-
1
-
-
0013851199
-
Pain mechanisms: A new theory
-
Melzack R, Wall PD,. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1965; 150: 971-979.
-
(1965)
Science
, vol.150
, pp. 971-979
-
-
Melzack, R.1
Wall, P.D.2
-
2
-
-
0014102144
-
Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: Preliminary clinical report
-
Shealy CN, Mortimer JT, Reswick JB,. Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report. Anesth Analg 1967; 46: 489-491.
-
(1967)
Anesth Analg
, vol.46
, pp. 489-491
-
-
Shealy, C.N.1
Mortimer, J.T.2
Reswick, J.B.3
-
3
-
-
85052608981
-
Factors affecting spinal cord stimulation outcome in chronic benign pain with suggestions to improve success rate
-
Kumar K, Wilson JR,. Factors affecting spinal cord stimulation outcome in chronic benign pain with suggestions to improve success rate. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2007; 97: 91-99.
-
(2007)
Acta Neurochir Suppl
, vol.97
, pp. 91-99
-
-
Kumar, K.1
Wilson, J.R.2
-
4
-
-
0027523542
-
Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: Experience over two decades
-
discussion 394-385.
-
North RB, Kidd DH, Zahurak M, James CS, Long DM,. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: experience over two decades. Neurosurgery 1993; 32: 384-394; discussion 394-385.
-
(1993)
Neurosurgery
, vol.32
, pp. 384-394
-
-
North, R.B.1
Kidd, D.H.2
Zahurak, M.3
James, C.S.4
Long, D.M.5
-
5
-
-
0026093415
-
Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: Superiority of "multi-channel" devices
-
North RB, Ewend MG, Lawton MT, Piantadosi S,. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: superiority of "multi-channel" devices. Pain 1991; 44: 119-130.
-
(1991)
Pain
, vol.44
, pp. 119-130
-
-
North, R.B.1
Ewend, M.G.2
Lawton, M.T.3
Piantadosi, S.4
-
7
-
-
1542287962
-
Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: A 20-year literature review
-
Cameron T., Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg 2004; 100 (3 Suppl. Spine): 254-267. (Pubitemid 38294988)
-
(2004)
Journal of Neurosurgery
, vol.100
, Issue.3 SUPPL.
, pp. 254-267
-
-
Cameron, T.1
-
8
-
-
1342342981
-
Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome or complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review of effectiveness and complications
-
DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.016
-
Turner JA, Loeser JD, Deyo RA, Sanders SB,. Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome or complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Pain 2004; 108: 137-147. (Pubitemid 38251683)
-
(2004)
Pain
, vol.108
, Issue.1-2
, pp. 137-147
-
-
Turner, J.A.1
Loeser, J.D.2
Deyo, R.A.3
Sanders, S.B.4
-
9
-
-
56749091437
-
The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained: A 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation
-
discussion 770.
-
Kumar K, Taylor R, Jacques L, et al,. The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained: a 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery 2008; 63: 762-770; discussion 770.
-
(2008)
Neurosurgery
, vol.63
, pp. 762-770
-
-
Kumar, K.1
Taylor, R.2
Jacques, L.3
-
10
-
-
11144221468
-
Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: A randomized, controlled trial
-
DOI 10.1227/01.NEU.0000144839.65524.E0
-
North RB, Kidd DH, Farrokhi F, Piantadosi SA,. Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Neurosurgery 2005; 56: 98-106; discussion 106-107. (Pubitemid 40053987)
-
(2005)
Neurosurgery
, vol.56
, Issue.1
, pp. 98-106
-
-
North, R.B.1
Kidd, D.H.2
Farrokhi, F.3
Piantadosi, S.A.4
-
11
-
-
0031828564
-
Epidural spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain-some predictors of success. A 15-year experience
-
discussion 120-111.
-
Kumar K, Toth C, Nath RK, Laing P,. Epidural spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain-some predictors of success. A 15-year experience. Surg Neurol 1998; 50: 110-120; discussion 120-111.
-
(1998)
Surg Neurol
, vol.50
, pp. 110-120
-
-
Kumar, K.1
Toth, C.2
Nath, R.K.3
Laing, P.4
-
12
-
-
0033981759
-
Laminectomy versus percutaneous electrode placement for spinal cord stimulation
-
discussion 405-396.
-
Villavicencio AT, Leveque JC, Rubin L, Bulsara K, Gorecki JP,. Laminectomy versus percutaneous electrode placement for spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery 2000; 46: 399-405; discussion 405-396.
-
(2000)
Neurosurgery
, vol.46
, pp. 399-405
-
-
Villavicencio, A.T.1
Leveque, J.C.2
Rubin, L.3
Bulsara, K.4
Gorecki, J.P.5
-
13
-
-
85052610509
-
Hardware failures in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic benign pain of spinal origin
-
Rainov NG, Heidecke V,. Hardware failures in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic benign pain of spinal origin. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2007; 97: 101-104.
-
(2007)
Acta Neurochir Suppl
, vol.97
, pp. 101-104
-
-
Rainov, N.G.1
Heidecke, V.2
-
14
-
-
85052609928
-
Minimally invasive placement of epidural plate electrodes under local anaesthesia in spinal cord stimulation
-
Beems T, van Dongen RT., Minimally invasive placement of epidural plate electrodes under local anaesthesia in spinal cord stimulation. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2007; 97: 105-109.
-
(2007)
Acta Neurochir Suppl
, vol.97
, pp. 105-109
-
-
Beems, T.1
Van Dongen, R.T.2
-
15
-
-
85052610224
-
Implantation of surgical electrodes for spinal cord stimulation: Classical midline laminotomy technique versus minimal invasive unilateral technique combined with spinal anaesthesia
-
Vangeneugden J., Implantation of surgical electrodes for spinal cord stimulation: classical midline laminotomy technique versus minimal invasive unilateral technique combined with spinal anaesthesia. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2007; 97: 111-114.
-
(2007)
Acta Neurochir Suppl
, vol.97
, pp. 111-114
-
-
Vangeneugden, J.1
-
16
-
-
77949986847
-
Testing minimal clinically important difference: Consensus or conundrum?
-
Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG,. Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum? Spine J 2010; 10: 321-327.
-
(2010)
Spine J
, vol.10
, pp. 321-327
-
-
Gatchel, R.J.1
Mayer, T.G.2
-
17
-
-
54449084430
-
Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: A choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales
-
Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berden S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY., Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 2008; 8: 968-974.
-
(2008)
Spine J
, vol.8
, pp. 968-974
-
-
Copay, A.G.1
Glassman, S.D.2
Subach, B.R.3
Berden, S.4
Schuler, T.C.5
Carreon, L.Y.6
-
18
-
-
0023598247
-
A new method for targeting a spinal stimulator: Quantitatively paired comparisons
-
Law JD., A new method for targeting a spinal stimulator: quantitatively paired comparisons. Appl Neurophysiol 1987; 50: 436. (Pubitemid 18043180)
-
(1987)
Applied Neurophysiology
, vol.50
, Issue.1-6
, pp. 436
-
-
Law, J.D.1
-
19
-
-
77951668905
-
Burst spinal cord stimulation: Toward paresthesia-free pain suppression
-
De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Plazier M, van der Loo E, Menovsky T., Burst spinal cord stimulation: toward paresthesia-free pain suppression. Neurosurgery 2010; 66: 986-990.
-
(2010)
Neurosurgery
, vol.66
, pp. 986-990
-
-
De Ridder, D.1
Vanneste, S.2
Plazier, M.3
Van Der Loo, E.4
Menovsky, T.5
|