SPatial REgression Analysis of Diffusion tensor imaging (SPREAD) for longitudinal progression of neurodegenerative disease in individual subjects

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1657-1667

  Zhu, Tong ^a   Hu, Rui ^a   Tian, Wei ^a   Ekholm, Sven ^a   Schifitto, Giovanni ^a,b   Qiu, Xing ^a   Zhong, Jianhui ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Diffusion tensor imaging; Longitudinal DTI of a single individual; Permutation resampling; Spatial regression; White matter

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMNESIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS CALLOSUM; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIMULATION; SPATIAL REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY;

DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; LONGITUDINAL DTI OF A SINGLE INDIVIDUAL; PERMUTATION RESAMPLING; SPATIAL REGRESSION; WHITE MATTER;

ADULT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NERVE FIBERS, MYELINATED; NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887131602     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: 18735894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ashburner J., Friston K.J. Voxel-based morphometry - the methods. Neuroimage 2000, 11:805-821.
2. Smith S.M., Jenkinson M., Johansen-Berg H., Rueckert D., Nichols T.E., Mackay C.E., et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 2006, 31:1487-1505.
3. Nadaraya E.A. On estimating regression. Theory Probability Appl 1964, 9:141-142.
4. Watson G.S. Smooth regression analysis. Sankhyā 1964, 359-372.
5. Priestley M., Chao M. Non-parametric function fitting. J R Stat Soc B (Methodological) 1972, 385-392.
6. Gasser T., Müller H.-G. Kernel estimation of regression functions 1979, Springer.
7. Hart J. Nonparametric smoothing and lack-of-fit tests. Springer series in, statistics. 1997.
8. Chu C.-K., Marron J. Choosing a kernel regression estimator. Stat Sci 1991, 404-419.
9. Westfall P.H., Young S.S. Resampling-based multiple testing: examples and methods for p-value adjustment 1993, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
10. Zhu T., Hu R., Qiu X., Taylor M., Tso Y., Yiannoutsos C., et al. Quantification of accuracy and precision of multi-center DTI measurements: a diffusion phantom and human brain study. Neuroimage 2011, 56:1398-1411.
11. Jones D.K. The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: a Monte Carlo study. Magn Reson Med 2004, 51:807-815.
12. Zhu T., Liu X., Connelly P.R., Zhong J. An optimized wild bootstrap method for evaluation of measurement uncertainties of DTI-derived parameters in human brain. Neuroimage 2008, 40:1144-1156.
13. Alexander D.C., Pierpaoli C., Basser P.J., Gee J.C. Spatial transformation of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001, 20:1131-1139.
14. Rohde G.K., Barnett A.S., Basser P.J., Marenco S., Pierpaoli C. Comprehensive approach for correction of motion and distortion in diffusion-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004, 51:103-114.
15. Worsley K.J., Marrett S., Neelin P., Vandal A.C., Friston K.J., Evans A.C. A unified statistical approach for determining significant voxels in images of cerebral activation. Hum Brain Mapp 1996, 4:58-73.
16. Worsley K.J., Evans A.C., Marrett S., Neelin P. A three dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in the human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1992, 12:900-918.
17. Friston K.J., Worsley K.J., Frackowiak R.S.J., Mazziotta J.C., Evans A.C. Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent. Hum Brain Mapp 1994, 1:210-220.
18. Nichols T.E., Holmes A.P. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp 2001, 15:1-25.
19. Nichols T.E., Hayasaka S. Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review. Stat Methods Med Res 2003, 12:419-446.
20. Bazarian J.J., Zhu T., Blyth B., Borrino A., Zhong J. Subject-specific changes in brain white matter on diffusion tensor imaging after sports-related concussion. Magn Reson Imaging 2012, 30:171-180.
21. Chung S.W., Pelletier D., Sidka M., Lu Y., Berman J.I., Henry R.G. Whole brain voxel-wise analysis of single-subject serial DTI by permutation testing. Neuroimage 2008, 39:1693-1705.
22. Efron B., Tibshirani R.J. An introduction to the bootstrap 1993, 436. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
23. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 1995, 57:289-300.
24. Gordon A., Glazko G., Qiu X., Yakovlev A. Control of the mean number of false discoveries, bonferroni, and stability of multiple testing. Ann Appl Stat 2007, 1:179-190.
25. Schwartzman A., Dougherty R.F., Lee J., Ghahremani D., Taylor J.E. Empirical null and false discovery rate analysis in neuroimaging. Neuroimage 2009, 44:71-82.
26. Schwartzman A., Dougherty R.F., Taylor J.E. False discovery rate analysis of brain diffusion direction maps. Ann Appl Stat 2008, 2:153-175.