The predictive value of kidney allograft baseline biopsies for long-term graft survival

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1913-1923

  De Vusser, Katrien ^a,b   Lerut, Evelyne ^a,c   Kuypers, Dirk ^a,b   Vanrenterghem, Yves ^a,b   Jochmans, Ina ^a,b   Monbaliu, Diethard ^a,b   Pirenne, Jacques ^a,b   Naesens, Maarten ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c DEPARTMENT OF IMAGING AND PATHOLOGY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTERIAL WALL THICKNESS; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; GLOMERULOSCLEROSIS; GRAFT RECIPIENT; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYALINE DEGENERATION; KIDNEY ALLOGRAFT; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY FIBROSIS; KIDNEY TUBULE DISORDER; LEUVEN DONOR RISK SCORE; LONG TERM SURVIVAL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUBULAR ATROPHY; VALIDATION STUDY;

EID: 84887060751     PISSN: 10466673     EISSN: 15333450     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2012111081     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Port FK, Merion RM, Roys E.C., Wolfe RA: Trends in organ donation and transplantation in the United States, 1997-2006. Am J Transplant 8: 911-921, 2008 (Pubitemid 351389061)
2. Meier-Kriesche H.U., Schold JD, Srinivas T.R., Kaplan B: Lack of im-provementinrenal allograftsurvival despite amarked decreaseinacute rejection rates over the most recent era. Am J Transplant 4: 378-383, 2004 (Pubitemid 38282293)
3. Summers DM, Johnson RJ, Allen J, Fuggle S.V., Collett D., Watson CJ, Bradley JA: Analysis of factors that affect outcome after transplantation of kidneys donatedafter cardiac death in the UK: Acohort study. Lancet 376: 1303-1311, 2010
4. Opelz G, Döhler B; Collaborative Transplant Study: Influence of im-munosuppressive regimens on graft survival and secondary outcomes after kidney transplantation. Transplantation 87: 795-802, 2009
5. Jochmans I, Pirenne J: Graft quality assessment in kidney transplantation: Not an exact science yet! Curr Opin Organ Transplant 16: 174-179, 2011
6. Remuzzi G, Grinyò J, Ruggenenti P, Beatini M, Cole EH, Milford EL, Brenner BM; Double Kidney Transplant Group (DKG): Early experience with dual kidney transplantation in adults using expanded donor criteria. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 2591-2598, 1999
7. Remuzzi G, Cravedi P, Perna A., Dimitrov BD, Turturro M, Locatelli G, Rigotti P, Baldan N, Beatini M, Valente U, Scalamogna M, Ruggenenti P; Dual Kidney Transplant Group: Long-term outcome of renal transplantation from older donors. N Engl J Med 354: 343-352, 2006 (Pubitemid 43145059)
8. Anglicheau D, Loupy A, Lefaucheur C., Pessione F, Létourneau I, Côté I, Gaha K, Noël LH, Patey N, Droz D, Martinez F, Zuber J, Glotz D, Thervet E, Legendre C: A simple clinico-histopathological composite scoring system is highly predictive of graft outcomes in marginal donors. Am J Transplant 8: 2325-2334, 2008
9. Arias LF, Blanco J, Sanchez-Fructuoso A, Prats D., Duque E, Sáiz-Pardo M, Ruiz J, Barrientos A: Histologic assessment of donor kidneys and graft outcome: Multivariateanalyses. Transplant Proc 39: 1368-1370, 2007 (Pubitemid 46915531)
10. Escofet X, Osman H, Griffiths D.F., Woydag S., Adam Jurewicz W: The presence of glomerular sclerosis at time zero has a significant impact on function after cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 75: 344-346, 2003 (Pubitemid 36222960)
11. Randhawa PS, Minervini MI, Lombardero M, Duquesnoy R., Fung J, Shapiro R, Jordan M., Vivas C, Scantlebury V, Demetris A: Biopsy of marginal donor kidneys: Correlation of histologic findings with graft dysfunction. Transplantation 69: 1352-1357, 2000 (Pubitemid 30238723)
12. Pokorná E, Vítko S, Chadimová M, Schück O, Ekberg H: Proportion of glomerulosclerosis in procurement wedge renal biopsy cannot alone discriminate for acceptance of marginal donors. Transplantation 69: 36-43, 2009
