Correction to: Deciding Not to Decide: Computational and Neural Evidence for Hidden Behavior in Sequential Choice (PLoS Computational Biology, (2013), 9, 10, (e1003309), 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003309);Deciding Not to Decide: Computational and Neural Evidence for Hidden Behavior in Sequential Choice

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 10, 2013, Pages

  Gluth, Sebastian ^a,b   Rieskamp, Jörg ^b   Büchel, Christian ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

COGNITIVE PROCESS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DECISION MAKERS; EVIDENCE ACCUMULATION; HUMAN DECISION-MAKING; MODELING APPROACH; NEURAL PROCESS; SAMPLE INFORMATION; SAMPLING MODEL; SEQUENTIAL SAMPLING;

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS; SEQUENTIAL SAMPLING MODEL;

ADULT; BRAIN; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887273360     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005476     Document Type: Erratum

References (44)

1. Townsend JT, Ashby FG (1983) The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Smith PL, Ratcliff R, (2004) Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends Neurosci 27: 161-168.
3. Bogacz R, Brown E, Moehlis J, Holmes P, Cohen JD, (2006) The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychol Rev 113: 700-765.
4. Vickers D, (1970) Evidence for an accumulator model of psychophysical discrimination. Ergonomics 13: 37-58.
5. Ratcliff R, Rouder JN, (1998) Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychol Sci 9: 347-356.
6. Heekeren HR, Marrett S, Ungerleider LG, (2008) The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci 9: 467-479.
7. Busemeyer JR, Townsend JT, (1993) Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychol Rev 100: 432-459.
8. Usher M, McClelland JL, (2001) The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol Rev 108: 550-592.
9. Fehr E, Rangel A, (2011) Neuroeconomic foundations of economic choice-recent advances. J Econ Perspect 25: 3-30.
10. Summerfield C, Tsetsos K, (2012) Building bridges between perceptual and economic decision-making: neural and computational mechanisms. Front Neurosci 6: 70.
11. Reddi BA, Carpenter RH, (2000) The influence of urgency on decision time. Nat Neurosci 3: 827-830.
12. Stanford TR, Shankar S, Massoglia DP, Costello MG, Salinas E, (2010) Perceptual decision making in less than 30 milliseconds. Nat Neurosci 13: 379-385.
13. Gold JI, Shadlen MN, (2007) The neural basis of decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci 30: 535-574.
14. Bowman NE, Kording KP, Gottfried JA, (2012) Temporal integration of olfactory perceptual evidence in human orbitofrontal cortex. Neuron 75: 916-927.
15. Gluth S, Rieskamp J, Büchel C, (2012) Deciding when to decide: time-variant sequential sampling models explain the emergence of value-based decisions in the human brain. J Neurosci 32: 10686-10698.
16. Gluth S, Rieskamp J, Büchel C, (2013) Classic EEG motor potentials track the emergence of value-based decisions. Neuroimage 79: 394-403.
17. Gilbertson T, Lalo E, Doyle L, Di Lazzaro V, Cioni B, et al. (2005) Existing motor state is favored at the expense of new movement during 13-35 Hz oscillatory synchrony in the human corticospinal system. J Neurosci 25: 7771-7779.
18. Swann N, Tandon N, Canolty R, Ellmore TM, McEvoy LK, et al. (2009) Intracranial EEG reveals a time- and frequency-specific role for the right inferior frontal gyrus and primary motor cortex in stopping initiated responses. J Neurosci 29: 12675-12685.
19. Engel AK, Fries P, (2010) Beta-band oscillations-signalling the status quo? Curr Opin Neurobiol 20: 156-165.
20. Jenkinson N, Brown P, (2011) New insights into the relationship between dopamine, beta oscillations and motor function. Trends Neurosci 34: 611-618.
21. Luce RD (1986) Response Times. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press; Clarendon Press.
22. Reeves A, Santhi N, Decaro S, (2005) A random-ray model for speed and accuracy in perceptual experiments. Spat Vis 18: 73-83.
23. Brown SD, Heathcote A, (2008) The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation. Cogn Psychol 57: 153-178.
24. Uhlenbeck GE, Ornstein LS, (1930) On the theory of Brownian motion. Physical Review 36: 823-841.
25. Donner TH, Siegel M, Fries P, Engel AK, (2009) Buildup of choice-predictive activity in human motor cortex during perceptual decision making. Curr Biol 19: 1581-1585.
26. Gould IC, Nobre AC, Wyart V, Rushworth MFS, (2012) Effects of decision variables and intraparietal stimulation on sensorimotor oscillatory activity in the human brain. J Neurosci 32: 13805-13818.
27. Wyart V, de Gardelle V, Scholl J, Summerfield C, (2012) Rhythmic fluctuations in evidence accumulation during decision making in the human brain. Neuron 76: 847-858.
28. Donkin C, Brown S, Heathcote A, Wagenmakers E-J, (2011) Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models but the same conclusions about psychological processes? Psychon Bull Rev 18: 61-69.
29. Yang T, Shadlen MN, (2007) Probabilistic reasoning by neurons. Nature 447: 1075-1080.
30. Cisek P, Puskas GA, El-Murr S, (2009) Decisions in changing conditions: the urgency-gating model. J Neurosci 29: 11560-11571.
31. Stern ER, Gonzalez R, Welsh RC, Taylor SF, (2010) Updating beliefs for a decision: neural correlates of uncertainty and underconfidence. J Neurosci 30: 8032-8041.
32. De Lange FP, Jensen O, Dehaene S, (2010) Accumulation of evidence during sequential decision making: the importance of top-down factors. J Neurosci 30: 731-738.
33. De Lange FP, van Gaal S, Lamme VAF, Dehaene S, (2011) How awareness changes the relative weights of evidence during human decision-making. PLoS Biol 9: e1001203.
34. Furl N, Averbeck BB, (2011) Parietal cortex and insula relate to evidence seeking relevant to reward-related decisions. J Neurosci 31: 17572-17582.
35. Dhar R, Simonson I, (2003) The effect of forced choice on choice. J Marketing Res 40: 146-160.
36. Kiani R, Shadlen MN, (2009) Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex. Science 324: 759-764.
37. Tallon-Baudry Bertrand (1999) Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends Cogn Sci 3: 151-162.
38. Poldrack RA, (2006) Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed) 10: 59-63.
39. Lewandowsky S, Farrell S (2011) Computational Modeling in Cognition: Principles and Practice. Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage Publications.
40. Nelder JA, Mead R, (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7: 308-313.
41. Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen J-M, (2011) FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2011: 1-9.
42. Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E, (1983) A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55: 468-484.
43. Mitra PP, Pesaran B, (1999) Analysis of dynamic brain imaging data. Biophys J 76: 691-708.
44. Kiebel SJ, Tallon-Baudry C, Friston KJ, (2005) Parametric analysis of oscillatory activity as measured with EEG/MEG. Hum Brain Mapp 26: 170-177.