Detection of manipulation action consequences (MAC)

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 2563-2570

  Yang, Yezhou ^a   Fermuller, Cornelia ^a   Aloimonos, Yiannis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION RECOGNITION; EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCIES; FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS; MANIPULATED OBJECTS; PRIMITIVE ACTIONS; QUANTITATIVE TESTS; SEGMENTATION METHODS; TOPOLOGICAL STRUCTURE;

EQUIPMENT TESTING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS;

GESTURE RECOGNITION;

EID: 84887345046     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2013.331     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. E. Aksoy, A. Abramov, J. Dörr, K. Ning, B. Dellen, and F. Wörgötter. Learning the semantics of object-action relations by observation. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 30(10):1229-1249, 2011. 2, 6
2. C. Bao, Y. Wu, H. Ling, and H. Ji. Real time robust l1 tracker using accelerated proximal gradient approach. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE Conference on, pages 1830-1837. IEEE, 2012. 6
3. S. Belongie, J. Malik, and J. Puzicha. Shape context: A new descriptor for shape matching and object recognition. Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 831-837, 2001. 6
4. M. Blank, L. Gorelick, E. Shechtman, M. Irani, and R. Basri. Actions as spacetime shapes. In ICCV, volume 2, pages 1395-1402, 2005. 2
5. Y. Boykov and V. Kolmogorov. An experimental comparison of min-cut/maxflow algorithms for energy minimization in vision. PAMI, IEEE Transactions on, 26(9):1124-1137, 2004. 4
6. T. Brox, A. Bruhn, N. Papenberg, and J. Weickert. High accuracy optical flow estimation based on a theory for warping. ECCV, pages 25-36, 2004. 5
7. R. Chaudhry, A. Ravichandran, G. Hager, and R. Vidal. Histograms of oriented optical flow and binet-cauchy kernels on nonlinear dynamical systems for the recognition of human actions. In CVPR, pages 1932-1939, 2009. 2
8. D. Comaniciu, V. Ramesh, and P. Meer. Real-time tracking of non-rigid objects using mean shift. In CVPR, volume 2, pages 142-149, 2000. 1
9. V. Gazzola, G. Rizzolatti, B. Wicker, and C. Keysers. The anthropomorphic brain: the mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. Neuroimage, 35(4):1674-1684, 2007. 2
10. G. Guerra-Filho, C. Fermuller, and Y. Aloimonos. Discovering a language for human activity. In Proceedings of the AAAI 2005 fall symposium on anticipatory cognitive embodied systems, Washington, DC, 2005. 2
11. B. Han, Y. Zhu, D. Comaniciu, and L. Davis. Visual tracking by continuous density propagation in sequential bayesian filtering framework. PAMI, IEEE Transactions on, 31(5):919-930, 2009. 2, 3
12. A. Jepson, D. Fleet, and T. El-Maraghi. Robust online appearance models for visual tracking. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 25(10):1296-1311, 2003. 1
13. A. Kale, A. Sundaresan, A. Rajagopalan, N. Cuntoor, A. Roy-Chowdhury, V. Kruger, and R. Chellappa. Identification of humans using gait. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 13(9):1163-1173, 2004. 2
14. H. Kjellström, J. Romero, D. Mart́?nez, and D. Kragíc. Simultaneous visual recognition of manipulation actions and manipulated objects. ECCV, pages 336-349, 2008. 2
15. K. Lai, L. Bo, X. Ren, and D. Fox. A large-scale hierarchical multi-view rgb-d object dataset. In ICRA, pages 1817-1824. IEEE, 2011. 6
16. I. Laptev. On space-time interest points. International Journal of Computer Vision, 64(2):107-123, 2005. 2, 6
17. C. Liu et al. Beyond pixels: exploring new representations and applications for motion analysis. PhD thesis, MIT, 2009. 5
18. E. Locke and G. Latham. A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1990. 2
19. D. Martin, C. Fowlkes, D. Tal, and J. Malik. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In ICCV, volume 2, pages 416-423, 2001. 4
20. A. Mishra, Y. Aloimonos, and C. Fermuller. Active segmentation for robotics. In Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2009. IROS 2009. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pages 3133-3139. IEEE, 2009. 2, 3, 4
21. T. Moeslund, A. Hilton, and V. Krüger. A survey of advances in vision-based human motion capture and analysis. Computer vision and image understanding, 104(2):90-126, 2006. 2
22. J. Neumann and etc. Localizing objects and actions in videos with the help of accompanying text. Final Report, JHU summer workshop, 2010. 6
23. K. Nummiaro, E. Koller-Meier, L. Van Gool, et al. A color-based particle filter. In First International Workshop on Generative-Model-Based Vision, volume 2002, page 01, 2002. 5
24. V. Papadourakis and A. Argyros. Multiple objects tracking in the presence of long-term occlusions. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 114(7):835-846, 2010. 1
25. G. Rizzolatti, L. Fogassi, and V. Gallese. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(9):661-670, 2001. 2
26. P. Saisan, G. Doretto, Y. Wu, and S. Soatto. Dynamic texture recognition. In CVPR, volume 2, pages II-58, 2001. 2
27. M. Sridhar, A. Cohn, and D. Hogg. Learning functional object-categories from a relational spatio-temporal representation. In ECAI, pages 606-610, 2008. 2
28. J. Tsotsos. Analyzing vision at the complexity level. Behavioral and brain sciences, 13(3):423-469, 1990. 3
29. P. Turaga, R. Chellappa, V. Subrahmanian, and O. Udrea. Machine recognition of human activities: A survey. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions on, 18(11):1473-1488, 2008. 2
30. I. Vicente, V. Kyrki, D. Kragic, and M. Larsson. Action recognition and understanding through motor primitives. Advanced Robotics, 21(15):1687-1707, 2007. 2
31. G. Willems, T. Tuytelaars, and L. Van Gool. An efficient dense and scaleinvariant spatio-temporal interest point detector. ECCV, pages 650-663, 2008. 2
32. Y. Yang, M. Song, N. Li, J. Bu, and C. Chen. Visual attention analysis by pseudo gravitational field. In ACM MM, pages 553-556. ACM, 2009. 3
33. B. Yao and L. Fei-Fei. Modeling mutual context of object and human pose in human-object interaction activities. In CVPR, pages 17-24, 2010. 2
34. A. Yilmaz and M. Shah. Actions sketch: A novel action representation. In CVPR, volume 1, pages 984-989, 2005. 2