DNA flow cytometry. Methods Cell Biol. 33: 157-171. 10.1016/S0091-679X(08)60522- 1. 2084467.
18. Ebert D. 1992. A food-independent maturation threshold and size at maturity in Daphnia magna. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37: 878-881. 10.4319/lo.1992.37.4. 0878.
19. Escribano R. McLaren I.A. Klein Breteler W.C.M. 1992. Innate and acquired variation of nuclear DNA contents of marine copepods. Genome, 35 (4): 602-610. 10.1139/g92-090.
20. Fabian D.K. Kapun M. Nolte V. Kofler R. Schmidt P.S. Schlötterer C. Flatt T. 2012. Genome-wide patterns of latitudinal differentiation among populations of Drosophila melanogaster from North America. Mol. Ecol. 21 (19): 4748-4769. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05731.x. 22913798.
21. Galbraith D.W. Harkins K.R. Maddox J.M. Ayres N.M. Sharma D.P. Firoozabady E. 1983. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science, 220 (4601): 1049-1051. 10.1126/science.220.4601.1049. 17754551.
22. Galbraith, D.W., Lambert, G.M., Macas, J., and Dolezel, J. 2001. Analysis of nuclear DNA content and ploidy in higher plants. In Current protocols in cytometry. Edited by J. Robinson, Z. Darzynkiewicz, P. Dean, A. Hibbs, A. Orfão, P. Rabinovitch, and L. Wheeless. Wiley, N.Y. pp. 7.6.1-7.6.22. 10.1002/0471142956.cy0706s02.
23. Galbraith M.G. Jr 1967. Size-selective predation on Daphnia by rainbow trout and yellow perch. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 96 (1): 1-10. 10.1577/1548- 8659(1967)96[1:SPODBR]2.0.CO;2.
24. Givan, A.L. 2001. Flow cytometry: first principles. Wiley-Liss, N.Y.
25. Gregory T.R. 2001. Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value enigma. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 76 (1): 65-101. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2000.tb00059.x.
26. Gregory, T.R. 2013. Animal genome size database. [Online.] Available from http://www.genomesize.com (accessed 3 January 2013).
27. Gregory T.R. Hebert P.D.N. Kolasa J. 2000. Evolutionary implications of the relationship between genome size and body size in flatworms and copepods. Heredity, 84 (2): 201-208. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00661.x. 10762390.
28. Hessen D.O. Persson J. 2009. Genome size as a determinant of growth and life-history traits in crustaceans. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 98 (2): 393-399. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01285.x.
29. Hessen D.O. Daufresne M. Leinaas H.P. 2013. Temperature size relations from the cellular genomic perspective. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 88 (2): 476-489. 10.1111/brv.12006. 23551915.
30. Kilham S.S. Kreeger D.A. Lynn S.G. Goulden C.E. Herrera L. 1998. COMBO: a defined freshwater culture medium for algae and zooplankton. Hydrobiologia, 377 (1-3): 147-159. 10.1023/A:1003231628456.
31. Kondorosi E. Roudier F. Gendreau E. 2000. Plant cell-size control: growing by ploidy? Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3 (6): 488-492. 10.1016/S1369- 5266(00)00118-7. 11074380.
32. Korpelainen H. Ketola M. Hietala J. 1997. Somatic polyploidy examined by flow cytometry in Daphnia. J. Plankton Res. 19 (12): 2031-2040. 10.1093/plankt/19.12.2031.
33. Kozłowski J. Konarzewski M. Gawelczyk A. 2003. Cell size as a link between noncoding DNA and metabolic rate scaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (24): 14080-140805. 10.1073/pnas.2334605100. 14615584.
34. Lui R. Blanco D. Moreira-Filho O. Margarido V. 2012. Propidium iodide for making heterochromatin more evident in the C-banding technique. Biotech. Histochem. 87 (7): 433-438. 10.3109/10520295.2012.696700. 22747174.
35. Marie D. Brown S.C. 1993. A cytometric exercise in plant DNA histograms, with 2C values for 70 species. Biology of the Cell, 78 (1-2): 41-51. 10.1016/0248-4900(93)90113-S. 8220226.
36. Mc Kee D. Ebert D. 1996. The effect of temperature on maturation threshold body-length in Daphnia magna. Oecologia, 108 (4): 627-630. 10.1007/BF00329035.
37. McLaren I. Sevigny J. Corkett C. 1988. Body sizes, development rates, and genome sizes among Calanus species. Hydrobiologia, 167 (1): 275-284. 10.1007/BF00026315.
