메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 96, Issue , 2013, Pages 132-140

Justifying precautionary policies: Incommensurability and uncertainty

Author keywords

Decision theory; Incommensurability; Keynesian uncertainty; Precautionary principle; Rawls

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; DAMAGE; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PHILOSOPHY; POLICY MAKING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84887365458     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.006     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (26)

References (80)
  • 2
    • 33745325041 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Incommensurability and monetary valuation
    • Aldred J. Incommensurability and monetary valuation. Land Econ. 2006, 82:141-161.
    • (2006) Land Econ. , vol.82 , pp. 141-161
    • Aldred, J.1
  • 3
    • 70649096953 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ethics and climate change cost-benefit analysis
    • Aldred J. Ethics and climate change cost-benefit analysis. New Polit. Econ. 2009, 14:469-488.
    • (2009) New Polit. Econ. , vol.14 , pp. 469-488
    • Aldred, J.1
  • 4
    • 84866445368 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Climate change uncertainty, irreversibility and the precautionary principle
    • Aldred J. Climate change uncertainty, irreversibility and the precautionary principle. Camb. J. Econ. 2012, 36:1051-1072.
    • (2012) Camb. J. Econ. , vol.36 , pp. 1051-1072
    • Aldred, J.1
  • 5
    • 77949592371 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The ambiguity aversion literature: a critical assessment
    • Al-Najjar N.I., Weinstein J. The ambiguity aversion literature: a critical assessment. Econ. Philos. 2009, 25:249-284.
    • (2009) Econ. Philos. , vol.25 , pp. 249-284
    • Al-Najjar, N.I.1    Weinstein, J.2
  • 8
    • 66549114715 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Objective or multi-objective? Two historically competing visions for benefit-cost analysis
    • Banzhaf H.S. Objective or multi-objective? Two historically competing visions for benefit-cost analysis. Land Econ. 2009, 85:3-23.
    • (2009) Land Econ. , vol.85 , pp. 3-23
    • Banzhaf, H.S.1
  • 9
    • 48749086523 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The economics of avoiding dangerous climate change
    • Barker T. The economics of avoiding dangerous climate change. Clim. Chang. 2008, 89:173-194.
    • (2008) Clim. Chang. , vol.89 , pp. 173-194
    • Barker, T.1
  • 10
    • 84866443470 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Shackle and modern decision theory
    • Basili M., Zappia C. Shackle and modern decision theory. Metroeconomica 2009, 60:245-282.
    • (2009) Metroeconomica , vol.60 , pp. 245-282
    • Basili, M.1    Zappia, C.2
  • 11
    • 77952217412 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ambiguity and uncertainty in Ellsberg and Shackle
    • Basili M., Zappia C. Ambiguity and uncertainty in Ellsberg and Shackle. Camb. J. Econ. 2010, 34:449-474.
    • (2010) Camb. J. Econ. , vol.34 , pp. 449-474
    • Basili, M.1    Zappia, C.2
  • 12
    • 50849084436 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Precautionary principle as a rule of choice with optimism on windfall gains and pessimism on catastrophic losses
    • Basili M., Chateauneuf A., Fontini F. Precautionary principle as a rule of choice with optimism on windfall gains and pessimism on catastrophic losses. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 67:485-491.
    • (2008) Ecol. Econ. , vol.67 , pp. 485-491
    • Basili, M.1    Chateauneuf, A.2    Fontini, F.3
  • 13
    • 35348986834 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ethics of the discount rate in the Stern Review on the economics of climate change
    • Beckerman W., Hepburn C. Ethics of the discount rate in the Stern Review on the economics of climate change. World Econ. 2007, 8:187-210.
    • (2007) World Econ. , vol.8 , pp. 187-210
    • Beckerman, W.1    Hepburn, C.2
  • 14
    • 0001904687 scopus 로고
    • Endangered species and uncertainty: the economics of a safe minimum standard
    • Bishop R. Endangered species and uncertainty: the economics of a safe minimum standard. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1978, 60:10-18.