13. Kayler LK, Mohanka R, Basu A., Shapiro R, Randhawa PS: Correlation of histologic findings on preimplant biopsy with kidney graft survival. Transpl Int 21: 892-898, 2008
14. Lopes JA, Moreso F, Riera L., Carrera M, Ibernon M, Fulladosa X., Grinyó JM, Serón D: Evaluation of pre-implantation kidney biopsies: Comparison of Banff criteria to a morphometric approach. Kidney Int 67: 1595-1600, 2005 (Pubitemid 40463140)
15. Munivenkatappa RB, Schweitzer EJ, Papadimitriou J.C., Drachenberg CB, Thom KA, Perencevich EN, Haririan A, Rasetto F., Cooper M, Campos L, Barth R.N., Bartlett ST, Philosophe B: The Maryland aggregate pathology index: A deceased donor kidney biopsy scoring system for predicting graft failure. Am J Transplant 8: 2316-2324, 2008
16. Snoeijs MG, Buurman WA, Christiaans MH, van Hooff JP, Goldschmeding R, van Suylen RJ, Peutz-Kootstra CJ, van Heurn LW: Histological assessment of preimplantation biopsies may improve selection of kidneys from old donors after cardiac death. Am J Transplant 8: 1844-1851, 2008
17. Woestenburg AT, Verpooten GA, Ysebaert D.K., Van Marck EA, Verbeelen D, Bosmans JL: Fibrous intimal thickening at implantation adversely affects long-term kidney allograft function. Transplantation 87: 72-78, 2009
18. Hariharan S, McBride MA, Cherikh W.S., Tolleris CB, Bresnahan BA, Johnson CP: Post-transplant renal function in the first year predicts long-term kidney transplant survival. Kidney Int 62: 311-318, 2002 (Pubitemid 34754077)
19. Furness PN, Taub N, Assmann K.J., Banfi G., Cosyns JP, Dorman AM, Hill CM, Kapper S.K., Waldherr R., Laurinavicius A, Marcussen N, Martins A.P., Nogueira M., Regele H, Seron D, Carrera M., Sund S, Taskinen EI, Paavonen T, Tihomirova T., Rosenthal R: International variation in histologic grading is large, and persistent feedback does not improve reproducibility. Am J Surg Pathol 27: 805-810, 2003 (Pubitemid 36617518)
20. Sis B, Dadras F, Khoshjou F., Cockfield S, Mihatsch MJ, Solez K: Re-producibility studies on arteriolar hyaline thickening scoring in calcineurin inhibitor-treated renal allograft recipients. Am J Transplant 6: 1444-1450, 2006 (Pubitemid 44030328)
21. Haas M, Segev DL, Racusen L.C., Bagnasco SM, Melancon JK, Tan M, Kraus E.S., Rabb H., Ugarte RM, Burdick JF, Montgomery RA: Arteriosclerosis in kidneys from healthy live donors: comparison of wedge and needle core perioperative biopsies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132: 37-42, 2008
22. Kainz A, Mitterbauer C, Hauser P., Schwarz C, Regele HM, Berlakovich G, Mayer G., Perco P, Mayer B, Meyer T.W., Oberbauer R: Alterations in gene expression in cadaveric vs. live donor kidneys suggest impaired tubular counterbalance of oxidative stress at implantation. Am J Transplant 4: 1595-1604, 2004 (Pubitemid 39312293)
23. Mueller TF, Reeve J, Jhangri G.S., Mengel M., Jacaj Z, Cairo L, Obeidat M., Todd G, Moore R, Famulski K.S., Cruz J., Wishart D, Meng C, Sis B., Solez K, Kaplan B, Halloran PF: Thetranscriptome of the implant biopsy identifies donor kidneys at increased risk of delayed graft function. Am J Transplant 8: 78-85, 2008
24. Naesens M, Li L, Ying L., Sansanwal P, Sigdel TK, Hsieh S.C., Kambham N., Lerut E, Salvatierra O, Butte A.J., Sarwal MM: Expression of complement components differs between kidney allografts from living and deceased donors. J Am Soc Nephrol 20: 1839-1851, 2009
25. Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen L.C., Haas M., Sis B, Mengel M, Halloran P.F., Baldwin W., Banfi G, Collins AB, Cosio F, David D.S., Drachenberg C., Einecke G, Fogo AB, Gibson I.W., Glotz D., Iskandar SS, Kraus E, Lerut E, Mannon R.B., Mihatsch M., Nankivell BJ, Nickeleit V, Papadimitriou JC, Randhawa P, Regele H., Renaudin K, Roberts I, Seron D., Smith RN, Valente M: Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: Updates and future directions. Am J Transplant 8: 753-760, 2008 (Pubitemid 351347767)