Fibrous intimal thickening at implantation adversely affects long-term kidney allograft function

Transplantation

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 72-78

  Woestenburg, Annemie T ^a,b   Verpooten, Gert A ^b,c   Ysebaert, Dirk K ^c   Van Marck, Eric A ^c   Verbeelen, Dierik ^a   Bosmans, Jean Louis ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^c ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Fibrous intimal thickening; Graft function; Implantation biopsy; Renal allograft; Vasculopathy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY INTIMA PROLIFERATION; ARTERY WALL; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; DISEASE MARKER; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY ALLOGRAFT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ADOLESCENT; ALLOTRANSPLANTATION; BIOPSY; CHILD; FIBROSIS; GRAFT SURVIVAL; KIDNEY; KIDNEY DISEASE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FIBROSIS; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY DISEASES; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MIDDLE AGED; TIME FACTORS; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS;

EID: 58949104638     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31818bbe06     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Laupacis A, Keown P, Pus N, et al. A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation. Kidney Int 1996; 50: 235.
2. Edwards EB, Bennett LE, Cecka JM. Effect of HLA mismatching on the relative risk of mortality for kidney recipients: A comparison of the mortality risk after transplant to the mortality risk of remaining on the waiting list. Transplantation 1997; 64: 1274.
3. Sánchez-Fructuoso AI, Prats D, Torrente J, et al. Renal transplantation from non-heart-beating donors: A promising alternative to enlarge the donor pool. J Am Soc Nephrol; 11: 350.
4. Kasiske L. Relationship between vascular disease and age-associated changes in the human kidney. Kidney Int 1987; 31: 1153.
5. Curschellas E, Landmann J, Dürig M, et al. Morphologic findings in "zero-hour" biopsies of renal transplants. Clin Nephrol 1991; 36: 215.
6. Minakawa R, Tyden G, Lindholm B, et al. Donor kidney vasculopathy: Impact on outcome in kidney transplantation. Transplant Immunol 1996; 4: 309.
7. Ortiz F, Paavonen T, Tornroth T, et al. Predictors of renal allograft histologic damage progression. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16: 817.
8. Verran D, deLeon C, Chui A, et al. Factors in older cadaveric organ donors impacting on renal allograft outcome. Clin Transplant 2001; 15: 1.
9. Ojo AO, Leichtman AB, Punch ID, et al. Impact of pre-existing donor hypertension and diabetes mellitus on cadaveric renal transplant outcomes. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36: 153.
10. Perico N, Ruggenenti P, Scalamogna M, et al. Tackling the shortage of donor kidneys: How to use the best we have. Am J Nephrol 2003; 23: 245.
11. Bia MI. Nonimmunologic causes of late renal graft loss. Kidney Int 1995; 47: 1470.
12. Paul LC. Chronic allograft nephropathy: An update. Kidney Int 1999; 56: 783.
13. Bosmans JL, Woestenburg AT, Ysebaert DK, et al. Fibrous intimal thickening at implantation as a risk factor for the outcome of cadaveric renal allografts. Transplantation 2000; 69: 2388.
14. Woestenburg AT. The impactofvasculopathy inthe kidney allograft, at the time of transplantation, on the subsequent function of the graft. Belgian Society of Nephrology, Annual scientific meeting, Gent, 2006.
15. Woestenburg AT, Mensch PP, Bosmans JL, et al. The morphometric analysisofrenal vessels: The advantagesof multi-sector are approach of cross-sections. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol 2000; 22: 285.
16. Levey A, Greene T, Kusek J, et al. A simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11: 155A.
17. Bosmans JL. The development of interstitial fibrosis in cadaveric renal allografts; prospective clinico-pathological observations and patho-physiological implications. PhD thesis, University of Antwerp, Belgium, 2001.
18. Mihatsch MJ, Antonovych T, Bohman SO, et al. Cyclosporin A ne-phropathy: Standardization of the evaluation of kidney biopsies. Clin Nephrol 1994; 41: 23.
19. Marcussen N, Olsen TS, Benediktsson H, et al. Reproducibility of the Banff classification of renal allograft pathology. Transplantation 1995; 60: 1083.
