Specifying ontology views by traversal

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3298, Issue , 2004, Pages 713-725

  Noy, Natalya F ^a   Musen, Mark A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

ONTOLOGY EVOLUTION;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 35048878237     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30475-3_49     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. S. Boag, D. Chamberlin, M. F. Fernndez, D. Florescu, J. Robie, and J. SimŽon. XQuery 1.0: An XML query language. Technical report, W3C, 2003.
2. M. Dean, D. Connolly, F. v. Harmelen, J. Hendler, I. Horrocks, D. L. McGuinness, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and L. A. Stein. Web ontology language (OWL) reference version 1.0, http://www.w3.org/tr/owl-guide/, 2002.
3. C. Fellbaum, editor. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998.
4. R. Fikes and D. L. McGuinness. An axiomatic semantics for RDF, RDF-S, and DAML+OIL. Technical report, World Wide Web Committee (W3C) Note, 2001.
5. T. R. Gruber. A translation approach to portable ontology specification. Knowledge Acquisition, 5:199-220, 1993.
6. A. Halevy. Answering queries using views: a survey. VLDB Journal, 2001.
7. G. Karvounarakis, S. Alexaki, V. Christophides, D. Plexousakis, and M. Scholl. RQL: A declarative query language for RDF. In Eleventh International World Wide Web Conference, page 592-603, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2002.
8. J. Lee and T. W. Malone. Partially shared views: a scheme for communicating among groups that use different type hierarchies. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 8(1):1-26, 1990.
9. D. Lindberg, B. Humphreys, and A. McCray. The Unified Medical Language System. Methods of Information in Medicine, 32(4):281, 1993.
10. A. Magkanaraki, V. Tannen, V. Christophides, and D. Plexousakis. Viewing the semantic web through RVL lenses. In Second International Semantic Web Conference, volume 2870, pages 96-112, Sanibel Island, FL, 2003. Springer-Verlag.
11. N. F. Noy and M. A. Musen. PromptDiff: A fixed-point algorithm for comparing ontology versions. In 18th Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2002), Edmonton.
12. N. F. Noy and M. A. Musen. The PROMPT suite: Interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(6):983-1024, 2003.
13. L. Obrst, H. Liu, and R. Wray. Ontologies for corporate web applications. AI Magazine, 24(3):49-62, 2003.
14. M. Palmer, A. Naeve, and F. Paulsson. The SCAM framework: helping semantic web applications to store and access metadata. In 1st European Semantic Web Symposium (ESWS 2004), Heraklion, Greece, 2004.
15. C. Rosse and J. L. V. Mejino. A reference ontology for bioinformatics: The foundational model of anatomy. Journal of Biomedical Informatics., 2004.
16. R. Volz, D. Oberle, and R. Studer. On views in the semantic web. In 2nd Int. Workshop on Databases, Documents and Information Fusion (DBFUSION02), 2002.
17. R. Volz, D. Oberle, and R. Studer. Implementing views for light-weight web ontologies. In IEEE Database Engineering and Application Symposium (IDEAS), Hong Kong, China, 2003.
18. W3C. Resource description framework (RDF), 2000.