    • (1978) Am. J. Agric. Econ. , vol.60 , pp. 10-18
    • Bishop, R.1
  • 15
    • 0002595086 scopus 로고
    • The ideology of efficiency: searching for a theory of policy analysis
    • Bromley D. The ideology of efficiency: searching for a theory of policy analysis. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1990, 19:86-107.
    • (1990) J. Environ. Econ. Manag. , vol.19 , pp. 86-107
    • Bromley, D.1
  • 18
    • 55949118682 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Discounting climate change
    • Dasgupta P. Discounting climate change. J. Risk Uncertain. 2008, 37:141-169.
    • (2008) J. Risk Uncertain. , vol.37 , pp. 141-169
    • Dasgupta, P.1
  • 19
    • 80052449874 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Uncertainty: a typology and refinements of existing concepts
    • Dequech D. Uncertainty: a typology and refinements of existing concepts. J. Econ. Isues 2011, 45:621-640.
    • (2011) J. Econ. Isues , vol.45 , pp. 621-640
    • Dequech, D.1
  • 21
    • 67650914652 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • New frontiers in the economics of climate change
    • Dietz S., Maddison D. New frontiers in the economics of climate change. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2009, 43:295-306.
    • (2009) Environ. Resour. Econ. , vol.43 , pp. 295-306
    • Dietz, S.1    Maddison, D.2
  • 24
    • 0032464491 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The rationality of a safe minimum standard
    • Farmer M.C., Randall A. The rationality of a safe minimum standard. Land Econ. 1998, 74:287-302.
    • (1998) Land Econ. , vol.74 , pp. 287-302
    • Farmer, M.C.1    Randall, A.2
  • 25
    • 77957349754 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On Keynes's conception of the weight of evidence
    • Feduzi A. On Keynes's conception of the weight of evidence. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2010, 76:338-351.
    • (2010) J. Econ. Behav. Organ. , vol.76 , pp. 338-351
    • Feduzi, A.1
  • 26
    • 33645149718 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A core precautionary principle
    • Gardiner S.M. A core precautionary principle. J. Polit. Pilos. 2006, 14:33-60.
    • (2006) J. Polit. Pilos. , vol.14 , pp. 33-60
    • Gardiner, S.M.1
  • 28
    • 0001266334 scopus 로고
    • Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior
    • Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior. J. Math. Econ. 1989, 18:141-153.
    • (1989) J. Math. Econ. , vol.18 , pp. 141-153
    • Gilboa, I.1    Schmeidler, D.2
  • 30
    • 77249163936 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is it always rational to satisfy Savage's axioms?
    • Gilboa I., Postlewaite A., Schmeidler D. Is it always rational to satisfy Savage's axioms?. Econ. Philos. 2009, 25:285-296.
    • (2009) Econ. Philos. , vol.25 , pp. 285-296
    • Gilboa, I.1    Postlewaite, A.2    Schmeidler, D.3
  • 31
    • 0041412755 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Decision-making under scientific uncertainty: the economics of the precautionary principle
    • Gollier C., Treich N. Decision-making under scientific uncertainty: the economics of the precautionary principle. J. Risk Uncertain. 2003, 27:77-103.
    • (2003) J. Risk Uncertain. , vol.27 , pp. 77-103
    • Gollier, C.1    Treich, N.2
  • 32
    • 0000984760 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientific progress and irreversibility: an economic interpretation of the 'Precautionary Principle'
    • Gollier C., Jullien B., Treich N. Scientific progress and irreversibility: an economic interpretation of the 'Precautionary Principle'. J. Public Econ. 2000, 75:229-253.
    • (2000) J. Public Econ. , vol.75 , pp. 229-253
    • Gollier, C.1    Jullien, B.2    Treich, N.3
  • 34
    • 0000689508 scopus 로고
    • Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility
    • Harsanyi J. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J. Polit. Econ. 1955, 63:309-321.
