The SoundBite hearing system: Patient-assessed safety and benefit study

Laryngoscope

Volumn 123, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2807-2812

  Gurgel, Richard K ^a   Shelton, Clough ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Baha; bone anchored hearing aid; single sided deafness; SoundBite

Indexed keywords

ABBREVIATED PROFILE OF HEARING AID BENEFIT QUESTIONNAIRE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY FEEDBACK; BONE ANCHORED HEARING AID; BONE CONDUCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; DENTAL PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT;

BAHA; BONE ANCHORED HEARING AID; SINGLE-SIDED DEAFNESS; SOUNDBITE;

ADULT; AGED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84886946534     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.24091     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Tjellstrom A, Hakansson B,. The bone-anchored hearing aid. Design principles, indications, and long-term clinical results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995; 28: 53-72.
2. van der Pouw CT, Snik AF, Cremers CW,. The BAHA HC200/300 in comparison with conventional bone conduction hearing aids. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1999; 24: 171-176.
3. Verstraeten N, Zarowski AJ, Somers T, Riff D, Offeciers EF,. Comparison of the audiologic results obtained with the bone-anchored hearing aid attached to the headband, the testband, and to the "snap" abutment. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30: 70-75.
4. Tjellstrom A, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Albrektsson T, Branemark PI,. Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 1981; 2: 304-310.
5. Popelka GR, Derebery J, Blevins NH, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a novel bone-conduction device for single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31: 492-497.
6. Murray M, Popelka GR, Miller R,. Efficacy and safety of an in-the-mouth bone conduction device for single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 2011; 32: 437-443.
7. Association AS-L-H,. Guidelines for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry. ASHA 1978; 20: 297-301.
8. Cox RM, Alexander GC,. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear and hearing. Apr 1995; 16 (2): 176-186.
9. Murray M, Miller R, Hujoel P, Popelka GR,. Long-term safety and benefit of a new intraoral device for single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 2011; 32: 1262-1269.
10. Saliba I, Nader ME, El Fata F, Leroux T,. Bone anchored hearing aid in single sided deafness: outcome in right-handed patients. Auris Nasus Larynx Oct 2011; 38: 570-576.
11. Miller R, Hujoel P, Murray M, Popelka GR,. Safety of an intra-oral hearing device utilizing a split-mouth research design. J Clin Dent 2011; 22: 159-162.
12. House JW, Kutz JW Jr,. Bone-anchored hearing aids: incidence and management of postoperative complications. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28: 213-217.
13. Wazen JJ, Young DL, Farrugia MC, et al. Successes and complications of the Baha system. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29: 1115-1119.
14. McDermott AL, Williams J, Kuo M, Reid A, Proops D,. The Birmingham pediatric bone-anchored hearing aid program: a 15-year experience. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30: 178-183.
15. Kraai T, Brown C, Neeff M, Fisher K,. Complications of bone-anchored hearing aids in pediatric patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 75: 749-753.
16. Wong P, Freer TJ,. Patients' attitudes towards compliance with retainer wear. Aust Orthod J 2005; 21: 45-53.
17. Mollov ND, Lindauer SJ, Best AM, Shroff B, Tufekci E,. Patient attitudes toward retention and perceptions of treatment success. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 468-473.
18. Schott TC, Goz G,. Young patients' attitudes toward removable appliance wear times, wear-time instructions and electronic wear-time measurements-results of a questionnaire study. J Orofac Orthop 2010; 71: 108-116.