Hispanic valuation of the EQ-5D health states: A social value set for Latin Americans

Value in Health

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1170-1177

  Zarate, Victor ^a   Kind, Paul ^b   Chuang, Ling Hsiang ^b  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

EQ 5D; Latin America; Quality adjusted life years; Social value set

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RACE DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOUTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA;

EID: 53749094551     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00349.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ware JE Jr., Kosinski M. Bayliss MS, et al. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995 33 (Suppl. AS264 79.
2. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, et al. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1980 34 : 281 6.
3. Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, et al. Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics 1995 7 : 490 502.
4. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996 37 : 53 72.
5. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, et al. Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 1996 276 : 1253 8.
6. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Guide to Methods of Technology Appraisal. London : NICE, 2004.
7. Greiner W, Weijnen T, Nieuwenhuizen M, et al. A single European currency for EQ-5D health states. Results from a six-country study. Eur J Health Econ 2003 4 : 222 31.
8. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997 35 : 1095 108.
9. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005 43 : 203 20.
10. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. valuation of the EuroQol EQ-5D Health States 2005. Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/rice/EQ5Dproj.htm [Accessed January 5, 2007].
11. Stata Statistical Software: Release 9.1 [Computer Program]. College Station, TX, 2005.
12. Tsuchiya A, Ikeda S, Ikegami N, et al. Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan. Health Econ 2002 11 : 341 53.
13. Johnson JA, Ohinmaa A, Murti B, et al. Comparison of Finnish and U.S.-based visual analog scale valuations of the EQ-5D measure. Med Decis Making 2000 20 : 281 9.
14. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Chen S, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in preferences for the EQ-5D health states: results from the U.S. valuation study. J Clin Epidemiol 2007 60 : 479 90.
15. Badia X, Roset M, Herdman M, et al. A comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish general population time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Med Decis Making 2001 21 : 7 16.
16. Cleemput I, Rebolj M, Szende A. Exploration of cross-country differences in self-reported health as described by the EQ-5D. In : Prevolnik-Rupel V, ed. Discussion Papers 20th Plenary Meeting of the Euroqol Group. Bled, Slovenia : Republic of Slovenia, Ministry of Health, 2004.