Stages and evaluation of surgical innovation: A clinical example of the ileo neorectal anastomosis after ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis

Surgical Innovation

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 459-465

  Heikens, Joost T ^a,b   Gooszen, Hein G ^a   Rovers, Maroeska M ^a   Van Laarhoven, Cees J H M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Microvida Laboratory for Medical Microbiology and Immunology   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

colorectal surgery; evidence based medicine surgery; surgical education

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; COLON RESECTION; EVALUATION; FAMILIAL COLON POLYPOSIS; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; ILEO NEORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; MORBIDITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SMALL INTESTINE; SURGICAL SCIENCE; ULCERATIVE COLITIS; VASCULAR PEDICLE;

COLORECTAL SURGERY; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE/SURGERY; SURGICAL EDUCATION;

ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS COLI; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; COLITIS, ULCERATIVE; COLORECTAL SURGERY; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; ILEUM; RECTUM;

EID: 84886909258     PISSN: 15533506     EISSN: 15533514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1553350612468959     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barkun JS, Aronson JK, Feldman LS, et al. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet. 2009 ; 374: 1089-1096
2. Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, et al. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet. 2009 ; 374: 1097-1104
3. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet. 2009 ; 374: 1105-1112
4. Blazeby JM, Blencowe NS, Titcomb DR, Metcalfe C, Hollowood AD, Barham CP. Demonstration of the IDEAL recommendations for evaluating and reporting surgical innovation in minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 2011 ; 98: 544-551
5. Laarhoven van CJ, Hueting WE, Schipper ME, et al. Ileo-neorectal anastomosis: medium- and long-term follow-up of 37 patients. Dig Surg. 2004 ; 21: 371-378
6. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J. 1978 ; 2: 85-88
7. Duijvendijk van P, Slors JF, Taat CW, Bemelman WA, van Lochem LT. Proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; results from 100 consecutive patients in the Academic Medical Center at Amsterdam, 1994-1999 [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 ; 144: 612-616
8. Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg. 1995 ; 222: 120-127
9. Fazio VW, Tekkis PP, Remzi F, et al. Quantification of risk for pouch failure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery. Ann Surg. 2003 ; 238: 605-614
10. Laarhoven van CJ, Andriesse GI, Schipper ME, Akkermans LM, van Vroonhoven TJ, Gooszen HG. Ileoneorectal anastomosis: early clinical results of a restorative procedure for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis without formation of an ileoanal pouch. Ann Surg. 1999 ; 230: 750-757
11. Laarhoven van CJ, Andriesse GI, Back WA, et al. The ileo neorectal anastomosis: an experimental study on development of the surgical technique and theoretical background. Colorectal Dis. 2001 ; 3: 82-94
12. Brody GS, McCorriston JR. Experimental transplantation of small bowel mucosa to the rectum. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1961 ; 28: 12-25
13. Peck DA, Hallenbeck GA. Fecal continence in the dog after replacement of rectal mucosa with ileal mucosa. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1964 ; 119: 1312-1320
14. Hueting WE, Buskens E, van de, Tweel I, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Results and complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of 43 observational studies comprising 9,317 patients. Dig Surg. 2005 ; 22: 69-79
15. Lovegrove RE, Heriot AG, Constantinides V, et al. Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes of J, W and S ileal reservoirs for restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis. 2007 ; 9: 310-320
16. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999 ; 44: 77-80
17. Heikens JT, Gooszen HG, Teepen JL, et al. The ileo neo rectal anastomosis: long-term results of surgical innovation in patients after ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Int J Colorectal Dis. :
18. Andriesse GI, Gooszen HG, Schipper ME, Akkermans LM, van Vroonhoven TJ, van Laarhoven CJ. Functional results and visceral perception after ileo neo-rectal anastomosis in patients: a pilot study. Gut. 2001 ; 48: 683-689
19. Barkun JS, Barkun AN, Sampalis JS, et al. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy: The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Lancet. 1992 ; 340: 1116-1119
20. Gabbay J, Walley T. Introducing new health interventions. BMJ. 2006 ; 332: 64-65
21. McDonnell A, Wilson R, Goodacre S. Evaluating and implementing new services. BMJ. 2006 ; 332: 109-112
22. Stevens A, Milne R. Health technology assessment in England and Wales. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 ; 20: 11-24
23. Barker CF, Kaiser LR. Is surgical science dead? The Excelsior Society lecture. J Am Coll Surg. 2004 ; 198: 1-19