Estimating Armington elasticities for sawnwood and application to the French Forest Sector Model

Resource and Energy Economics

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 771-781

  Sauquet, Alexandre ^a   Lecocq, Franck ^b,c   Delacote, Philippe ^b,c   Caurla, Sylvain ^b,c   Barkaoui, Ahmed ^b,c   Garcia, Serge ^b,c  

^a IRD   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c AGROPARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

Armington elasticities; Forest Sector Modeling; France; International timber trade

Indexed keywords

ARMINGTON ELASTICITIES; CUSTOMS SERVICES; FOREST PRODUCTS; FOREST SECTORS; FRANCE; FRENCH FORESTS; INTERNATIONAL TIMBER TRADE; MARKET STRUCTURES; PANEL DATA; ROBUST PARAMETERS;

INTERNATIONAL TRADE;

ELASTICITY;

DEMAND ELASTICITY; FORESTRY PRODUCTION; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; MODELING; PANEL DATA; PARAMETERIZATION; RESOURCE USE; TIMBER; WOOD;

FRANCE;

EID: 79961125867     PISSN: 09287655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Araujo, C., Brun, J.-F., Combes, J.-L., 2004. Econométrie: Licence-Master. Bréal.
2. Arellano M., Bond S.R. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 1991, 58(2):277-297.
3. Arellano M., Bover O. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics 1995, 68(1):29-51.
4. Armington P.S. A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Papers 1969, 16(1):159-176.
5. Balistreri E.J., McDaniel C.A., Wong E.V. An estimation of U.S. industry-level capital-labor substitution elasticities: support for Cobb-Douglas. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 2003, 14(3):343-356.
6. Blonigen B.A., Wilson W.W. Explaining Armington: what determines substitutability between home and foreign goods?. Canadian Journal of Economics 1999, 32(1):1-21.
7. Blundell R., Bond S. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 1998, 87(1):115-143.
8. Bond, S.R., Hoeffler, A., Temple, J., 2001. GMM estimation of empirical growth models. CEPR Discussion Papers 3048, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
9. Bowsher C. On testing overidentifying restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Economics Letters 2002, 77(2):211-220.
10. Buongiorno J., Zhu S., Zhang D., Turner J., Tomberlin D. The Global Forest Products Model 2003, Academic Press.
11. Caurla S., Delacote P., Lecocq F., Barkaoui A. Fuelwood consumption, restrictions about resource availability and public policies: impacts on the French forest sector. Cahier du LEF (2009-03) 2009.
12. Caurla, S., Lecocq, F., Delacote, P., Barkaoui, A., 2010. The French forest sector model: version 1.0. Presentation and theoretical foundations. Working Papers - Cahiers du LEF 2010-04, Laboratoire d'Economie Forestiere, AgroParisTech-INRA.
13. Donnelly, W.A., Johnson, K., Tsigas, M., and Ingersoll, D., 2004. Revised Armington elasticities of substitution for the USITC model and the concordance for constructing a consistent set for the GTAP model. Working Papers 15861, United States International Trade Commission, Office of Economics.
14. Gallaway M.P., McDaniel C.A., Rivera S.A. Short-run and long-run industry-level estimates of U.S. Armington elasticities. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 2003, 14(1):49-68.
15. Gan J. Substituability between U.S. domestic and imported forest products: the armington approach. Forest Science 2006, 52(1):1-9.
16. Geraci V.J., Prewo W. An empirical demand and supply model of multi-lateral trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1982, 64(03):432-441.
17. Hanninnen R. Modern Time Series Analysis in Forest Products Markets. Chapter the Law of One Price in United Kingdom Soft Sawnwood Imports-A Cointegration Appoach 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 55-68.
18. Harris M.N., Màtyàs L., Sevestre P. Dynamic models for short panels. The Econometrics of Panel Data, vol. 46 of Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics 2008, 249-278. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. L. Màtyàs, P. Sevestre (Eds.).
19. Hicks J. A revision of Demand Theory 1956, Oxford University Press.
20. Kallio, A.M.I., Moisyev, A., Solberg, B., 2004. The Global Forest Sector Model EFI-GTM - the model structure. Internal Report 15, European Forest Institute.
21. McDaniel C.A., Balistreri E.J. A review of armington trade substitution elasticities. Economie Internationale 2003, 94-95:301-314.
22. Mutanen A. Estimating substitution in coniferous sawnwood imports into Germany. Journal of Forest Economics 2006, 12(1):31-50.
23. Roodman D.M. How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal 2009, 9(1):86-136.
24. Roodman D.M. A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 2009, 71(1):135-158.
25. Samuelson P.A. Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. American Economic Review 1952, 42(3):283-303.
26. Shiells C., Stern R., Deardorff A.V. Estimates of the elasticities of substitution between imports and home goods for the United States. Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv) 1986, 122(3):497-519.
27. Shiells C.R., Reinert K. Armington models and terms-of-trade effects: some econometric evidence for north america. Canadian Journal of Economics 1993, 26(2):299-316.
28. Toppinen A., Kuuluvainen J. Forest sector modelling in Europe-the state of the art and future research directions. Forest Policy and Economics 2010, 12(1):2-8.
29. Welsch H. Armington elasticities for energy policy modeling: evidence from four European countries. Energy Economics 2008, 30(5):2252-2264.
30. Windmeijer F. A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics 2005, 126(1):25-51.