A max-margin riffled independence model for image tag ranking

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 3103-3110

  Lan, Tian ^a   Mori, Greg ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION APPLICATIONS; IMAGE CONTENT; INDEPENDENCE MODELS; RANK LISTS; STRUCTURED LEARNING; TAG RANKINGS;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

EID: 84887364095     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2013.399     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. A. C. Berg, T. Berg, H. D. III, J. Dodge, A. Goyal, X. Han, A. Mensch, M. Mitchell, A. Sood, K. Stratos, and K. Yamaguchi. Understanding and predicting importance in images. In CVPR, 2012.
2. K. Barnard, P. Duygulu, D. Forsyth, N. de Freitas, D. M. Blei, and M. I. Jordan. Matching words and pictures. JMLR, 2003.
3. T. L. Berg, A. C. Berg, J. Edwards, and D. Forsyth. Who's in the picture. In NIPS. 2004.
4. O. Chapelle, Q. Le, and A. Smola. Large margin optimization of ranking measures. In NIPS Workshop on Learning to Rank, 2007.
5. C. Desai, D. Ramanan, and C. Fowlkes. Discriminative models for multi-class object layout. In ICCV, 2009.
6. T.-M.-T. Do and T. Artieres. Large margin training for hidden markov models with partially observed states. In ICML, 2009.
7. A. Farhadi, I. Endres, D. Hoiem, and D. Forsyth. Describing objects by their attributes. In CVPR, 2009.
8. C. Galleguillos, A. Rabinovich, and S. Belongie. Object categorization using co-occurrence, location and appearance. In CVPR, 2008.
9. M. Guillaumin, T. Mensink, J. Verbeek, and C. Schmid. Tagprop: Discriminative metric learning in nearest neighbor models for image auto-annotation. In ICCV, 2009.
10. J. Huang and C. Guestrin. Riffled independence for ranked data. In NIPS, 2009.
11. J. Huang and C. Guestrin. Learning hierarchical riffle independent groupings from rankings. In ICML, 2010.
12. S. J. Hwang and K. Grauman. Accounting for the relative importance of objects in image retrieval. In BMVC, 2010.
13. S. J. Hwang and K. Grauman. Reading between the lines: Object localization using implicit cues from image tags. In CVPR, 2010.
14. T. Joachims. Training linear SVMs in linear time. In SIGKDD, 2006.
15. D. Liu, X.-S. Hua, L. Yang, M. Wang, and H.-J. Zhang. Tag ranking. In WWW, 2009.
16. G. Patterson and J. Hays. Sun attribute database: Discovering, annotating, and recognizing scene attributes. In CVPR, 2012.
17. R. Rensink, J. ORegan, and J. Clark. To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychol. Sci., 1997.
18. B. C. Russell, A. Torralba, K. P. Murphy, and W. T. Freeman. LabelMe: A database and web-based tool for image annotation. IJCV, 2008.
19. B. Siddiquie, R. S. Feris, and L. S. Davis. Image ranking and retrieval based on multi-attribute queries. In ICCV, 2011.
20. R. Socher and L. Fei-Fei. Connecting modalities: Semisupervised segmentation and annotation of images using unaligned text corpora. In CVPR, 2010.
21. M. Spain and P. Perona. Measuring and predicting object importance. IJCV, 2010.
22. Y. Wang and G. Mori. A discriminative latent model of image region and object tag correspondence. In NIPS. 2010.
23. J. Xiao, J. Hays, K. A. Ehinger, A. Oliva, and A. Torralba. Sun database: Large-scale scene recognition from abbey to zoo. In CVPR, 2010.