Introducing new health interventions

British Medical Journal

Volumn 332, Issue 7533, 2006, Pages 64-65

  Gabbay, John ^a   Walley, Tom ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BETA INTERFERON; TRASTUZUMAB;

BREAST CANCER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DEVICE; DRUG ELUTING STENT; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; POLITICS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKILL; TECHNOLOGY; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 30744446976     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.332.7533.64     Document Type: Editorial

References (11)

1. Banta HB, Luce BR. Health care technology and its assessment: an international perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
2. Stevens A, Milne R. Health technology assessment in England and Wales. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004;20:11-24.
3. Garry R, Fountain J, Brown J, Manca A, Mason S, Sculpher M, et al. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. Health Technol Assess 2004;8(26).
4. Clegg A, Scott D, Loveman E, Colquitt J, Hutchinson J, Royle P, et al. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices for end-stage heart failure: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2005;9(45).
5. Cooper B, Stone S, Kibbler C, Cookson B, Roberts J, Medley G, et al. Systematic review of isolation policies in the hospital management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a review of the literature with epidemiological and economic modelling. Health Technol Assess 2003;7(39).
6. Gabbay J. What approaches have been used in assessing health technologies? The contribution of HTA to decision making. In: Rawlins M, Little-Johns P, eds. Delivering quality in the NHS. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press, 2004:14-7.
7. Dodwell D, Crellin A. Waiting for radiotherapy. BMJ 2006;332:107-9.
8. McDonnell A, Wilson R, Goodacre S. Evaluating and implementing new services. BMJ 2006;332:109-12.
9. Wilson CB. Adoption of surgical technology. BMJ 2006;332:112-4.
10. Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Dinnes J, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PMM, Kleijnen J. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8(4).
11. Australian Government Productivity Commission. Impacts of advances in medical technology in Australia. 31 August 2005. www.pc.gov.au/study/ medicaltechnology/finalreport/medicaltechnology.pdf(accessed 9 Jan 2005).