Stimulating fuelwood consumption through public policies: An assessment of economic and resource impacts based on the French Forest Sector Model

Energy Policy

Volumn 63, Issue , 2013, Pages 338-347

  Caurla, Sylvain ^a,b   Delacote, Philippe ^a,b,c   Lecocq, Franck ^d   Barkaoui, Ahmed ^a,b  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b AGROPARISTECH   (France)

^c Chaire d Économie du Climat   (France)

^d Centre International de Recherche sur lEnvironnement et le Developpement   (France)

Author keywords

Biomass; Climate change; Renewable energy

Indexed keywords

FOREST RESOURCES; FRENCH FORESTS; FUELWOOD; FUELWOOD CONSUMPTION; POLICY OPTIONS; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; TRADE BALANCE;

BIOMASS; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMERCE; FORESTRY;

WOOD PRODUCTS;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; BIOMASS BURNING; ENERGY POLICY; FUEL CONSUMPTION; FUELWOOD; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; TRADE-OFF;

BIOMASS; COMMERCE; FORESTRY; RENEWABLE RESOURCES; SEASONAL VARIATION; WOOD PRODUCTS;

FRANCE;

EID: 84887140025     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.111     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. ADEME, 2005. Energies et Matières Renouvelables: Contexte et Enjeux. Technical Report, ADEME.
2. Armington P.S. A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Papers 1969, 16(1):159-176.
3. Barthes, J., Lecocq, F., Caurla, S., Delacote, P., Barkaoui, A., 2012. Would an Economy-wide Carbon Tax Hinder or Help the Forest Sector? Insights From the French Forest Sector Model. Cahiers du LEF 2012-04 http://www7.nancy.inra.fr/lef/cahiers_du_lef/2012_04.
4. Bolkesjø, T., 2004. Modelling Supply, Demand and Trade in the Norwegian Forest Sector (Ph.D. dissertation). Agricultural University of Norway (Norwegian University of Life Sciences).
5. Bright R.M., Strømman A.H. Life cycle assessment of second generation bioethanols produced from Scandinavian boreal forest resources. A regional analysis for middle Norway. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2009, 13(4):514-531.
6. Buongiorno J., Raunikar R., Zhu S. Consequences of increasing bioenergy demand on wood and forests: an application of the Global Forest Products Model. Journal of Forest Economics 2011, 17(2):214-229.
7. Buongiorno J., Zhu S., Zhang D., Turner J., Tomberlin D. The Global Forest Products Model 2003, Academic Press, UW-Madison (ISBN 0-12-141362-4).
8. Cardellichio, P., Youn, C., Adams, D., Joo, R., Chmelik, J., 1989. A Preliminary Analysis of Timber and Timber Products Production, Consumption, Trade, and Prices in the Pacific Rim Until 2000, Working Paper no. 22. University of Washington, College of Forest Resources, Center For International Trade in Forest Products.
9. Caurla, S., 2012a. Introducing Armington Imperfect Substituability in Samuelson Spatial Price Theory: Analytical Resolution of the Resulting Model. Cahiers du LEF 2012-06 http://www7.nancy.inra.fr/lef/cahiers_du_lef/2012_06.
10. Caurla, S., 2012b. Modélisation de la Filière Forêt-bois Française. Evaluation des Politiques Climatiques (Ph.D. thesis). AgroParisTech http://www7.nancy.inra.fr/lef/actualites/archives_actualites/these_caurla.
11. Caurla, S., Lecocq, F., Delacote, P., Barkaoui, A., 2010. The French Forest Sector Model: Version 1.0. Presentation and Theoretical Foundations. Cahiers du LEF 04. https://www.nancy.inra.fr/lef/cahiers_du_lef/2010/2010_04.
12. Colin, A., Barnérias, C., Salis, M., Thivolle-Cazat, A., Coulon, F., Couturier, C., 2009. Biomasse Ligneuse Forestière, Populicole et Bocagère Disponible Pour l'énergie sur la Période 2006-2020. Tech. Rep., ADEME http://www.dispo-boisenergie.fr/doc/ADEME_boisenergie_rapport_final_dec2009.pdf.
13. Colin, A., Chevalier, H., 2009. Rapport Technique Module Biologique LEF. Technical Report, Inventaire Forestier National.
14. Delacote P., Lecocq F. Fuelwood, timber and climate change: Insights from forest sector modeling-An introduction. Journal of Forest Economics 2011, 17(2):107-109.
15. Ginisty, C., Chevalier, H., Vallet, P., Colin, A., 2009. Evaluation des Volumes de Bois Utilisables à Partir des Données de l'IFN Nouvelle Méthode. Tech. Rep., CEMAGREF et IFN.
16. Hourcade J.-C., Robinson J. Mitigating factors. Assessing the cost of reducing GHG emissions. Energy Policy 1996, 24:863-873.
