Stakeholder engagement for comparative effectiveness research in cancer care: Experience of the DEcIDE Cancer Consortium

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 117-125

  Greenberg, Caprice C ^a,b   Wind, Jennifer K ^a   Chang, George J ^c   Chen, Ronald C ^d   Schrag, Deborah ^a  

^a DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

cancer; CER; comparative effectiveness research; stakeholder

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RESEARCH; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

EID: 84886944657     PISSN: 20426305     EISSN: 20426313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/cer.12.80     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA et al. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 27(8), 985-991 (2012).
2. Chalkidou K, Whicher D, Kary W, Tunis S. Comparative effectiveness research priorities: identifying critical gaps in evidence for clinical and health policy decision making. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 25(3), 241-248 (2009).
3. Freeman RE. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston, MA, USA (1984).
4. Tompkins EL, Few R, Brown K. Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change. J. Environ. Manage. 88(4), 1580-1592 (2008). (Pubitemid 351984957)
5. Deverka PA, Lavallee DC, Desai PJ et al. Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. J. Comp. Eff. Res. 1(2), 181-194 (2012).
6. Charles C, Schalm C, Semradek J. Involving stakeholders in health services research: developing Alberta's resident classification system for long-term care facilities. Int. J. Health Serv. 24(4), 749-761 (1994). (Pubitemid 24379476)
7. Samson D, Schoelles KM. Chapter 2: medical tests guidance (2) developing the topic and structuring systematic reviews of medical tests: utility of PICOTS, analytic frameworks, decision trees, and other frameworks. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 27(Suppl. 1), S11-S19 (2012).
8. Hoffman A, Montgomery R, Aubry W, Tunis SR. How best to engage patients, doctors, and other stakeholders in designing comparative effectiveness studies. Health Aff. (Millwood) 29(10), 1834-1841 (2010).
9. Pearson SD. Cost, coverage, and comparative effectiveness research: the critical issues for oncology. J. Clin. Oncol. 30(34), 4275-4281 (2012).