Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 dimensions) health states with the time trade-off method in Taiwan

Journal of the Formosan Medical Association

Volumn 112, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 699-706

  Lee, Hsin Yi ^a   Hung, Mei Chuan ^b   Hu, Fu Chang ^c   Chang, Yu Yin ^d   Hsieh, Ching Lin ^e   Wang, Jung Der ^a,b,f  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d NATIONAL HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (Taiwan)

^e NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^f NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

EQ 5D (EuroQol 5 dimensions); Health state utility; Quality of life; Taiwan; Time trade off (TTO)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA ANALYSIS; EMPLOYEE; EUROQOL 5 DIMENSIONS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; JAPAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; POPULATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RATING SCALE; SOUTH KOREA; TAIWAN; UNITED KINGDOM; VOLUNTEER;

EQ-5D (EUROQOL-5 DIMENSIONS); HEALTH STATE UTILITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; TAIWAN; TIME TRADE-OFF (TTO);

ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TAIWAN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84887018776     PISSN: None     EISSN: 09296646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.12.015     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. EuroQol Group EQ-5D value sets: inventory, comparative review and user guide 2007, vol. 2. Springer, Dordrecht, p. 21-69.
2. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997, 35:1095-1108.
3. Greiner W., Claes C., Busschbach J.J., von der Schulenburg J.M. Validating the EQ-5D with time trade off for the German population. Eur J Health Econ 2005, 6:124-130.
4. Shaw J.W., Johnson J.A., Coons S.J. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005, 43:203-220.
5. Tsuchiya A., Ikeda S., Ikegami N., Nishimura S., Sakai I., Fukuda T., et al. Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan. Health Econ 2002, 11:341-353.
6. Jo M.W., Yun S.C., Lee S.I. Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D health states with the time trade-off method in South Korea. Value Health 2008, 16:1186-1189.
7. Drummond M.F., Sculpher M.J., Torrance G.W., O'Brien B.J., Stoddart G.L. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes 2005, Oxford University Press, New York, p. 137-210. 3rd ed.
8. Badia X., Roset M., Herdman M., Kind P. A comparison of UnitedKingdom and Spanish general population time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Med Decis Making 2001, 21:1-16.
9. Lamers L.M., McDonnell J., Stalmeier P.F., Krabbe P.F., Busschbach J.J. The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Econ 2006, 10:1121-1132.
10. Zarate V., Kind P., Chuang L.H. Hispanic valuation of the EQ-5D health states: a social value set for Latin Americans. Value Health 2008, 15:1170-1177.
11. Chang T.J., Tarn Y.H., Hsieh C.L., Liou W.S., Shaw J.W., Chiou X.G. Taiwanese version of the EQ-5D: validation in a representative sample of the Taiwanese population. J Formos Med Assoc 2007, 106:1023-1031.
12. Ohinmaa A., Sintonen H. Inconsistencies and modelling of the Finnish EuroQol (EQ-5D) preference values. EuroQol plenary meeting, Hannover 1999, October 1-2, Uvi-Verlag Witte, Hannover. W. Greiner, J.M. Graf von dem Schulenburg, J. Piercy (Eds.).
13. Dolan P., Roberts J. To what extent can we explain time trade-off values from other information about respondents?. Soc Sci Med 2002, 54:919-929.
14. Saigal S., Stoskopf B.L., Feeny D., Furlong W., Burrows E., Rosenbaum P.L., et al. Differences in preferences for neonatal outcomes among health care professionals, parents, and adolescents. JAMA 1999, 281:1991-1997.
15. Williams R. Will the QALY survive?. ISPORT Connections 2007, 13:13-14.
16. Shaw J.W., Johnson J.A., Chen S., Levin J.R., Coons S.J. Racial/ethnic differences in preferences for the EQ-5D health states: results from the U.S. valuation study. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60:479-490.