In vivo biocompatibility evaluation of electrospun composite scaffolds by subcutaneous implantation in rat

Drug Delivery and Translational Research

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 504-517

  Jaiswal, Amit K ^a   Dhumal, Rohit V ^b   Bellare, Jayesh R ^a   Vanage, Geeta R ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY   (India)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH   (India)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Biodegradable; Nanofiber; Scaffold; Subcutaneous implantation

Indexed keywords

GELATIN; HYDROXYAPATITE; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; POLYLACTIC ACID; POLYLACTIC ACID GELATIN; POLYLACTIC ACID GELATIN HYDROXYAPATITE; POLYLACTIC ACID HYDROXYAPATITE; POLYMER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADATION; BLOOD CHEMISTRY; BODY WEIGHT; BONE TISSUE; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL TYPE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; ELECTROSPINNING; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMPLANTATION; IN VIVO STUDY; INFLAMMATION; LEUKOCYTE DIFFERENTIAL COUNT; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SAFETY; SKIN; SUBCUTANEOUS IMPLANTATION; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE IMPLANT; TISSUE SECTION;

EID: 84887186084     PISSN: 2190393X     EISSN: 21903948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13346-013-0153-z     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Hofbauer MH, Delmonte RJ, Scripps ML. Autogenous bone grafting. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996;35(5): 386-90.
2. Burchardt H. The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;174: 28-42.
3. Sill TJ, von Recum HA. Electrospinning: applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008;29(13): 1989-2006.
4. Moore WR, Graves SE, Bain GI. Synthetic bone graft substitutes. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71(6): 354-61.
5. Anderson JM. Biological responses to materials. Annu Rev Mater Sci. 2001;31: 81-110.
6. Yang F, Murugan R, Wang S, Ramakrishna S. Electrospinning of nano/micro scale poly(l-lactic acid) aligned fibers and their potential in neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26(15): 2603-10.
7. Boland ED, Wnek GE, Simpson DG, Pawlowski KJ, Bowlin GL. Tailoring tissue engineering scaffolds using electrostatic processing techniques: a study of poly(glycolic acid) electrospinning. J Macromol Sci Pure. 2001;38 A(12): 1231-43.
8. Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L, Prabhakaran MP, Morshed M, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Ramakrishna S. Bio-functionalized PCL nanofibrous scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 2010;30(8): 1129-36.
9. Kim BS, Mooney DJ. Development of biocompatible synthetic extracellular matrices for tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 1998;16(5): 224-9.
10. Kim SE, Heo DN, Lee JB, Kim JR, Park SH, Jeon SH. Electrospun gelatin/polyurethane blended nanofibers for wound healing. Biomed Mater. 2009;4(4).
11. Jaiswal AK, Chandra V, Bhonde RR, Soni VP, Bellare JR. Mineralization of nanohydroxyapatite on electrospun poly(l-lactic acid)/gelatin by an alternate soaking process: a biomimetic scaffold for bone regeneration. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2012;27(4): 356-74.
12. An YH, Woolf SK, Friedman RJ. Pre-clinical in vivo evaluation of orthopaedic bioabsorbable devices. Biomaterials. 2000;21(24): 2635-52.
13. Kim J, Dadsetan M, Ameenuddin S, Windebank AJ, Yaszemski MJ, Lu L. In vivo biodegradation and biocompatibility of PEG/sebacic acid-based hydrogels using a cage implant system. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;95(1): 191-7.
14. Wang Y, Rudym DD, Walsh A, Abrahamsen L, Kim HJ, Kim HS, et al. In vivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2008;29(24-25): 3415-28.
15. Yin Y, Ye F, Cui J, Zhang F, Li X, Yao K. Preparation and characterization of macroporous chitosan-gelatin/β-tricalcium phosphate composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;67(3): 844-55.