17. Ince P.J., Kramp A.D., Skog K.E., Yoo D., Sample A. Modeling future U.S. forest sector market and trade impacts of expansion in wood energy consumption. Journal of Forest Economics 2011, 17(2):142-156.
18. Kallio, A.M.I., Salminen, O., Sievänen, R., Sequester or substitute-consequences of increased production of wood based energy on the carbon balance in Finland. Journal of Forest Economics, inpress. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2013.05.001.
19. Kallio A.M.I., Anttila P., McCormick M., Asikainen A. Are the Finnish targets for the energy use of forest chips realistic-assessment with a spatial market model. Journal of Forest Economics 2011, 17(2):110-126.
20. Kallio M. Accounting for uncertainty in a forest sector model using Monte Carlo simulation. Forest Policy and Economics 2010, 12:9-16.
21. Kallio, M., Moiseyev, A., Solberg, B., 2004. The Global Forest Sector Model EFI-GTM-the Model Structure. Internal Report 15, European Forest Institute.
22. Kallio, M., Dykstra, D., Binkley, C., 1987. The Global Forest Sector: An Analytic Perspective. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Vienna, Austria.
23. Lecocq F., Caurla S., Delacote P., Barkaoui A., Sauquet A. Paying for forest carbon or stimulating fuelwood demand? Insights from the French Forest Sector Model. Journal of Forest Economics 2011, 17(2):157-168.
24. Lim B., Brown S., Schlamadinger B. Carbon accounting for forest harvesting and wood products: review and evaluation of different approaches. Environmental Science and Policy 1999, 2:207-216.
25. McCarl, B.A., 2013. GAMS User Guide, Version 24.0. Texas A&M University http://www.gams.com/dd/docs/bigdocs/gams2002/mccarlgamsuserguide.pdf.
26. Montagné, C., Niedzwiedz, A., 2009. Comptes Intégrés Economiques et Environnementaux de la Forêt en France: Méthodologie et Analyse Pour la Période 2000-2006. Technical Report, Convention LEF/MEEDDAT.
27. Petersen A. A comparison of avoided greenhouse gas emissions when using different kinds of wood energy. Biomass and Bioenergy 2006, 30:605-617.
28. Puech, J., 2009. Mise en Valeur de la Forêt Française et Développement de la Filière Bois. Technical Report.
29. Pyörälä P., Kellomäki S., Peltola H. Effects of management on biomass production in Norway spruce stands and carbon balance of bioenergy use. Forest Ecology and Management 2012, 275:87-97.
30. Roberts S.D., Harrington C.A. Individual tree growth response to variable-density thinning in costal Pacific Northwest forests. Forest Ecology and Management 2008, 255:2771-2781.
31. Ronnila, M., 1995. Medium-term Scenarios for the Finnish Pulp and Paper Industry. IIASA Working Paper, WP-95-38.
32. Samuelson P. Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. American Economic Review 1952, 42(3):283-303.
33. Sauquet A., Lecocq F., Delacote P., Caurla S., Barkaoui A., Garcia S. Estimating Armington elasticities for sawnwood and application to the French Forest Sector Model. Resource and Energy Economics 2011, 33:771-781.
34. Sjølie H.K., Solberg B. Greenhouse gas emission impacts of use of Norwegian wood pellets: a sensitivity analysis. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:1028-1040.
35. Sjølie H.K., Trømborg E., Solberg B., Bolkesjø T.F. Effects and costs of policies to increase bioenergy use and reduce GHG emissions from heating in Norway. Forest Policy and Economics 2010, 12:57-66.
36. Traisnel, J.-P., Joliton, D., Laurent, M.-H., Caffiaux, S., Mazzenga, A., 2010. Habitat Facteur 4. Technical Report, CLIP (Club d'Ingénierie Prospective Energie et Environnement).
37. Trømborg E., Bolkesjø T.J., Solberg B. Impacts of policy means for increased use of forest-based bioenergy in Norway -a spatial partial equilibrium analysis. Energy Policy 2007, 35:5980-5990.
38. Trømborg, E., Solberg, B., 1995. Description of a Partial Equilibrium Model Applied in the Project (Model Analysis of Norwegian Forest Sector). Skogforsk Research Paper, 14/95.
39. 2 reduction and cost for different bioenergy processing options. Biomass and Bioenergy 2004, 26:531-544.
40. Wernsdörfer H., Colin A., Bontemps J.-D., Chevalier H., Caurla S., Leban J.-M., Pignard G., Hervé J.-C., Fournier M. Impact of the heterogeneity of a forest resource on its dynamics-the French case. Annals of Forest Science 2011, 69:829-844.