Beyond global measures of relative importance: Some insights from dominance analysis

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 341-350

  Budescu, David V ^a   Azen, Razia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dominance analysis; Measures of importance; Multiple regression; Predictors; Relative weights

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042568578     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428104267049     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. 2 differences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
2. Azen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 8, 129-148.
3. Azen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2004). Comparing predictors in multivariate regression models: An extension of dominance analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4. Baltes, B. B., Parker, C. P., Young, L. M., Huff, J. W., & Altmann, R. (2004). The practical utility of importance measures in assessing the relative importance of work-related perceptions and organizational characteristics on work-related outcomes. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 326-340.
5. Budescu, D. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 542-551.
6. Cramer, E. M., & Nicewander, A. (1979). Some symmetric, invariant, measures of multivariate association. Psychometrika, 44, 43-54.
7. Darlington, R. B. (1968). Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 161-182.
8. Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 9, 1218-128.
9. French, S. (1988). Decision theory: An introduction to the mathematics of rationality. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.
10. Johnson, J. W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 1-19.
11. Johnson, J. W. (2004). Factors affecting relative weights: The influence of sampling and measurement error. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 283-299.
12. Johnson, J. W., & LeBreton, J. M. (2004). History and use of relative importance indices in organizational research, Organizational Research Methods, 7, 238-257.
13. Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2002). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14. Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Neter, J. (2003). Applied linear regression models (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
15. LeBreton, J. M., Binning, J. F., Adorno, A. J., & Melcher, K. M. (2004). Importance of personality and job-specific affect for predicting job attitudes and withdrawal behavior. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 300-325.
16. Van den Burg, W., & Lewis, C. (1988). Some properties of two measures of multivariate association. Psychometrika, 53, 109-122.