The BAHA HC200/300 in comparison with conventional bone conduction hearing aids

Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 171-176

  Van Der Pouw, C T M ^a   Snik, A F M ^a   Cremers, C W R J ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bone conduction hearing aid; Bone anchored hearing aid; Hearing loss; Recognition; Sound quality; Speech

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; BONE CONDUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 0033049168     PISSN: 03077772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1999.00193.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. 1 HÅKANSSON B., TJELSTROM A. & ROSENHAL U. (1984) Hearing thresholds with direct bone conduction versus conventional bone conduction. Scand. Audiol. 13, 3-13
2. 2 TJELLSTRÖM A., LINDSTRÖM J., HALLÉN O. et al. (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone: a clinical study on bone anchored hearing aids. Am. J. Otol. 2, 304-310
3. 3 CARLSSON P. & HÅKANSSON B. (1988) A Transducer for Hearing by Direct Bone Conduction. Technical Report No. 2, Department of Applied Electronics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg
4. 4 HÅKANSSON B., LIDEN B., TJELLSTRÖM A. et al. (1990) Ten years of experience with the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 99 (Suppl.), 1-16
5. 5 SNIK A.F.M., MYLANUS E.A.M. & CREMERS C.W.R.J. (1995) The bone-anchored hearing aid compared to conventional hearing aids. Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am. 28, 73-83
6. 6 MYLANUS E.A.M., SNIK A.F.M., JORRITSMA F.F. et al. (1994) Audiological results of the bone anchored hearing aid HC 220. Ear. Hear. 15, 87-92
7. 7 MYLANUS E.A.M., SNIK A.F.M., CREMERS C.W.R.J. et al. (1994) Audiological results of the bone anchored hearing aid HC200, multicentre results. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 103, 368-374
8. 8 BROWNING G.G. & GATEHOUSE S. (1994) Estimation of the benefit of bone-anchored hearing aids. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 103, 872-878
9. 9 BONDING P., HOLM JONSSON M., SALOMON G. et al. (1992) The bone anchored hearing aid. Osseointegration and audiological effect. Acta. Otolaryngol. (Stockh). 112(Suppl.), 42-45
10. 10 CREMERS C.W.R.J., SNIK A.F.M. & BEYNON A.J. (1992) Hearing with the bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA, HC200) compared to a conventional bone conduction hearing aid. Clin. Otolaryngol. 17, 275-279
11. 11 MYLANUS E.A.M., VAN DER POUW C.T.M., SNIK A.F.M. et al. (1998) An intra-individual comparison of the BAHA and air-conduction hearing aids. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 124, 271-276
12. 12 PLOMP R. & MIMPEN A.M. (1979) Improving the reliability of testing the speech perception threshold for sentences. Audiol. 18, 43-52
13. 13 MYLANUS E.A.M., SNIK A.F.M. & CREMERS C.W.R.J. (1995) Patients' opinions of bone anchored vs conventional hearing aids. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., 121, 421-425
14. 14 RINGDAHL A., ERIKSSON-MANGOLD M., ISRAELSSON B. et al. (1995) Perceived sound quality of three bone-anchored hearing aid models. Br. J. Audiol. 29, 309-314
15. 15 HÅKANSSON B. & CARLSSON P. (1989) Skull simulator for direct bone conduction hearing devices. Scand. Audiol. 18, 91-98
16. 16 HOLGERS K.-M., TJELLSTRÖM A., BJURSTEN L.M. & ERLANDSON B.E. (1988) Soft tissue reaction around percutaneous implants; a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone anchored hearing aids. Am. J. Otol. 9, 56-59