Frax prediction without bmd for assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk

Endocrine Practice

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 780-784

  Gadam, Ramesh Keerthi ^a   Schlauch, Karen ^b   Izuora, Kenneth E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DENSITY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT TOOL; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAJOR OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURE; MALE; MEDICAL CARE; OSTEOPOROSIS; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RISK FACTOR; SCREENING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE DENSITY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84886931052     PISSN: 1530891X     EISSN: 19342403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4158/EP12416.OR     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA. 2001;285:785-795.
2. Kanis JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9:1137-1141.
3. Looker AC, Melton LJ 3rd, Harris TB, Borrud LG, Shepherd JA. Prevalence and trends in low femur bone density among older US adults: NHANES 2005-2006 compared with NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:64-71.
4. Pasco JA, Seeman E, Henry MJ, Merriman EN, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA. The population burden of fractures originates in women with osteopenia, not osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:1404-1409.
5. Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med. 1993;94: 646-650.
6. Wasnich R. Bone mass measurement: prediction of risk. Am J Med. 1993;95:6S-10S.
7. Siris E, Delmas PD. Assessment of 10-year absolute fracture risk: A new paradigm with worldwide application. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:383-384.
8. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for osteoporosis: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:356-364.
9. Dawson-Hughes B, Tosteson AN, Melton LJ 3rd et al. Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:449-458.
10. Gourlay ML, Fine JP, Preisser JS, et al. Bone-density testing interval and transition to osteoporosis in older women. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:225-233.
11. Clark EM, Gould VC, Morrison L, Masud T, Tobias J. Determinants of fracture risk in a UK-population-based cohort of older women: A cross-sectional analysis of the Cohort for Skeletal Health in Bristol and Avon (COSHIBA). Age Ageing. 2012;41:46-52.
12. Leslie WD, Majumdar SR, Lix LM, et al. High fracture probability with FRAX usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: Implications for clinical practice. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23:391-397.
13. Izuora KE, Alazraki N, Byrd-Sellers J, Tangpricha V, Nanes MS. Fracture assessment tool risk scores in bone density reports do not change physician prescribing behavior for osteoporosis. Am J Med Sci. 2011;342:5-8.
14. Ettinger B, Liu H, Blackwell T, et al. Validation of FRC, a fracture risk assessment tool, in a cohort of older men: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. J Clin Densitom. 2012;15:334-342.