Segment-tree based cost aggregation for stereo matching

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 313-320

  Mei, Xing ^a   Sun, Xun ^b   Dong, Weiming ^a   Wang, Haitao ^b   Zhang, Xiaopeng ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF AUTOMATION   (China)

^b Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION METHODS; COST AGGREGATIONS; DENSE STEREO MATCHING; GRAPH CONNECTIVITY; MINIMUM SPANNING TREES; SCENE SEGMENTATION; THREE-STEP PROCESS; TREE CONSTRUCTION;

COSTS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PIXELS;

TREES (MATHEMATICS);

EID: 84887382311     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2013.47     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. D. Comaniciu and P. Meer. Mean shift: a robust approach toward feature space analysis. PAMI, 24(5):603-619, 2002.
2. T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, R. L. Rivest, and C. Stein. Introduction to algorithms, 3rd Edition. MIT Press, 2009.
3. L. De-Maeztu, S. Mattoccia, A. Villanueva, and R. Cabeza. Linear stereo matching. In ICCV, pages 1708-1715, 2011.
4. P. F. Felzenszwalb and D. P. Huttenlocher. Efficient graphbased image segmentation. IJCV, 59(2):167-181, 2004.
5. A. Geiger, P. Lenz, and R. Urtasun. Are we ready for autonomous driving? the kitti vision benchmark suite. In CVPR, pages 3354-3361, 2012.
6. K. He, J. Sun, and X. Tang. Guided image filtering. In ECCV, pages 1-14, 2010.
7. A. Hosni, M. Bleyer, M. Gelautz, and C. Rhemann. Local stereo matching using geodesic support weights. In ICIP, pages 2093-2096, 2009.
8. A. Klaus, M. Sormann, and K. Karner. Segment-based stereo matching using belief propagation and a self-adapting dissimilarity measure. In ICPR, pages 15-18, 2006.
9. V. Kolmogorov, A. Criminisi, A. Blake, G. Cross, and C. Rother. Bi-layer segmentation of binocular stereo video. In CVPR, pages 407-414, 2005.
10. C. Lei, J. M. Selzer, and Y.-H. Yang. Region-tree based stereo using dynamic programming optimization. In CVPR, pages 2378-2385, 2006.
11. X. Mei, X. Sun, M. Zhou, S. Jiao, H. Wang, and X. Zhang. On building an accurate stereo matching system on graphics hardware. In ICCV Workshops, pages 467-474, 2011.
12. C. D. Mutto, P. Zanuttigh, and G. M. Cortelazzo. Fusion of geometry and color information for scene segmentation. IJSTSP, 6(5):505-521, 2012.
13. X. Ren. Local grouping for optical flow. In CVPR, pages 1-8, 2008.
14. C. Rhemann, A. Hosni, M. Bleyer, C. Rother, and M. Gelautz. Fast cost-volume filtering for visual correspondence and beyond. In CVPR, pages 3017-3024, 2011.
15. D. Scharstein and R. Szeliski. A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms. IJCV, 47(1-3):7-42, 2002.
16. D. Scharstein and R. Szeliski. Middlebury stereo evaluation, 2012. http://vision. middlebury. edu/stereo/eval/.
17. J. Shi and J. Malik. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. PAMI, 22(8):888-905, 2000.
18. B. M. Smith, L. Zhang, and H. Jin. Stereo matching with nonparametric smoothness priors in feature space. In CVPR, pages 485-492, 2009.
19. F. Tombari, S. Mattoccia, L. Stefano, and E. Addimanda. Classification and evaluation of cost aggregation methods for stereo correspondence. In CVPR, pages 1-8, 2008.
20. F. Tombari, S. Mattoccia, and L. D. Stefano. Segmentationbased adaptive support for accurate stereo correspondence. In PSIVT, pages 427-438, 2007.
21. O. Veksler. Stereo correspondence by dynamic programming on a tree. In CVPR, pages 384-390, 2005.
22. Z. Wang and Z. Zheng. A region based stereo matching algorithm using cooperative optimization. In CVPR, pages 1-8, 2008.
23. Q. Yang. A non-local cost aggregation method for stereo matching. In CVPR, pages 1402-1409, 2012.
24. Q. Yang, L. Wang, R. Yang, H. Stewénius, and D. Nistér. Stereo matching with color-weighted correlation, hierarchical belief propagation and occlusion handling. PAMI, 31(3):492-504, 2009.
25. K. J. Yoon and I. S. Kweon. Adaptive support-weight approach for correspondence search. PAMI, 28(4):650-656, 2006.