Mode of gene action, heterosis and inbreeding depression for yield and its components in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Scientia Horticulturae

Volumn 164, Issue , 2013, Pages 540-543

  Shalaby, Tarek A ^a  

^a Kafrelsheikh University   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Heterosis and heritability; Scaling tests; Six parameters model; Tomato

Indexed keywords

CROP; DOMINANCE; FRUIT; HERITABILITY; HETEROSIS; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; YIELD;

EID: 84887246281     PISSN: 03044238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ahmad S., Rahman M.M., Quamruzzaman A.K.M., Uddin M.N. Genetic analysis of quantitative characters of in heat tolerant tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. Innov. Dev. Strategy 2010, 4(1):27-33.
2. Allard R.W. Principles of Plant Breeding 1960, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.
3. Amin E.S.A., Abd El-Maksoud M.M., Abdel-Rahim A.M. Genetic studies on F1 generation and genetic parameters associated with it in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ. 2001, 26(6):3667-3675.
4. AVRDC AVRDC Report 2004. AVRDC Publication Number 07-691 2007, 158. AVRDC-The World Vegetable Center, Shanhua, Taiwan.
5. Dordevic R., Zecevic B., Zdravkovic J., Zivanovic T., Odorovic G. Inheritance of yield components in tomato. Genetika 2010, 42(3):575-583. 10.2298/GENSR1003575D.
6. El-Gazar T., El-Sayed H., Zanata O. Inheritance of vegetative and fruit quality of some tomato crosses in late summer season. J. Agric. Sci., Mansoura Univ. 2002, 27(8):5473-5484.
7. Gamble E.E. Gene effects in corn (Zea mays L.). I. Separation and relative importance of gene effects for yield. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1962, 42:339-348. 10.4141/cjps62-048.
8. Hagazi H.H., Hassan H.M., Mousa A.G., Wahb-Allah M.A.E. Heterosis and heritability estimation for some characters of some tomato cultivars and their hybrid combinations. Alex. J. Agric. Res. 1995, 40(2):265-276.
9. Johanson H.W., Robinson H.F., Comstock R.E. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agronomy 1955, 47:314-318. 10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x.
10. Khalil M.R. Breeding Studies on Tomato, M.Sc. Thesis 2004, 1-99. Fac. Agric. Minufiya Univ., Egypt.
11. Mather K. Biometrical Genetics 1949, Methuen, London. first ed.
12. Mather K., Jinks J.L. Biometrical Genetics 1971, Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, UK. second ed.
13. Metwally E.I., El-kassas A.I., Abd El-moneim A., Bayomy K.E. Improving the quality of the Egyptian tomato cultivar "Edkawy". Egypt. J. Plant Breed. 2003, 7(1):551-561.
14. Shalaby T.A. Combining ability and heterosis in a half diallel cross of tomato in north Egypt. J. Agric. Res. Kafrelsheikh Univ. 2008, 34(4):1110-1125.
15. Shalaby T.A. Line×tester analysis for combining ability and heterosis in tomato under late summer season conditions. J. Plant Prod. Mansoura Univ. 2012, 3(11):2857-2865.
16. Singh A.K., Asati B.S. Combining ability and heterosis studies in tomato under bacterial wilt condition. Bangladesh J. Agric. Res. 2011, 36(2):313-318. 10.3329/bjar.v36i2.9259.
17. Smith H.H. Fixing Transgressive Vigour in Nicotiana rustica. Heterosis 1952, Iowa State College Press, Ames, IA, USA.
18. Solieman T.H.I., El-Gabry M.A.H., Abido A.I. Heterosis, potence ratio and correlation of some important characters in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Sci. Hort. 2013, 150:25-30. 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.10.024.
19. Souza L.M., Paterniani M.E.A., Melo P.C.T., Melo A.M.T. Diallel cross among fresh market tomato inbreeding lines. Hort. Bras. 2012, 30(2):246-251. 10.1590/S0102-05362012000200011.
20. Wahb-Allah M.A. A diallel analysis of yield and yield components of some tomato genotypes grown in arid conditions. Zagazig J. Agric. Res. 2008, 35(1):19-32.