Developing Interdisciplinary Units: A Strategy Based on Problem Solving

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 101, Issue 7, 2001, Pages 380-389

  McGehee, Jean J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887053740     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb17972.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ackerman, D., & Perkins, D. (1989). Integrating thinking and learning skills across the curriculum. In Jacobs, H. H. (Ed.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
2. Greeno, J. G. (1997). Participation as fundamental in learning mathematics. In J. Dossey, J. Swafford, M. Parmantie, & Dossey, A. (Eds.), Proceeding of the 19th annual meeting of the North American Psychology of Mathematics Education. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse.
3. Huntley, M. A. (1998). Design and implementation of a framework for defining integrated mathematics and science education. School Science and Mathematics. 98(6), 320-327.
4. Huntley, M. A., Watanabe, T., & McGinnis, J.R. (1995). Investigating university faculty members' beliefs about integrated mathematics and science in the Maryland collaborative for teacher preparation. In D.T. Owens, M.K. Reed, & G.M. Millsaps (Eds.), Proceeding of the 17th annual meeting of the North American Psychology of Mathematics Education. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse.
5. Jacobs, H. H. (1989). The growing need for interdisciplinary curriculum content. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
6. Johnson, D., & Johnson, F. (1994). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
7. McCarthy, B. (1990). Using the 4MAT system to bring learning styles to schools. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 31-37.
8. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: Author.
9. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
10. Piaget, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
11. Polya, G. (19631987). On learning, teaching, and learning teaching. In F. R. Curcio (Ed.), Teaching and learning: A problem-solving focus. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
12. Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.
13. Rasch, K. (1994). The imperative for quality middle school mathematics curriculum and instruction. Midpoints, 4(2), pp#s???.
14. Roebuck, K.I., & Warden, M.A. (1998). Searching for the center on the mathematics-science continuum. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 328-333.
15. Rothenberg, D. (1994). Interdisciplinary curriculum in middle school. Middle School Journal, 25(4). 61–65.
16. Schroth, G., Dunbar, R., Seaborg, M.B., & Vaughan, J.L. (1994). Do you really now what you're getting into with interdisciplinary instruction Middle School Journal, 25(4), 32-34.
17. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 100-121.
18. Woodbury, S. (1998). Rhetoric, reality, and possibilities: Interdisciplinary teaching and secondary mathematics. School Science and Mathematic, 98(6), 303-311.