ACMG Standards and Guidelines for constitutional cytogenomic microarray analysis, including postnatal and prenatal applications: Revision 2013

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 901-909

  South, Sarah T ^a,b   Lee, Charles ^c   Lamb, Allen N ^a,b   Higgins, Anne W ^d   Kearney, Hutton M ^e  

^a ARUP LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e Mission Health   (United States)

Author keywords

constitutional; guidelines; microarray; postnatal; prenatal; standards

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; ACMG STANDARD AND GUIDELINE; ARTICLE; AUTISM; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; CLINICAL LABORATORY; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; CYTOGENETICS; DNA METHYLATION; DNA SEQUENCE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOSITY LOSS; HUMAN; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MOSAICISM; POINT MUTATION; POSTNATAL CARE; POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRENATAL CARE; QUALITY CONTROL; SEGMENTAL DUPLICATION; SEX CHROMOSOME; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TETRAPLOIDY;

ABNORMALITIES, MULTIPLE; AUTISTIC DISORDER; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; GENETIC TESTING; GENETICS, MEDICAL; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 84887416438     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: 15300366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.129     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Manning M, Hudgins L; Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee. Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genet Med 2010;12:742-745.
2. Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 2010;86:749-764.
3. Kearney HM, South ST, Wolff DJ, Lamb A, Hamosh A, Rao KW; Working Group of the American College of Medical Genetics. American College of Medical Genetics recommendations for the design and performance expectations for clinical genomic copy number microarrays intended for use in the postnatal setting for detection of constitutional abnormalities. Genet Med 2011;13:676-679.
4. Lee C, Iafrate AJ, Brothman AR. Copy number variations and clinical cytogenetic diagnosis of constitutional disorders. Nat Genet 2007;39(suppl 7):S48-S54.
5. Firth HV, Richards SM, Bevan AP, et al. DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources. Am J Hum Genet 2009;84:524-533.
6. Riggs ER, Church DM, Hanson K, et al. Towards an evidence-based process for the clinical interpretation of copy number variation. Clin Genet 2012;81:403-412.
7. Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40(Database issue):D13-D25.
8. Zhang J, Feuk L, Duggan GE, Khaja R, Scherer SW. Development of bioinformatics resources for display and analysis of copy number and other structural variants in the human genome. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006;115:205-214.
9. van Heesch S, Mokry M, Boskova V, et al. Systematic biases in DNA copy number originate from isolation procedures. Genome Biol 2013;14(4):R33.
10. Mason-Suares H, Kim W, Grimmett L, et al. Density matters: comparison of array platforms for detection of copy-number variation and copy-neutral abnormalities. Genet Med 2013;15:706-712.
11. Cytogenetics TAfC. Professional Guidelines for Clinical Cytogenetics and Clinical Molecular Genetics: QF-PCR for the Diagnosis of Aneuploidy, Best Practice Guidelines. In: Genetics BSfH (ed), v3.01. Clinical Genetics Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital: Birmingham, England, B 15 2TG: ACC Heads of Department; 2012:1-16.
12. Pinto D, Darvishi K, Shi X, et al. Comprehensive assessment of array-based platforms and calling algorithms for detection of copy number variants. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29:512-520.
13. Kearney HM, Thorland EC, Brown KK, Quintero-Rivera F, South ST; Working Group of the American College of Medical Genetics Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. Genet Med 2011;13:680-685.
14. Rehder CW, David KL, Hirsch B, Toriello HV, Wilson CM, Kearney HM. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics: standards and guidelines for documenting suspected consanguinity as an incidental finding of genomic testing. Genet Med 2013;15:150-152.