Representations of pitch and slow modulation in auditory cortex

Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience

Volumn 7, Issue OCT, 2013, Pages

  Barker, Daphne ^a,b   Plack, Christopher J ^a   Hall, Deborah A ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b MRC INSTITUTE OF HEARING RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c National Institute for Health Research ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Heschl's gyrus; IRN; Iterated ripple noise; Pitch; Planum temporale; Spectro temporal modulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN NERVE CELL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GAUSSIAN NOISE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PITCH; SIMULATION;

EID: 84887100894     PISSN: 16625137     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00062     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Barker, D., Plack, C. J., and Hall, D. A. (2011). Human auditory cortical responses to pitch and to pitch strength. Neuroreport 22, 111-115. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328342ba30
2. Barker, D., Plack, C. J., and Hall, D. A. (2012). Reexamining the evidence for a pitch-sensitive region: A human fMRI study using iterated ripple noise. Cereb. Cortex 22, 745-753. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr065
3. Barrett, D. J. K., and Hall, D. A. (2006). Response preferences for "what" and "where" in human non-primary auditory cortex. Neuroimage 32, 968-977. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.050
4. Bendor, D., and Wang, X. Q. (2005). The neural representation of pitch in primate auditory cortex. Nature 436, 1161-1165. doi: 10.1038/nature03867
5. Chait, M., Poeppel, D., and Simon, J. Z. (2006). Neural response correlates of detection of monaurally and binaurally created pitches in humans. Cereb. Cortex 16, 835-848. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj027
6. Devor, A., Dunn, A. K., Andermann, M. L., Ulbert, I., Boas, D. A., and Dale, A. M. (2003). Coupling of total haemoglobin concentration, oxygenation, and neural activity in rat somatosensory cortex. Neuron 39, 353-359. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00403-3
7. Edmister, W. B., Talavage, T. M., Ledden, P. J., and Weiskoff, R. M. (1999). Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions. Hum. Brain Mapp. 7, 89-97. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:2<89::AID-HBM2>3.0.CO;2-N
8. Eickhoff, S. B., Amunts, K., Mohlberg, H., and Zilles, K. (2006). The human parietal operculum II. Stereotaxic maps and correlation with functional imaging results. Cereb. Cortex16, 268-279. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi106
9. Friston, K. J., Mechelli, A., Turner, R., and Price, C. J. (2000). Nonlinear responses in fMRI: the balloon model, Volterra kernels, and other hemodynamics. Neuroimage 12, 466-477. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0630
10. García, D., Hall, D. A., and Plack, C. J. (2010). The effect of stimulus context on pitch representations in the human auditory cortex. Neuroimage 51, 808-816. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.079
11. Genovese, C., Lazar, N., and Nichols, T. (2002). Thresholding of statistical maps in neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 15, 870-878. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1037
12. Griffiths, T. D. (2001). The neural processing of complex sounds. In: Zatorre RJ, Peretz I. Biological foundations of music. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 930, 133-142. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05729.x
13. Griffiths, T. D., Büchel, C., Frackowiak, R. S. J., and Patterson, R. D. (1998). Analysis of temporal structure in sound by the human brain. Nat. Neurosci. 1, 422-427. doi: 10.1038/1637
14. Griffiths, T. D., and Warren, J. D. (2002). The planum temporale as a computational hub. Trends Neurosci. 25, 348-353. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02191-4
15. Gutschalk, A., Patterson, R. D., Scherg, M., Uppenkamp, S., and Rupp, A. (2007). The effect of temporal context on the sustained pitch response in human auditory cortex. Cereb. Cortex17, 552-561. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj180
16. Hall, D. A., Barrett, D. J. K., Akeroyd, M. A., and Summerfield, A. Q. (2005). Cortical representations of temporal structure in sound. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 3181-3191. doi: 10.1152/jn.00271.2005
