Monitoring the nociception level: A multi-parameter approach

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 659-668

  Ben Israel, Nir ^a   Kliger, Mark ^a   Zuckerman, Galit ^a   Katz, Yeshayahu ^b   Edry, Ruth ^b  

^a Medasense Biometrics Ltd   (Israel)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Autonomic response; General anesthesia; Multi parameter; Nociception; Pain monitoring

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMIC RESPONSE; GENERAL ANESTHESIAS; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; MULTIPARAMETERS; NOCICEPTION; NONLINEAR TECHNIQUES; PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RECEIVER OPERATING CURVES;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT; DECISION TREES; HEART; PATIENT MONITORING; SURGERY;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

ADULT; ANALGESIA; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART RATE; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; NOCICEPTION; NOCICEPTION LEVEL INDEX; NUMBER OF SKIN CONDUCTANCE FLUCTUATION; ORDINARY LINEAR REGRESSION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PARAMETERS; PLETHYSMOGRAPH WAVE AMPLITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOM FOREST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN CONDUCTANCE LEVEL; STIMULUS;

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; AREA UNDER CURVE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; NOCICEPTION; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROC CURVE; SKIN; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;

EID: 84887220818     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9487-9     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Holte K, Kehlet H. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia-effects on surgical stress responses and implications for postoperative nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2002;21:199-206.
2. Kehlet H, Jensen T, Woolf C. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006;367:1618-25.
3. Brook A, Ahrens T, Schaiff R, Prentice D, Sherman G, Shannon W, Kollef M. Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:2609-15.
4. Kress J, Pohlman A, O'Connor M, Hall J. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1471-7.
5. Nevius K, Yvonne D. Proper pain management. OR Nurse. 2008;2:39-40.
6. Mascia M, Koch M, Medicis J. Pharmacoeconomic impact of rational use guidelines on the provision of analgesia, sedation, and neuromuscular blockade in critical care. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:2300-6.
7. Jänig W. Autonomic reactions in pain. Pain. 2012;153:733-936.
8. Benarroch E. Pain-autonomic interactions. Neurol Sci. 2006;27:130-3.
9. Schlereth T, Birklein F. The sympathetic nervous system and pain. Neuromol Med. 2008;10:141-7.
10. Loeser JD, Treede RD. The Kyoto protocol of IASP basic pain terminology. Pain. 2008;137:473-7.
11. Dowling J. Autonomic measures and behavioral indices of pain sensitivity. Pain. 1983;16:193-200.
12. Evans J. Clinical signs and autonomic responses. In: Rosen M, Lunn JN, editors. Consciousness, awareness and pain in general anaesthesia. London: Butterworth; 1987. p. 18-34.
13. Latson T, O'flaherty O. Effects of surgical stimulation on autonomic reflex function: assessment by changes in heart rate variability. Br J Anaesth. 1993;70:301-5.
14. Logier R, Jeanne M, Tavernier B, De jonckheere J (2006) Pain/analgesia evaluation using heart rate variability analysis. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. EMBS'06, 28th annual international conference of the IEEE.
15. Jeanne M, Clément C, De Jonckheere J, Logier R, Tavernier B. Variations of the analgesia nociception index during general anaesthesia for laparoscopic abdominal surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012;26:289-94.
16. Jeanne M, Logier R, De Jonckheere J, Tavernier B. Heart rate variability during total intravenous anesthesia: effects of nociception and analgesia. Auton Neurosci. 2009;147:91-6.
17. Korhonen I, Yli-Hankala A. Photoplethysmography and nociception. Acta Anaesth Scand. 2009;53:975-85.
18. Luginbühl M, Reichlin F, Sigurdsson G, Zbinden A, Peterson-Felix S. Prediction of the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation: comparison of laser-Doppler skin vasomotor reflex and pulse wave reflex. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:389-97.
19. Murray W, Foster P. The peripheral pulse wave: information overlooked. J Clin Monit Comput. 1996;12:365-77.
20. Storm H, Shafiei M, Myre K, Raeder J. Palmar skin conductance compared to a developed stress score and to noxious and awakening stimuli on patients in anaesthesia. Acta Anaesth Scand. 2005;49:798-803.
