Management of laboratory test results in family practice: An OKPRN study

Journal of Family Practice

Volumn 49, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 709-715

  Mold, J W ^a   Cacy, D S ^a   Dalbir, D K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Laboratories; Practice management, medical; Primary health care

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTICE; LABORATORY TEST; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE;

DOCUMENTATION; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; LABORATORY TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; MEDICAL AUDIT; OKLAHOMA; PATIENT CARE MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, MEDICAL; TIME AND MOTION STUDIES;

EID: 0033840006     PISSN: 00943509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Abnormal laboratory test results: Going the extra mile
2. Who is responsible if a patient is not told of negative lab results?
3. Don't rely on hospitals to report test results
4. Loss prevention
5. System failures: A malpractice pitfall
6. Use of laboratory services and communication of results to patients in an urban practice: An audit
7. Audit of a system for dealing with a practice's laboratory test results
8. Notification and follow-up of Pap test results: Current practice and women's preferences
9. Patient notification and follow-up of abnormal test results
10. Notifying women of the results of their cervical smear tests by mail: Does it result in a decreased loss to follow-up of abnormal smears?
11. Replication of clinical innovations in multiple medical practices
12. Improving care for acute myocardial infarction: Experience from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project
13. Notifying women of the results of their cervical smear tests by mail: Does it result in a decreased loss to follow-ups of abnormal smears?