Utility of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system in the real world: Predicting surgeon operative preference and complication risk

BJU International

Volumn 109, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 700-705

  Rosevear, Henry M ^a   Gellhaus, Paul T ^a   Lightfoot, Andrew J ^a   Kresowik, Timothy P ^a   Joudi, Fadi N ^a   Tracy, Chad R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

nephrectomy; radiography; renal cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PATIENT CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; RENAL NEPHROMETRY SCORING SYSTEM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL RISK; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84857363061     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10452.x     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Parsons JK, Schoenberg MS, Carter HB,. Incidental renal tumors: casting doubt on the efficacy of early intervention. Urology 2001; 57: 1013-5 (Pubitemid 32455557)
2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E,. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60: 277-300
3. Jeon HG, Jeong IG, Lee JW, et al,. Prognostic factors for chronic kidney disease after curative surgery in patients with small renal tumors. Urology 2009; 74: 1064-8
4. Eisenberg MS, Brandina R, Gill IS,. Current status of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2010; 20: 365-70
5. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG,. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009; 182: 844-53
6. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA,. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 40: 205-13 (Pubitemid 38963009)
7. Weight CJ, Larson BT, Gao T, et al,. Elective partial nephrectomy in patients with clinical T1b renal tumors is associated with improved overall survival. Urology 2010; 76: 631-7
8. Ono Y, Kinukawa T, Hattori R, et al,. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a five-year experience. Urology 1999; 53: 280-6 (Pubitemid 29063312)
9. Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL, et al,. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 2000; 164: 1153-9
10. Shuford MD, McDougall EM, Chang SS, et al,. Complications of contemporary radical nephrectomy: comparison of open vs laparoscopic approach. Urol Oncol 2004; 22: 121-6 (Pubitemid 38479806)
11. Porpiglia F, Volpe A, Billia M, et al,. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy: analysis of the current literature. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 732-42
12. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al,. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 2007; 178: 41-6 (Pubitemid 46898481)
13. Bruner B, Breau RH, Lohse CM, Leibovich BC, Blute ML,. Renal nephrometry score is associated with urine leak after partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2011; 108: 67-72
14. Hayn MH, Schwaab T, Underwood W, Kim HL,. RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2010 Dec 16. doi:10.1111/j1464-410X.2010.09940.x. [Epub ahead of print]