38. Mitchell S. Lampert W. 2000. Temperature adaptation in a geographically widespread zooplankter, Daphnia magna. J. Evol. Biol. 13 (3): 371-382. 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00193.x.
39. Noirot M. Barre P. Duperray C. Hamon S. De Kochko A. 2005. Investigation on the causes of stoichiometric error in genome size estimation using heat experiments: consequences on data interpretation. Ann. Bot. 95 (1): 111-118. 10.1093/aob/mci006. 15596460.
40. Pangle K.L. Peacor S.D. 2010. Temperature gradients, not food resource gradients, affect growth rate of migrating Daphnia mendotae in Lake Michigan. J. Gt. Lakes Res. 36 (2): 345-350. 10.1016/j.jglr.2010.01.005.
41. 2-induced apoptosis of PC-12 cells. Phytomedicine, 18 (10): 843-847. 10.1016/j.phymed.2011.01.025. 21377855.
42. Partridge, L., and French, V. 1996. Thermal evolution of ectotherm body size: why get big in the cold? In Animals and temperature: phenotypic and evolutionary adaptation. Edited by I.A. Johnston and A.F. Bennett. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. pp. 265-292.
43. Partridge, L., Barrie, B., Fowler, K., and French, V. 1994. Evolution and development of body size and cell size in Drosophila melanogaster in response to temperature. Evolution, 48 (4) 1269-1276. Available from http://www.jstor. org/stable/2410384 (accessed 10 May 2013).
44. Pulkkinen K. 2007. Microparasite transmission to Daphnia magna decreases in the presence of conspecifics. Oecologia, 154 (1): 45-53. 10.1007/s00442-007- 0805-0. 17657511.
45. Rees D.J. Dufresne F. Glémet H. Belzile C. 2007. Amphipod genome sizes: first estimates for Arctic species reveal genomic giants. Genome, 50 (2): 151-158. 10.1139/G06-155. 17546080.
46. Robins J.H. McLaren I.A. 1982. Unusual variations in nuclear DNA contents in the marine copepod Pseudocalanus. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 24 (5): 529-540. 10.1139/g82-056. 7168827.
47. Seebacher F. 2009. Responses to temperature variation: integration of thermoregulation and metabolism in vertebrates. Sci. Signal. 212 (18): 2885.
48. Shapiro, H.M. 2003. Practical flow cytometry. Wiley-Liss, N.Y.
49. Stokke T. Steen H.B. 1987. Distinction of leucocyte classes based on chromatin-structure-dependent DNA-binding of 7-aminoactinomycin D. Cytometry, 8 (6): 576-583. 10.1002/cyto.990080608. 2448092.
50. Tabachnick, B.G., and Fidell, L.S. 1996. Using multivariate statistics. Harper Collins.
51. Van Voorhies W.A. 1996. Bergmann size clines: a simple explanation for their occurrence in ectotherms. Evolution, 50 (3): 1259-1264. 10.2307/2410666.
52. Vergilino R. Belzile C. Dufresne F. 2009. Genome size evolution and polyploidy in the Daphnia pulex complex (Cladocera: Daphniidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 97 (1): 68-79. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01185.x.
53. Versaevel M. Grevesse T. Gabriele S. 2012. Spatial coordination between cell and nuclear shape within micropatterned endothelial cells. Nat. Commun. 3: 671. 10.1038/ncomms1668. 22334074.
54. Vilhar B. Greilhuber J. Koce J.D. Temsch E.M. Dermastia M. 2001. Plant genome size measurement with DNA image cytometry. Ann. Bot. 87 (6): 719-728. 10.1006/anbo.2001.1394.
55. Vinogradov A.E. 2005. Genome size and chromatin condensation in vertebrates. Chromosoma, 113 (7): 362-369. 15647899.
56. Weider L.J. Glenn K.L. Kyle M. Elser J.J. 2004. Associations among ribosomal (r)DNA intergenic spacer length, growth rate, and C:N:P stoichiometry in the genus Daphnia. Limnol Oceanogr. 49 (4): 1417-1423. 10.4319/lo.2004.49.4- part-2.1417.
57. Wojewodzic M.W. Kyle M. Elser J.J. Hessen D.O. Andersen T. 2011. Joint effect of phosphorus limitation and temperature on alkaline phosphatase activity and somatic growth in Daphnia magna. Oecologia, 165 (4): 837-846. 10.1007/s00442-010-1863-2. 21153741.