17. Hall, D. A., Chambers, J., Akeroyd, M. A., Foster, J. R., Coxon, R., and Palmer, A. R. (2009). Acoustic, psychophysical, and neuroimaging measurements of the effectiveness of active cancellation during auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 347-359. doi: 10.1121/1.3021437
18. Hall, D. A., Edmondson-Jones, A. M., and Fridriksson, J. (2006). Periodicity and frequency coding in human auditory cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 24, 3601-3610. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05240.x
19. Hall, D. A., Haggard, M. P., Akeroyd, M. A., Palmer, A. R., Summerfield, A. Q., Elliott, M. R., et al. (1999). "Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 7, 213-223. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:3<213::AID-HBM5>3.0.CO;2-N
20. Hall, D. A., and Plack, C. J. (2007). The human 'pitch center' responds differently to iterated noise and Huggins pitch. Neuroreport 18, 323-327. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32802b70ce
21. Hall, D. A., and Plack, C. J. (2009). Pitch processing sites in the human auditory brain. Cereb. Cortex 19, 576-585. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn108
22. Hertrich, I., Mathiak, K., Menning, H., Lutzenberger, W., and Ackermann, H. (2005). MEG responses to rippled noise and Huggins pitch reveal similar cortical representations. Neuroreport 16, 193-196. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200502080-00026
23. Houtsma, A. J. M., and Smurzynski, J. (1990). Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 304-310. doi: 10.1121/1.399297
24. Krumbholz, K., Patterson, R. D., Seither-Preisler, A., Lammertmann, C., and Lütkenhöner, B. (2003). Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus. Cereb. Cortex 13, 765-772. doi: 10.1093/cercor/13.7.765
25. Morosan, P., Rademacher, J., Schleicher, A., Amunts, K., Schormann, T., and Zilles, K. (2001). Human primary auditory cortex: cytoarchitectonic subdivisions and mapping into a spatial reference system. Neuroimage 13, 684-701. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0715
26. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). Assessment and analysis of handedness-Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9, 97-113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
27. Patterson, R. D., Uppenkamp, S., Johnsrude, I. S., and Griffiths, T. D. (2002). The processing of temporal pitch and melody information in auditory cortex. Neuron 36, 767-776. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01060-7
28. Penagos, H., Melcher, J. R., and Oxenham, A. J. (2004). A neural representation of pitch salience in nonprimary human auditory cortex revealed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 24, 6810-6815. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0383-04.2004
29. Puschmann, S., Uppenkamp, S., Kollmeier, B., and Thiel, C. M. (2010). Dichotic pitch activates pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus. Neuroimage 49, 1641-1649. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.045
30. Schönwiesner, M., and Zatorre, R. J. (2008). Depth electrode recordings show double dissociation between pitch processing in lateral Heschl's gyrus and sound onset processing in medial Heschl's gyrus. Exp. Brain Res. 187, 97-105. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1286-z
31. Seither-Preisler, A., Krumbholz, K., Patterson, R., Seither, S., and Lütkenhöner, B. (2004). Interaction between the neuromagnetic responses to sound energy onset and pitch onset suggests common generators. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 3073-3080. doi: 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03423.x
32. Seither-Preisler, A., Patterson, R. D., Krumbholz, K., Seither, S., and Lütkenhöner, B. (2006). From noise to pitch: Transient and sustained responses of the auditory evoked field. Hear. Res. 218, 50-63. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.04.005
33. Sidtis, J. J., Strother, S. C., Anderson, J. R., and Rottenberg, D. A. (1999). Are brain functions really additive? Neuroimage 9, 490-496. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0423
34. Westbury, C. F., Zatorre, R. J., and Evans, A. C. (1999). Quantifying variability in the planum temporale: a probability map. Cereb. Cortex 9, 392-405. doi: 10.1093/cercor/9.4.392
35. Yost, W. (1996). Pitch of iterated rippled noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 511-518. doi: 10.1121/1.415873