21. Ledowski T, Bromilow J, Paech M, Storm H, Hacking R, Schug S. Monitoring of skin conductance to assess postoperative pain intensity. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97:862-5.
22. Treister R, Kliger M, Zuckerman G, Aryeh I, Eisenberg E. Differentiating between heat pain intensities: the combined effect of multiple autonomic parameters. Pain. 2012;153:1807-14.
23. Rantanen M, Yli-Hankala A, Van Gils M, Yppärilä-Wolters H, Takala P, Huiku M, Kymäläinen M, Seitsonen E, Korhonen I. Novel multiparameter approach for measurement of nociception at skin incision during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96:367-76.
24. Huiku M, Uutela K, Van Gils M, Korhonen I, Kymäläinen M, Meriläinen P, Paloheimo M, Rantanen M, Takala P, Viertiö-Oja H, Yli-Hankala A. Assessment of surgical stress during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:447-55.
25. Mathews D, Clark L, Johansen J, Matute E, Seshagiri C. Lower composite variability index (CVI) was associated with better clinical global impression scores. Eur J Anaesth. 2009;26(Suppl 45):30-1.
26. Cannesson M, Rinehart J. Innovative technologies applied to anesthesia: how will they impact the way clinicians practice? J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth. 2012;26:711-20.
27. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45:5-32.
28. Laguna P, Moody G, Mark R. Power spectral density of unevenly sampled data by least-square analysis: performance and application to heart rate signals. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1998;45:698-715.
29. Minto C, Schnider T, Egan T, Youngs E, Lemmens H, Gambus P, Billard V, Hoke J, Moore K, Hermann DJ, Muir KT, Mandema JW, Shafer SL. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil: I. Model development. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:10-23.
30. Shafer S, Varvel J, Aziz N, Scott JC. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computer-controlled infusion pump. Anesthesiology. 1990;73:1091-102.
31. Egan T, Muir K, Hermann D, Stanski D, Shafer S. The electroencephalogram (EEG) and clinical measures of opioid potency: defining the EEG-clinical potency relationship ('fingerprint') with application to remifentanil. Int J Pharm Med. 2001;15:11-9.
32. Lemmens H, Dyck J, Shafer S, Stanski D. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling in drug development: application to the investigational opioid trefentanil. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1994;56:261-71.
33. Egan T, Minto C, Hermann D, Barr J, Muir K, Shafer S. Remifentanil versus alfentanil: comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adult male volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:821-33.
34. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2009.
35. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29-36.
36. Johnson K, Syroid N, Gupta D, Manyam S, Egan T, Huntington J, White J, Tyler D, Westenskow D. An evaluation of remifentanil propofol response surfaces for loss of responsiveness, loss of response to surrogates of painful stimuli and laryngoscopy in patients undergoing surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:471-9.
37. Lang E, Kapila A, Shlugman D, Hoke J, Sebel P, Glass P. Reduction of isoflurane minimal alveolar concentration by remifentanil. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:721-8.
38. McEwan A, Smith C, Dyar O, Goodman D, Smith L, Glass P. Isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration reduction by fentanyl. Anesthesiology. 1993;78:864-9.
39. Sinha P, Koshy T. Monitoring devices for measuring the depth of anaesthesia - an overview. Indian J Anaesth. 2007;51:365-81.
40. Lu S, Zhao H, Ju K, Shin K, Lee M, Shelley K, Chon KH. Can photoplethysmography variability serve as an alternative approach to obtain heart rate variability information? J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22:23-9.
41. Gil E, Orini M, Bailón R, Vergara JM, Mainardi L, Laguna P. Photoplethysmography pulse rate variability as a surrogate measurement of heart rate variability during non-stationary conditions. Physiol Meas. 2010;31:1271-90.
42. Matsukawa T, Kurz A, Sessler DI, et al. Propofol linearly reduces the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. Anesthesiology. 1995;82:1169-80.
43. Xiong J, Kurz A, Sessler DI, et al. Isoflurane produces marked and nonlinear decreases in the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:240-5.
44. Heyse B, Proost JH, Schumacher PM, Bouillon TW, Vereecke HE, Eleveld DJ, Luginbühl M, Struys MM. Sevoflurane remifentanil interaction: comparison of different response surface models. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:311-23.
45. Bouillon TW, Bruhn J, Radulescu L, Andresen C, Shafer TJ, Cohane C, Shafer SL. Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1072-353.