    • (1955) J. Polit. Econ. , vol.63 , pp. 309-321
    • Harsanyi, J.1
  • 35
    • 84971720869 scopus 로고
    • Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality?
    • Harsanyi J. Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality?. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 1975, 69:594-606.
    • (1975) Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. , vol.69 , pp. 594-606
    • Harsanyi, J.1
  • 43
    • 0011605274 scopus 로고
    • Choice under partial uncertainty
    • Kelsey D. Choice under partial uncertainty. Int. Econ. Rev. 1993, 34:297.
    • (1993) Int. Econ. Rev. , vol.34 , pp. 297
    • Kelsey, D.1
  • 44
    • 0011619060 scopus 로고
    • Maxmin expected utility and weight of evidence
    • Kelsey D. Maxmin expected utility and weight of evidence. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 1994, 46:425-444.
    • (1994) Oxf. Econ. Pap. , vol.46 , pp. 425-444
    • Kelsey, D.1
  • 46
    • 33644553294 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity
    • Klibanoff P., Marinacci M., Mukerji S. A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 2005, 73:1849-1892.
    • (2005) Econometrica , vol.73 , pp. 1849-1892
    • Klibanoff, P.1    Marinacci, M.2    Mukerji, S.3
  • 48
    • 0040069490 scopus 로고
    • On indeterminate probabilities
    • Levi I. On indeterminate probabilities. J. Philos. 1974, 71:391-418.
    • (1974) J. Philos. , vol.71 , pp. 391-418
    • Levi, I.1
  • 49
    • 33750604953 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • (How) Can we value health, safety and the environment?
    • Loomes G. (How) Can we value health, safety and the environment?. J. Econ. Psychol. 2006, 27:713-736.
    • (2006) J. Econ. Psychol. , vol.27 , pp. 713-736
    • Loomes, G.1
  • 50
    • 79953050377 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Runaway climate change: a justice-based case for precautions
    • McKinnon C. Runaway climate change: a justice-based case for precautions. J. Soc. Philos. 2009, 40:187-203.
    • (2009) J. Soc. Philos. , vol.40 , pp. 187-203
    • McKinnon, C.1
  • 51
    • 77949619310 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Coping rationally with ambiguity: robustness versus ambiguity-aversion
    • Nehring K. Coping rationally with ambiguity: robustness versus ambiguity-aversion. Econ. Philos. 2009, 25:303-334.
    • (2009) Econ. Philos. , vol.25 , pp. 303-334
    • Nehring, K.1
  • 53
    • 0002297568 scopus 로고
    • Reserved rationality and the precautionary principle
    • Columbia U.P, New York, R. Costanza (Ed.)
    • Perrings C. Reserved rationality and the precautionary principle. Ecological Economics 1991, Columbia U.P, New York. R. Costanza (Ed.).
    • (1991) Ecological Economics
    • Perrings, C.1
  • 54
    • 34047128693 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The precautionary principle should not be used as a basis for decision-making
    • Peterson M. The precautionary principle should not be used as a basis for decision-making. EMBO Rep. 2007, 8:305-308.
    • (2007) EMBO Rep. , vol.8 , pp. 305-308
    • Peterson, M.1
  • 55
    • 77953756438 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Uncertainty and climate change policy
    • Quiggin J. Uncertainty and climate change policy. Econ. Anal. Policy 2008, 38:203-210.
    • (2008) Econ. Anal. Policy , vol.38 , pp. 203-210
    • Quiggin, J.1
  • 57
    • 0001776741 scopus 로고
    • Truth and probability
    • Kegan Paul, London, R.B. Braithwaite (Ed.)
    • Ramsey F. Truth and probability. The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Essays 1931, 156-198. Kegan Paul, London. R.B. Braithwaite (Ed.).
