From local similarity to global coding: An application to image classification

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 2794-2801

  Shaban, Amirreza ^a   Rabiee, Hamid R ^a   Farajtabar, Mehrdad ^b   Ghazvininejad, Marjan ^c  

^a SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^c EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bag of Words; Global Coding; Image Classification; Manifold Learning

Indexed keywords

BAG OF WORDS; BAG-OF-WORDS MODELS; CLASSIFICATION DATASETS; GLOBAL CODING; LOCAL SIMILARITY MEASURE; MANIFOLD LEARNING; MANIFOLD STRUCTURES; NONLINEAR STRUCTURE;

FEATURE EXTRACTION;

IMAGE CLASSIFICATION;

EID: 84887354036     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2013.360     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. A. Agarwal and B. Triggs. Recovering 3d human pose from monocular images. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli gence, IEEE Transactions on, 28(1):44-58, 2006.
2. M. Belkin, P. Niyogi, and V. Sindhwani. Manifold regularization: A geometric framework for learning from labeled and unlabeled examples. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:2399-2434, 2006.
3. O. Boiman, E. Shechtman, and M. Irani. In defense of nearest-neighbor based image classification. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008. CVPR 2008. IEEE Conference on, pages 1-8. Ieee, 2008.
4. O. Chapelle, B. Schölkopf, and A. Zien, editors. Semi-Supervised Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006.
5. G. Csurka, C. Dance, L. Fan, J. Willamowski, and C. Bray. Visual categorization with bags of keypoints. In Workshop on statistical learning in computer vision, ECCV, volume 1, page 22, 2004.
6. M. Farajtabar, A. Shaban, H. Rabiee, and M. Rohban. Manifold coarse graining for online semi-supervised learning. Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 391-406, 2011.
7. L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus, and P. Perona. Learning generative visual models from few training examples: An incremental bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 106(1):59-70, 2007.
8. R. Fergus, P. Perona, and A. Zisserman. A sparse object category model for efficient learning and exhaustive recognition. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conference on, volume 1, pages 380-387. IEEE, 2005.
9. A. Frank and A. Asuncion. UCI machine learning repository, 2010.
10. S. Gao, I. Tsang, L. Chia, and P. Zhao. Local features are not lonely-laplacian sparse coding for image classification. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010 IEEE Conference on, pages 3555-3561. IEEE, 2010.
11. A. Goldberg, M. Li, and X. Zhu. Online manifold regularization: A new learning setting and empirical study. Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 393-407, 2008.
12. G. Griffin, A. Holub, and P. Perona. Caltech-256 object category dataset. Technical Report 7694, California Institute of Technology, 2007.
13. M. S. T. Jaakkola. Partially labeled classification with markov random walks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14: Proceedings of the 2002 Conference, volume 2, page 945. MIT Press, 2002.
14. A. Krizhevsky and G. Hinton. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. Master's thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 2009.
15. S. Lazebnik, C. Schmid, and J. Ponce. Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, volume 2, pages 2169-2178. Ieee, 2006.
16. L. Li, H. Su, Y. Lim, and L. Fei-Fei. Objects as attributes for scene classification. In ECCV First International Workshop on Parts and Attributes, 2010.
17. L. Liu, L. Wang, and X. Liu. In Defense of Soft-assignment Coding. 2011.
18. D. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International journal of computer vision, 60(2):91-110, 2004.
19. F. Perronnin, J. Sánchez, and T. Mensink. Improving the fisher kernel for large-scale image classification. Computer Vision-ECCV 2010, pages 143-156, 2010.
20. J. Philbin, O. Chum, M. Isard, J. Sivic, and A. Zisserman. Object retrieval with large vocabularies and fast spatial matching. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007. CVPR'07. IEEE Conference on, pages 1-8. Ieee, 2007.
21. M. Valko, B. Kveton, L. Huang, and D. Ting. Online semisupervised learning on quantized graphs. In Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI, 2010.
22. J. C. van Gemert, C. J. Veenman, A. W. M. Smeulders, and J. M. Geusebroek. Visual word ambiguity. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(7):1271-1283, 2010.
23. J. Wang, J. Yang, K. Yu, F. Lv, T. Huang, and Y. Gong. Locality-constrained linear coding for image classification. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010 IEEE Conference on, pages 3360-3367. IEEE, 2010.
24. J. Yang, K. Yu, Y. Gong, and T. Huang. Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009. CVPR 2009. IEEE Conference on, pages 1794-1801. Ieee, 2009.
25. K. Yu, T. Zhang, and Y. Gong. Nonlinear learning using local coordinate coding. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 22:2223-2231, 2009.
26. X. Zhu and J. Lafferty. Harmonic mixtures: combining mixture models and graph-based methods for inductive and scalable semi-supervised learning. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning, pages 1052-1059. ACM, 2005.