A robust videogrametric method for the velocimetry of wind-induced motion in trees

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volumn 184, Issue , 2014, Pages 220-229

  Barbacci, Adelin ^a   Diener, Julien ^c   Hémon, Pascal ^c   Adam, Boris ^a   Donès, Nicolas ^a   Reveret, Lionel ^d   Moulia, Bruno ^a,b  

^a PIAF   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

^c ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE   (France)

^d UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Motion; PIV; Tracking method; Wind

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; BENCHMARKING; BIOMECHANICS; OPTICAL METHOD; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; VIDEOGRAPHY; WIND VELOCITY;

JUGLANS;

EID: 84887333706     PISSN: 01681923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Achim A., Ruel J., Gardiner B., Laflamme G., Meunier S. Modelling the vulnerability of balsam fir forests to wind damage. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2005, 204:37-52.
2. Baker S., Matthews I. Lucas-Kanade 20 years on: a unifying framework. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2004, 56:221-255.
3. Berry P., Sterling M., Baker C.J., Spink J., Sparkes D.L. A calibrated model of wheat lodging compared with field measurements. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2003, 119:167-180.
4. Bouguet J.-Y. Pyramidal Implementation of the Lucas Kanade Feature Tracker Description of the algorithm 2000, http://robots.stanford.edu/cs223b04/algo_tracking.pdf.
5. Bradski G. The OpenCV Library. Dr. Dobb's Journal of Software Tools 2000.
6. Carr Z.R., Ahmed K.A., Forliti D.J. Spatially correlated precision error in digital particle image velocimetry measurements of turbulent flows. Exp. Fluids 2009, 47:95-106.
7. Cholemari M.R. Modeling and correction of peak-locking in digital PIV. Exp. Fluids 2007, 42:913-922.
8. Christensen K.T. The influence of peak-locking errors on turbulence statistics computed from PIV ensembles. Exp. Fluids 2004, 36:484-497.
9. Dagnelie P. Statistique théorique et appliquée. Tome 1. Statistique descriptive et bases de l'inférence statistique 2007, Bruxelles, De Boeck et Larcier.
10. de Langre E. Frequency lock-in is caused by coupled-mode flutter. J. Fluids Struct. 2006, 22:783-791.
11. de Langre E. Effects of wind on plants. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2008, 40:141-168.
12. de Langre E., Rodriguez M., Ploquin S., Moulia B. The multimodal dynamics of a walnut tree: experiments and models. J. Appl. Mech. 2012, 79(4).
13. Diener J., Reveret L., Fiume E. Hierarchical retargetting of 2D motion fields to the animation of 3D plant models. ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, SCA'06 2006.
14. Diener J., Barbacci A., Hemon P., de Langre E., Moulia M. CR - KinePlant toolbox. Proceedings of the 7th International Biomechanics Conference 2012, 179.
15. Donès N., Adam B. PiafDigitTrack -Software to drive a Polhemus Fastrak 3 SPACE 3D digitiser and for the acquisition of plant architecture. UMR PIAF INRA-UBP Clermont-Ferrand 2008.
16. Dupont S., Brunet Y. Edge flow and canopy structure: a large-eddy simulation study. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 2007, 126:51-71.
17. Dupont S., Gosselin F., Py C., de Langre E., Hemon P., Brunet Y. Modeling waving crops using large-eddy simulation: comparison with experiments and a linear stability analysis. J. Fluid Mech. 2010, 652:5-44.
18. Flesch T.K., Grant R.H. Corn motion in the wind during senescence: I. Motion characteristics. Agron. J. 1992, 84:748-751.
19. Flesch T.K., Grant R.H. Corn motion in the wind during senescence: II. Effect of dynamic plant characteristics. Agron. J. 1992, 84:742-747.
20. Gardiner B. Comparison of two models for predicting the critical wind speeds required to damage coniferous trees. Ecol. Modell. 2000, 129:1-23.
21. Gardiner B., Byrne K., Hale S., Kamimura K., Mitchell S.J., Peltola H., Ruel J.C. A review of mechanistic modelling of wind damage risk to forests. Forestry 2008, 81(3):447-463.
22. Horn B.K.P., Schunck B.G. Determining optical flow. Artif. Intell. 1981, 17:185-203.
