Renal tumour nephrometry score does not correlate with the risk of radiofrequency ablation complications

BJU International

Volumn 112, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1121-1124

  Seideman, Casey A ^a   Gahan, Jeffrey ^a   Weaver, Matthew ^a   Olweny, Ephrem O ^a   Richter, Michael ^a   Chan, Danny ^a   Cadeddu, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

carcinoma; complications; radiofrequency ablation; renal cell; RENAL nephrometry score

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; CLAVIEN DINDO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HEMATURIA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY MASS; LUNG EDEMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELONEPHRITIS; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; SCORING SYSTEM; STENT; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

CARCINOMA; COMPLICATIONS; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; RENAL CELL; RENAL NEPHROMETRY SCORE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; CATHETER ABLATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; RISK FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84887300479     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12276     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG,. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009; 182: 844-853
2. Long JA, Arnoux V, Fiard G, et al. External validation of the RENAL nephrometry score in renal tumours treated by partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2013; 111: 233-239
3. Liu ZW, Olweny EO, Yin G, et al. Prediction of perioperative outcomes following minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: role of the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score. World J Urol 2012; 188: 1796-1800
4. Okhunov Z, Shapiro EY, Moreira DM, et al. R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score accurately predicts complications following laparoscopic renal cryoablation. J Urol 2012; 188: 1796-1800
5. Schmit GD, Thompson RH, Kurup AN, et al. Usefulness of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system for predicting outcomes and complications of percutaneous ablation of 751 renal tumors. J Urol 2013; 189: 30-35
6. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA,. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-213
7. Best SL, Park SK, Yaacoub RF, et al. Long-term outcomes of renal tumor radio frequency ablation stratified by tumor diameter: size matters. J Urol 2012; 187: 1183-1189
8. Jacomides L, Ogan K, Watumull L, Cadeddu JA,. Laparoscopic application of radio frequency energy enables in situ renal tumor ablation and partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2003; 169: 49-53
9. Olweny EO, Park SK, Tan YK, Best SL, Trimmer C, Cadeddu JA,. Radiofrequency ablation versus partial nephrectomy in patients with solitary clinical T1a renal cell carcinoma: comparable oncologic outcomes at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 1156-1161
10. Montag S, Waingankar N, Sadek MA, Rais-Bahrami S, Kavoussi LR, Vira MA,. Reproducibility and fidelity of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. J Endourol 2011; 25: 1925-1928
11. Rosevear HM, Gellhaus PT, Lightfoot AJ, Kresowik TP, Joudi FN, Tracy CR,. Utility of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system in the real world: predicting surgeon operative preference and complication risk. BJU Int 2012; 109: 700-705
12. Hayn MH, Schwaab T, Underwood W, Kim HL,. RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2011; 108: 876-881
13. Stroup SP, Palazzi K, Kopp RP, et al. RENAL nephrometry score is associated with operative approach for partial nephrectomy and urine leak. Urology 2012; 80: 151-156
14. Canter D, Kutikov A, Manley B, et al. Utility of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decision-making of the enhancing renal mass. Urology 2011; 78: 1089-1094
15. Hew MN, Baseskioglu B, Barwari K, et al. Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2011; 186: 42-46
16. Reyes J, Canter D, Putnam S, et al. Thermal ablation of the small renal mass: case selection using the R.E.N.A.L-Nephrometry Score. Urol Oncol 2012; doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.09.006 [Epub ahead of print]
17. Lehman DS, Hruby GW, Phillips CK, McKiernan JM, Benson MC, Landman J,. First Prize (tie): laparoscopic renal cryoablation: efficacy and complications for larger renal masses. J Endourol 2008; 22: 1123-1127
18. Young EE, Castle SM, Gorbatiy V, Leveillee RJ,. Comparison of safety, renal function outcomes and efficacy of laparoscopic and percutaneous radio frequency ablation of renal masses. J Urol 2012; 187: 1177-1182
19. Ji C, Li X, Zhang S, et al. Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors: 32-month mean follow-up results of 106 patients. Urology 2011; 77: 798-802
20. Johnson DB, Saboorian MH, Duchene DA, Ogan K, Cadeddu JA,. Nephrectomy after radiofrequency ablation-induced ureteropelvic junction obstruction: potential complication and long-term assessment of ablation adequacy. Urology 2003; 62: 351-352