20. Furness PF, Taub N. International variation in the interpretation of renal transplant biopsies: Report of the CERTPAP project. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 1998.
21. LopesJ, Moreso F, Riera L,et al. Evaluation of pre-implantation kidney biopsies: Comparison of Banff criteria to a morphometric approach. Kidney Int 2005; 67: 1595.
22. Bosmans JL, Woestenburg AT, Helbert MJ, et al. Impact of donor-related vascular alterations in implantation biopsies on morphologic and functional outcome of cadaveric renal allografts. Transplant Proc 2000; 32: 379.
23. WangH,SolezK,KjellstrandC,et al. The importanceofdonor vascular pathology in determining renal allograft outcome. J Am Soc Nephrol 1998;9: 702A.
24. Pokorna E, Vitko S, Chadimova M, et al. Adverse effect of donor arte-riolosclerosis on graft outcome after renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15: 705.
25. Woestenburg A, Sennesael J, Bosmans JL, et al. Vasculopathy in the kidney allograft at time of transplantation: Impact on later function of the graft. Transplantation 2008; 85(7 suppl): S10.
26. Thaunat O, Legendre C, Morelon E, et al. To biopsy or not to biopsy? Should we screen histology of stable renal grafts? Transplantation 2007; 84: 671.
27. Yilmaz S, McLaughlin K, Paavonen T, et al. Clinical predictors of renal allograft histopathology: A comparative study of single-lesion versus a composite, quantitative scoring system. Transplantation 2008; 83: 671.
28. Cosyns JP, Malaise J, Hanique G, et al. Lesions in donor kidneys: Nature, incidence and influence on graft function. Transpl Int 1998; 11: 22.
29. Brenner BM, Cohen RA, Milford EL. In renal transplantation, one size may not fit all. J Am Soc Nephrol 1992; 3: 162.
30. Alperovich G, Maldonado R, Moreso F. Glomerular enlargement assessed by paired donor and early protocol renal allograft biopsies. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 650.
31. Di Paolo S, Stallone G, Schena A, et al. Hypertension is an independent predictor of delayed graft function and worse renal function only in kidneys with chronic pathological lesions. Transplantation 2002; 73: 623.
32. Taub H, Greenstein S, Lerner S, et al. Reassessment of the value of post-vascularization biopsy performed at renal transplantation: The effects of arteriosclerosis. J Urol 1994; 151: 575.
33. Karpinski J, Lajoie G, Cattran D, et al. Outcome of kidney transplantation from high-risk donors is determined by both structure and function. Transplantation 1999; 67: 1162.
34. Lu AD, Desai D, Myers BD, et al. Severe glomerulosclerosis is not associated with poor outcome after kidney transplantation. Am J Surg 2000; 180: 470.
35. Moreso F, Lopez M, Vallejos A, et al. Serial protocol biopsies to quantify the progression of chronic transplant nephropathy in stable renal allografts. Am J Transplant 2001; 1: 82.
36. Randhawa P, Minervini M, Lombardero M, et al. Biopsy of marginal donor kidneys: Correlations of histologic findings with graft dysfunction. Transplantation 2000; 69: 1352.
37. Szanya J, Szakaly P, Magyarlaki T, et al. Predictive morphological findings in "zero-hour" biopsies of renal allografts. Acta Chir Hung 1997; 36: 346.
38. Mota A, Arias M, Taskinen IE, et al. Sirolimus-based therapy following early cyclosporine withdrawal provides significantly improved renal histology and function at 3 years. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 953.
39. Sugiyama S, Tsuyuki M, Okazaki Y, et al. Arteriosclerotic lesions of donor kidney and graft survival. Transplant Proc 1994; 26: 929.
40. Rossetti O, Soldano S, Aseni P, et al. Renal grafts from elderly donors: Histological studies and long-term results. Transplant Proc 2007; 39: 1820.
41. Vereerstraeten P, Abramowicz D, De Pauw L, et al. Absence of deleterious effect on long-term kidney graft survival of rejection episodes with complete functional recovery. Transplantation 1997; 63: 1739.
42. Figueiredo A, Moreira P, Parada B, et al. Risk factors for delayed renal graft function and their impact on renal transplantation outcome. Transplant Proc 2007; 39: 2473.
43. Chang SH, Toby HC, McDonald SP. Effects of body mass index at transplant on outcomes of kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2007; 84: 981.
44. Legendre C, Thervet E, Skhiri H, et al. Histologic features of chronic allograft nephropathy revealed by protocol biopsies in kidney transplants recipients. Transplantation 1998; 65: 1506.
45. Hariharan S, Johnson CP, Breshanan BA, et al. Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 605.