Effects of electrical pulse polarity shape on intra cochlear neural responses in humans: Triphasic pulses with cathodic second phase

Hearing Research

Volumn 306, Issue , 2013, Pages 123-130

  Bahmer, Andreas ^a   Baumann, Uwe ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA POTENTIAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; NERVE POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACTION POTENTIALS; AGED; ARTIFACTS; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE NET; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84886827756     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bahmer A., Baumann U. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for ECAP recording: I. Amplitude growth functions. J.Neurosci. Methods 2012, 205:202-211.
2. Bahmer A., Baumann U. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for ECAP recording: II. Recovery functions and polarity. J.Neurosc Methods 2012, 205:212-220.
3. Bahmer A., Peter O., Baumann U. Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (E-ABR) with an integrated stimulus generator in Matlab. J.Neurosci. Methods 2008, 173:306-314.
4. Bahmer A., Peter O., Baumann U. Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab. J.Neurosci. Methods 2010, 191:66-74.
5. Bahmer A., Polak M., Baumann U. Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses after electrical stimulation with biphasic, triphasic and precision triphasic pulses. Hear. Res. 2010, 259:75-85.
6. Bonnet R.M., Frijns J.H., Peeters S., Briaire J.J. Speech recognition with a cochlear implant using triphasic charge-balanced pulses. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004, 124:371-375.
7. Briaire J.J., Frijns J.H.M. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential. Hear. Res. 2005, 205:143-156.
8. Brown M.C. The antidromic compound action potential of the auditory nerve. J.Neurophysiol. 1994, 71:1826-1834.
9. Brummer S.B., Turner M.J. Electrochemical considerations for safe electrical stimulation of the nervous system with platinum electrodes. IEEE Trans. Bio-Med. Eng. 1977, 24:59-63.
10. Cartee L., Wilson B., Cox J., Wolford R., Lawson D. Intracochlear Potentials Evoked by Electrical Stimulation with Phase-separated Balanced Biphasic Pulses. Ninth Quarterly Progress Report 2004, NIH Contract N01-DC-2-1002.
11. Coste R.L., Pfingst B.E. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. III. Pulse polarity. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 1996, 99:3099-3108.
12. Eddington D.K., Tierney J., Noel V., Hermann B., Whearty M., Finley C.C. Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses. Ninth Quarterly Progress Report 2004, NIH contract N01-DC-2-1001.
13. Hartmann R., Topp G., Klinke R. Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear. Res. 1984, 13:47-62.
14. Javel E., Shepherd R.K. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure. Hear. Res. 2000, 140:45-76.
15. Macherey O., Carlyon R.P., van Wieringen A., Deeks J.M., Wouters J. Higher sensitivity of human auditory nerve fibers to positive electrical currents. J.Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2008, 9:241-251.
16. Macherey O., van Wieringen A., Carlyon R.P., Deeks J.M., Wouters J. Asymmetric pulses in cochlear implants: effects of pulse shape, polarity, and rate. J.Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2006, 7:253-266.
17. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., Hay-Mccutcheon M.J., Robinson B.K., Nourski K.V., Jeng F.C. Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials. Hear. Res. 2004, 198:75-86.
18. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., Robinson B.K., Rubinstein J.T., Matsuoka A.J. Electrically evoked single-fiber action potentials from cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hear. Res. 1999, 130:197-218.
19. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., Rubinstein J.T., Robinson B.K., Matsuoka A.J., Woodworth G. Electrically evoked compound action potentials of guinea pig and cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hear. Res. 1998, 119:142-154.
20. Rattay F. The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system. Neuroscience 1999, 89:335-346.
21. Rattay F., Leao R.N., Felix H. Amodel of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. II. Influence of the three-dimensional cochlear structure on neural excitability. Hear. Res. 2001, 153:64-79.
22. Rattay F., Lutter P., Felix H. Amodel of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes. Hear. Res. 2001, 153:43-63.
23. Rubinstein J.T., Miller C.A., Mino H., Abbas P.J. Analysis of monophasic and biphasic electrical stimulation of nerve. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2001, 48:1065-1070.
24. Shepherd R.K., Javel R.K. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties. Hear. Res. 1999, 130:171-188.
25. Shepherd R.K., Linahan N., Xu J., Clark G.M., Araki S. Chronic Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve using non-charge balanced stimuli. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999, 119:674-684.
26. Spitzer P. ART-GUIDE: Introduction to the MED-EL ART-system AW 5412 Rev. 2.0 2007, MED-EL Worldwide Headquaters, Innsbruck, Austria.
27. Spitzer P. EAP Recording System (EAPRS) - Manual 2010, MED-EL Worldwide Headquaters, Innsbruck, Austria.
28. Undurraga J.A. Basic Neural Mechanisms of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve 2013, (Ph.D. thesis), KU Leuven, Faculty of Medicine.
29. Undurraga J.A., Carlyon R.P., Wouters J., van Wieringen A. The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem. J.Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2013, 14:359-377.
30. Undurraga J.A., van Wieringen A., Carlyon R.P., Macherey O., Wouters J. Polarity effects on neural responses of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve at different cochlear sites. Hear. Res. 2010, 269:146-161.
31. Waltzman S.B., Roland J.T. Cochlear Implants 2006, Thieme Medical Publishers.
32. Wieringen A., Macherey O., Carlyon R.P., Deeks J.M., Wouters J. Alternative pulse shapes in electrical hearing. Hear. Res. 2008, 242:154-163.
33. Zeng F.-G. Trends in cochlear implants. J.Trends Amplif. 2004, 8:1-34.
34. Zierhofer C. Adaptive sigma-delta modulation with one-bit quantization. IEEE Trans. Circuit Syst. 2000, 47:408-415.