    • (1931) The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Essays , pp. 156-198
    • Ramsey, F.1
  • 59
    • 65549159451 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reply to Alexander and Musgrave
    • Harvard U.P, Harvard, S. Freeman (Ed.)
    • Rawls J. Reply to Alexander and Musgrave. John Rawls: Collected Papers 1999, Harvard U.P, Harvard. S. Freeman (Ed.).
    • (1999) John Rawls: Collected Papers
    • Rawls, J.1
  • 60
    • 77955054640 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Climate change: a profile of US climate scientists' perspectives
    • Rosenberg S., Vedlitz A., Cowman D., Zahran S. Climate change: a profile of US climate scientists' perspectives. Clim. Chang. 2010, 101:311-329.
    • (2010) Clim. Chang. , vol.101 , pp. 311-329
    • Rosenberg, S.1    Vedlitz, A.2    Cowman, D.3    Zahran, S.4
  • 61
    • 84971922604 scopus 로고
    • Keynesian uncertainty and the weight of arguments
    • Runde J. Keynesian uncertainty and the weight of arguments. Econ. Philos. 1990, 6:275-292.
    • (1990) Econ. Philos. , vol.6 , pp. 275-292
    • Runde, J.1
  • 62
    • 22844453938 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dimensions of the precautionary principle
    • Sandin P. Dimensions of the precautionary principle. Hum. Ecol. Risk. Assess. 1999, 5:889-907.
    • (1999) Hum. Ecol. Risk. Assess. , vol.5 , pp. 889-907
    • Sandin, P.1
  • 63
    • 10844247314 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The precautionary principle and the concept of precaution
    • Sandin P. The precautionary principle and the concept of precaution. Environ. Values 2004, 13:461-475.
    • (2004) Environ. Values , vol.13 , pp. 461-475
    • Sandin, P.1
  • 67
    • 37349106780 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why environmental and resource economists should care about non-expected utility models
    • Shaw W.D., Woodward R.T. Why environmental and resource economists should care about non-expected utility models. Resour. Energy Econ. 2008, 30:66-89.
    • (2008) Resour. Energy Econ. , vol.30 , pp. 66-89
    • Shaw, W.D.1    Woodward, R.T.2
  • 70
    • 84866459520 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Precautionary Principle
    • Blackwell, Oxford, J. Olsen, S. Pedersen, V. Hendricks (Eds.)
    • Stirling A. The Precautionary Principle. A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology 2009, Blackwell, Oxford. J. Olsen, S. Pedersen, V. Hendricks (Eds.).
    • (2009) A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology
    • Stirling, A.1
  • 74
    • 84866442622 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Optimal climate policy is a utopia
    • van den Bergh J. Optimal climate policy is a utopia. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 32:43-61.
    • (2004) Ecol. Econ. , vol.32 , pp. 43-61
    • van den Bergh, J.1
  • 75
    • 77955050494 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Safe climate policy is affordable - 12 reasons
    • van den Bergh J. Safe climate policy is affordable - 12 reasons. Clim. Chang. 2010, 101:339-385.
    • (2010) Clim. Chang. , vol.101 , pp. 339-385
    • van den Bergh, J.1
  • 76
    • 35348993238 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A review of the Stern Review on the economics of climate change
    • Weitzman M. A review of the Stern Review on the economics of climate change. J. Econ. Lit. 2007, 45:703-724.
    • (2007) J. Econ. Lit. , vol.45 , pp. 703-724
    • Weitzman, M.1
  • 77
    • 69649097412 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change
    • Weitzman M.L. On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2009, 91:1-19.
    • (2009) Rev. Econ. Stat. , vol.91 , pp. 1-19
    • Weitzman, M.L.1
  • 80
    • 0031392331 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to decide when experts disagree
    • Woodward R., Bishop R. How to decide when experts disagree. Land Econ. 1997, 73:492-507.
    • (1997) Land Econ. , vol.73 , pp. 492-507
    • Woodward, R.1    Bishop, R.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.