Outcomes of percutaneous and paddle lead implantation for spinal cord stimulation: A comparative analysis of complications, reoperation rates, and health-care costs

Neuromodulation

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 418-427

  Babu, Ranjith ^a   Hazzard, Matthew A ^a   Huang, Kevin T ^a   Ugiliweneza, Beatrice ^b   Patil, Chirag G ^c   Boakye, Maxwell ^b,d   Lad, Shivanand P ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^c CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Health care cost; paddle lead; percutaneous lead; reoperation; spinal cord stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEART DISEASE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; IMPLANTED SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY DISEASE; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PADDLE LEAD IMPLANTATION; PERCUTANEOUS LEAD IMPLANTATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REOPERATION; RISK REDUCTION; SPINAL CORD STIMULATION; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL RISK; WOUND COMPLICATION;

HEALTH-CARE COST; PADDLE LEAD; PERCUTANEOUS LEAD; REOPERATION; SPINAL CORD STIMULATION;

ADULT; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EPIDURAL SPACE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICARE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REOPERATION; SPINAL CORD; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; SPINAL CORD STIMULATION; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84887074344     PISSN: 10947159     EISSN: 15251403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12065     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Shealy CN, Mortimer JT, Reswick JB,. Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report. Anesth Analg 1967; 46: 489-491.
2. Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, et al. Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain 2007; 132: 179-188.
3. North RB, Kidd DH, Farrokhi F, Piantadosi SA,. Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Neurosurgery 2005; 56: 98-106.
4. Rosenow JM, Stanton-Hicks M, Rezai AR, Henderson JM,. Failure modes of spinal cord stimulation hardware. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 5: 183-190.
5. North RB, Lanning A, Hessels R, Cutchis PN,. Spinal cord stimulation with percutaneous and plate electrodes: side effects and quantitative comparisons. Neurosurg Focus 1997; 2: e3.
6. Villavicencio AT, Leveque JC, Rubin L, Bulsara K, Gorecki JP,. Laminectomy versus percutaneous electrode placement for spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery 2000; 46: 399-405.
7. North RB, Kidd DH, Olin JC, Sieracki JM,. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous and laminectomy electrodes-part I: technical outcomes. Neurosurgery 2002; 51: 381-389.
8. North RB, Kidd DH, Petrucci L, Dorsi MJ,. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous with laminectomy electrodes: part II-clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery 2005; 57: 990-996.
9. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR,. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373-383.
10. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA,. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 613-619.
11. Bergstralh EJ, Kosanke JL,. Computerized matching of controls. Section of Biostatistics Technical Report 56. 1995; Rochester, MN: Mayo Foundation.
12. Zhu J, Falco F, Onyewu CO, Joesphson Y, Vesga R, Jari R,. Alternative approach to needle placement in spinal cord stimulator trial/implantation. Pain Physician 2011; 14: 45-53.
13. Kumar K, Wilson JR,. Factors affecting spinal cord stimulation outcome in chronic benign pain with suggestions to improve success rate. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2007; 97: 91-99.
14. North RB, Ewend MG, Lawton MT, Piantadosi S,. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: superiority of "multi-channel" devices. Pain 1991; 44: 119-130.
15. Barolat G,. Experience with 509 plate electrodes implanted epidurally from C1 to L1. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1993; 61: 60-79.
16. Cameron T,. Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg 2004; 100: 254-267.
17. Turner JA, Loeser JD, Deyo RA, Sanders SB,. Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome or complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Pain 2004; 108: 137-147.
18. Mekhail NA, Mathews M, Nageeb F, Guirguis M, Mekhail MN, Cheng J,. Retrospective review of 707 cases of spinal cord stimulation: indications and complications. Pain Pract 2011; 11: 148-153.
19. Levy R, Henderson J, Slavin K, et al. Incidence and avoidance of neurologic complications with paddle type spinal cord stimulation leads. Neuromodulation 2011; 14: 412-422.
20. Kim DD, Vakharyia R, Kroll HR, Shuster A,. Rates of lead migration and stimulation loss in spinal cord stimulation: a retrospective comparison of laminotomy versus percutaneous implantation. Pain Physician 2011; 14: 513-524.
21. Kinfe TM, Schu S, Quack FJ, Wille C, Vesper J,. Percutaneous implanted paddle lead for spinal cord stimulation: technical considerations and long-term follow-up. Neuromodulation 2012; 15: 402-407.
22. Vonhogen LH, Vancamp T, Vanneste S, et al. Percutaneously implanted plates in failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Neuromodulation 2011; 14: 319-324.