Representing clinical knowledge in oral medicine using ontologies

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 116, Issue , 2005, Pages 743-748

  Gustafsson, Marie ^a   Falkman, Göran ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SKÖVDE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Dental informatics; Evidence based medicine; Information dissemination; Internet; Knowledge representation; Ontology; Oral medicine; OWL; RDF

Indexed keywords

BIRDS; DENTISTRY; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; SEMANTIC WEB;

CLINICAL DATA; CLINICAL EXPERIENCE; CLINICAL KNOWLEDGE; DENTAL INFORMATICS; DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATIONS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; W3C STANDARDS;

ONTOLOGY;

HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE;

HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE;

EID: 84886916663     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Jontell M, Mattsson U, and Torgersson O. Med View: An instrument for clinical research and education in oral medicine. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2005: 99, 55-63.
2. Hajdukiewicz JR, Vicente KJ, Doyle DJ, Milgram P, and Burns CM. Modeling a medical environment: An ontology for integrated medical informatics design. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2001: 62(1), 79-99.
3. Gruber TR. A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowl. Acquis. 1993: 5(2), 199-220.
4. Manola F and Miller E, eds. RDF Primer: W3C Recommendation 10 February, 2004. 2004. Retrieved December 28, 2004. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/ 2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210/.
5. Smith M, Welty C, and McGuinness D. OWL Web Ontology Language Guide. Created 2004. Retrieved December 28, 2004. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/ 2004/REC-owl-guide-20040210/.
6. Mendonça EA, Cimino JJ, Johnson SB, and Seol YH. Accessing heterogeneous sources of evidence to answer clinical questions. J. Biomed. Inform. 2001: 34(2), 85-98.
7. Cios KJ and Moore GW. Uniqueness of medical data mining. Artif. Intell. Med. 2002: 26(1-2), 1-24.
8. Fernández-López M and Gómez-Pérez A. Overview and analysis of methodologies for building ontologies. Knowl. Engin. Rev. 2002: 17(2), 129-156.
9. Edgington T, Beomjin C, Henson K, Raghu TS, and Vinze A. Adopting ontology to facilitate knowledge sharing. Commun. ACM 2004: 47(11), 85-90.
10. Noy NF and Musen MA. Specifying ontology views by traversal. In: McIlraith SA et al., eds. Proc. ISWC'04. Springer, 2004; pp 713-725.
11. Noy NF, Sintek M, Decker S, Crubezy M, Fergerson RW, and Musen MA. Creating semantic web contents with Protégé-2000. IEEE Intell. Syst. 2001: 2(16), 60-71.
12. Knublauch H, Fergerson RW, Noy NF, and Musen MA. The Proté gé OWL plugin: An open development environment for semantic web applications. In: McIlraith SA et al., eds. Proc. ISWC'04. Springer, 2004; pp 229-243.
13. Zeng Q and Cimino JJ. A knowledge-based, concept-oriented view generation system for clinical data. J. Biomed. Inform. 2001: 34(2), 112-128.
14. Pinto HS and Martins JP. Ontologies: How can they be built? Knowl. Inform. Syst. 2004: 6(4), 441-464.
15. Wetter T. Lessons learnt from bringing knowledge-based systems into routine use. Artif. Intell. Med. 2002: 24(3), 195-203.
16. Mendonça EA. Clinical decision support systems: Perspectives in dentistry. J. Dent. Edu. 2004: 68, 589- 597.
17. Sutherland SE. The building blocks of evidence-based dentistry. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 2000: 66, 241-244.
18. Horrocks I and Patel-Schneider PF. A proposal for an OWL rules language. In: Proc. 13th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM Press, 2004; pp 723-731.
19. Razmerita L, Angehrn AA, and Maedche A. Ontology-based user modeling for knowledge management systems. In: Brusilovsky P, Corbett AT, and de Rosis F, eds. User Modeling. Springer, 2003; pp 213-217.