23. Hedden R.L., Fredericksen T.S., Williams S.A. Modelling the effect of crown shedding and streamlining on the survival of loblolly pine exposed to acute wind. Can. J. For. Res. 1995, 25:704-712.
24. Hassinen A., Lemettinen M., Peltola H., Kellomäki S., Gardiner B. A prism-based system for monitoring the swaying of trees under wind loading. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 1998, 90(3):187-194.
25. Lucas B., Kanade T. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. Proceedings of the Imaging Understanding Workshop 1981, 121-130.
26. Lopez D., Michelin S., de Langre E. Flow-induced pruning of branched systems and brittle reconfiguration. J. Theor. Biol. 2011, 284(1):117-124.
27. Moulia B., Fournier M. Mechanics of the maize leaf: a composite beam model of the midrib. J. Mater. Sci. 1997, 32:2771-2780.
28. Moulia B., Der Loughian C., Bastien R., Martin L., Rodríguez M., Gourcilleau D., Barbacci A., Badel E., Franchel J., Lenne C., Roeckel-Drevet P., Allain J.M., Frachisse J.M., de Langre E., Coutand C., Fournier-Leblanc N., Julien J.L. Mechanical integration of plant cells and plants. Mechanical Integration of Plant Cells and Plants 2011, 269-302. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. P. Wojtaszek (Ed.).
29. Niklas K.J., Spatz H.-C. Wind-induced stresses in cherry trees: evidence against the hypothesis of constant stress levels. Trees Struct. Funct. 2000, 14:230-237.
30. Py C., de Langre E., Moulia B., Hemon P. Measurement of wind-induced motion of crop canopies from digital video images. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2005, 130:223-236.
31. Py C., de Langre E., Moulia B. A frequency lock-in mechanism in the interaction between wind and crop canopies. J. Fluid Mech. 2006, 568:425-449.
32. Raffel M., Willert C., Kompenhans J. Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide 2002, Springer, 1998, Corr. 2nd printing edition (Jun 11, 2002). 1st ed.
33. Raupach M.R., Finnigan J.J., Brunei Y. Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 1996, 78:351-382.
34. Rudnicki M., Silins U., Lieffers V.J., Josi G. Measure of simultaneous tree sways and estimation of crown interactions among a group of trees. Trees 2001, 15:83-90.
35. Rudnicki M., Burns D. Branch sway period of four tree species using 3d motion tracking. Proceedings of the 5th Plant Biomechanics Conference 2006, 25-31.
36. Rodriguez M., Langre E.D., Moulia B. A scaling law for the effects of architecture and allometry on tree vibration modes suggests a biological tuning to modal compartmentalization. Am. J. Bot. 2008, 95:1523-1537.
37. Rodriguez M., Ploquin S., Moulia B., de Langre E. The multimodal dynamics of a walnut tree: experiments and models. J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME 2012, 79(4).
38. Sellier D., Fourcaud T., Lac P. A finite element model for investigating effects of aerial architecture on tree oscillations. Tree Physiol. 2006, 26:799-806.
39. Sellier D., Fourcaud T. A mechanical analysis of the relationship between free oscillations of Pinus pinaster Ait. saplings and their aerial architecture. Tree Physiol. 2005, 56(416):1563-1573.
40. Shi J., Tomasi C. Good features to track. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 1994, 593-600.
41. Sterling M., Baker C.J., Berry P.M., Wade A. An experimental investigation of the lodging of wheat. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 2003, 119:149-165.
42. Stoner G.R., Albright T.D. The interpretation of visual motion: evidence for surface segmentation mechanisms. Vis. Res. 1996, 36:1291-1310.
43. Sveen J.K. An introduction to MatPIV v.1.6.1 2004, World Wide Web Internet And Web Information Systems.
44. Telewski F.W. A unified hypothesis of mechanoperception in plants. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93(10):1466-1476.
45. Vétel J., Garon A., Pelletier P. Denoising methods for time-resolved PIV measurements. Exp. Fluids 2011, 51:893-916.
46. Westerweel J. Theoretical analysis of the measurement precision in particle image velocimetry. Exp. Fluids 2000, 3-12.