16. Ji W, Yang F, Seyednejad H, Chen Z, Hennink WE, Anderson JM, et al. Biocompatibility and degradation characteristics of PLGA-based electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds with nanoapatite incorporation. Biomaterials. 2012;33(28): 6604-14.
17. Seyednejad H, Gawlitta D, Kuiper RV, De Bruin A, van Nostrum CF, Vermonden T, et al. In vivo biocompatibility and biodegradation of 3D-printed porous scaffolds based on a hydroxyl-functionalized poly(ε-caprolactone). Biomaterials. 2012;33(17): 4309-18.
18. Taguchi T, Kishida A, Akashi M. Fabrication of polymer-apatite composites by using a novel alternate soaking process. Kobunshi Ronbunshu. 2000;57(6): 324-35.
19. Jaiswal AK, Kadam SS, Soni VP, Bellare JR. Improved functionalization of electrospun PLLA/gelatin scaffold by alternate soaking method for bone tissue engineering. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;268: 477-88.
20. Dahe GJ, Kadam SS, Sabale SS, Kadam DP, Sarkate LB, Bellare JR. In vivo evaluation of the biocompatibility of surface modified hemodialysis polysulfone hollow fibers in rat. PLoS One. 2011;6(10): e25236.
21. Yin GB, Zhang YZ, Wang SD, Shi DB, Dong ZH, Fu WG. Study of the electrospun PLA/silk fibroin-gelatin composite nanofibrous scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;93(1): 158-63.
22. Hooper KA, Macon ND, Kohn J. Comparative histological evaluation of new tyrosine-derived polymers and poly (l-lactic acid) as a function of polymer degradation. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;41(3): 443-54.
23. Klompmaker J, Jansen HWB, Veth RPH, De Groot JH, Nijenhuis Pennings AJ. Porous polymer implant for repair of meniscal lesions: a preliminary study in dogs. Biomaterials. 1991;12(9): 810-6.
24. Suganuma J, Alexander H. Biological response of intramedullary bone to poly-l-lactic acid. J Appl Biomater. 1993;4(1): 13-27.
25. Brauker JH, Carr-Brendel VE, Martinson LA, Crudele J, Johnston WD, Johnson RC. Neovascularization of synthetic membranes directed by membrane microarchitecture. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29(12): 1517-24.
26. Boehler RM, Graham JG, Shea LD. Tissue engineering tools for modulation of the immune response. Biotechniques. 2011;51(4): 239-54.
27. Paul NE, Skazik C, Harwardt M, Bartneck M, Denecke B, Klee D, et al. Topographical control of human macrophages by a regularly microstructured polyvinylidene fluoride surface. Biomaterials. 2008;29(30): 4056-64.
28. Taylor SR, Gibbons DF. Effect of surface texture on the soft tissue response to polymer implants. J Biomed Mater Res A. 1983;17(2): 205-27.
29. Lee BN, Kim DY, Kang HJ, Kwon JS, Park YH, Chun HJ. In vivo biofunctionality comparison of different topographic PLLA scaffolds. Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100 A(7): 1751-60.
30. Woo KM, Jun JH, Chen VJ, Seo J, Baek JH, Ryoo HM, et al. Nano-fibrous scaffolding promotes osteoblast differentiation and biomineralization. Biomaterials. 2007;28(2): 335-43.
31. Noh HK, Lee SW, Kim JM, Oh JE, Kim KH, Chung CP, et al. Electrospinning of chitin nanofibers: degradation behavior and cellular response to normal human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Biomaterials. 2006;27(21): 3934-44.
32. Hu W, Huang ZM. Biocompatibility of braided poly(l-lactic acid) nanofiber wires applied as tissue sutures. Polym Int. 2010;59(1): 92-9.
33. Lee BN, Kim DY, Kang HJ, Kwon JS, Park YH, Chun HJ. In vivo biofunctionality comparison of different topographic PLLA scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100 A(7): 1751-60.
34. Matsusue Y, Yamamuro T, Oka M, Shikinami Y, Hyon SH, Ikada Y. In vitro and in vivo studies on bioabsorbable ultra-high-strength poly(l-lactide) rods. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992;26(12): 1553-67.
35. Robert P, Mauduit J, Frank RM, Vert M. Biocompatibility and resorbability of a polylactic acid membrane for periodontal guided tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 1993;14(5): 353-8.