Influence of surface nano-roughness on osseointegration of zirconia implants in rabbit femur heads using selective infiltration etching technique

Journal of Oral Implantology

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 583-590

  Aboushelib, Moustafa N ^a   Salem, Noha A ^a   Taleb, Ahmed L Abo ^a   Moniem, Naglaa M Abd El ^a  

^a Alexandria University ^*  (Egypt)

Author keywords

Bone implant contact; Nano technology; Osseointegration; Peri implant bone density; Selective infiltration etching; Zirconia implants

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; DENTAL PORCELAIN; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REGENERATION; DENTAL ETCHING; FEMUR; MALE; METHODOLOGY; RABBIT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; FEMUR; MALE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RABBITS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84886880488     PISSN: 01606972     EISSN: 15481336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00075     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstro?m J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52:155-170.
2. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 2-review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:544-564.
3. Badr NA, El Hadary AA. Hydroxyapatite-electroplated cptitanium implant and its bone integration potentiality: An in vivo study. Implant Dent. 2007;16:297-308.
4. Jung RE, Holderegger C, Sailer I, Khraisat A, Suter A, Ha?mmerle CH. The effect of all-ceramic and porcelain-fused-tometal restorations on marginal peri-implant soft tissue color: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008;28:357-365.
5. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1-25.
6. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater. 2004; 20:449-456.
7. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Evaluation of a high fracture toughness composite ceramic for dental applications. J Prosthodont. 2008;17:538-544.
8. Christel P, Meunier A, Heller M, Torre JP, Peille CN. Mechanical properties and short-term in-vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially- stabilized zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res. 1989;23:45-61.
9. Akagawa Y, Ichikawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Interface histology of unloaded and early loaded partially stabilized zirconia endosseous implant in initial bone healing. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:599-604.
10. Gahlert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H, Erhardt W. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:662-668.
11. Ichikawa Y, Akagawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Tissue compatibility and stability of a new zirconia ceramic in vivo. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:322-326.
12. Hulbert SF, Morrison SJ, Klawitter JJ. Tissue reaction to three ceramics of porous and non-porous structures. J Biomed Mater Res. 1972;6:347-374.
13. Covacci V, Bruzzese N, Maccauro G, et al. In vitro evaluation of the mutagenic and carcinogenic power of high purity zirconia ceramic. Biomaterials. 1999;20:371-376.
14. Akagawa Y, Hosokawa R, Sato Y, Kamayama K. Comparison between freestanding and tooth-connected partially stabilized zirconia implants after two years? function in monkeys: A clinical and histologic study. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:551-558.
15. Hoffmann O, Angelov N, Gallez F, Jung RE, Weber FE. The zirconia implant-bone interface: A preliminary histologic evaluation in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:691-695.
16. Kohal RJ, Wolkewitz M, Hinze M, Han JS, Bachle M, Butz F. Biomechanical and histological behavior of zirconia implants: An experiment in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:333-339.
17. Langhoff JD, Voelter K, Scharnweber D, et al. Comparison of chemically and pharmaceutically modified titanium and zirconia implant surfaces in dentistry: A study in sheep. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:1125-1132.
18. Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Addis A, Schupbach P, Simion M. Surface-modified zirconia implants: tissue response in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;20:844-850.
19. Att W, Takeuchi M, Suzuki T, Kubo K, Anpo M, Ogawa T. Enhanced osteoblast function on ultraviolet light-treated zirconia. Biomaterials. 2009;30:1273-1280.
20. Aboushelib M, Feilzer A. New surface treatment for zirconia based materials. European patent application no. 05077396.9. 2006.
21. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Selective infiltration-etching technique for a strong and durable bond of resin cements to zirconia-based materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98: 379-388.
22. Aboushelib MN, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ. Bonding to zirconia using a new surface treatment. J Prosthodont. 2010;19:340-346.
23. Aboushelib MN, Matinlinna JP, Salameh Z, Ounsi H. Innovations in bonding to zirconia-based materials: part I. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1268-1272.
24. Ertan AA, Celebi N, Bayolken M, et al. Surface topography of zirconia implants does not alter action potentials of isolated rat sciatic nerves. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;88:182-190.
25. Kohal RJ, Weng D, Bachle M, Strub JR. Loaded custommade zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: An animal experiment. J Periodontol. 2004;75:1262-1268.
26. Robert WE, Turly PK, Brezniak N, Fielder PJ. Implant: bone physiology and metabolism. CDA J. 1987;15:54-61.
27. Matos MA, Araú jo FP, Paixa?o FB. Histomorphometric evaluation of bone healing in rabbit fibular osteotomy model without fixation. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3:1749-1799.
28. Hsu SH, Liu BS, Lin WH, Chiang HC, Huang SC, Cheng SS. Characterization and biocompatibility of a titanium dental implant with a laser irradiated and dual-acid etched surface. Biomed Mater Eng. 2007;17:53-68.
29. Bitschnau A, Alt V, Bohner F, et al. Comparison of new bone formation, implant integration, and biocompatibility between RGD-hydroxyapatite and pure hydroxyapatite coating for cementless joint prostheses an experimental study in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;88:66-74.
30. Aboushelib MN, Wang H. Effect of surface treatment on flexural strength of zirconia bars. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;104:98-104.
31. Aboushelib MN, Salameh Z. Zirconia implant abutment fracture: clinical case reports and precautions for use. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22:616-619.
32. Depprich R, Zipprich H, Ommerborn M, et al. Osseointegration of zirconia implants: An SEM observation of the boneimplant interface. Head Face Med. 2008;4:25.
33. Liu SY, Chen IW. Fatigue of yttria-stabilized zirconia: I, fatigue damage, fracture origins, and lifetime prediction. J Am Ceram Soc. 1991;74:1197-1205.
34. Denry IL, Holloway JA. Microstructural and crystallographic surface changes after grinding zirconia-based dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;76:440-448.
35. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:889-902.
36. Blaschke C, Volz U. Soft and hard tissue response to zirconium dioxide dental implants-a clinical study in man. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2006;27(suppl 1):69-72.
37. Depprich R, Zipprich H, Ommerborn M, et al. Osseointegration of zirconia implants compared with titanium: An in vivo study. Head Face Med. 2008;4:30.
38. Sennerby L, Dasmah A, Larsson B, Iverhed M. Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: A histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7(suppl 1):S13-S20.
39. Lee J, Sieweke JH, Rodriguez NA, et al. Evaluation of nanotechnology modified zirconia oral implants: A study in rabbits. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:610-617.